Loading a mag to capacity.

Status
Not open for further replies.

WrongHanded

Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2017
Messages
4,771
It's getting cold enough now that I can put the summer carry revolver away in favor of my Sig P220. 8+1. Or is it 7+1?

That last round doesn't much like going into any of the mags I have, and a full mag certainly doesn't lock into the gun as easily when the slide is forward as it does with just 7 in there. Concerns about the mag not seating properly, (particularly if a tactical reload were necessary) makes me wonder if squeezing that 8th round in there is a good idea or not. Then there's the question of whether the spring will take a set, and if it does, whether that will make things better or worse.

Do you down-load a handgun magazine by 1, or keep them full loaded? I've noticed some mags, like those for my P220, really don't like being full. Whilst others, like my wife's P239 .40, take all 7 of 7 just fine. I remember reading some words of Ayoob, suggesting down-loading a handgun magazine by 1 for reliable operation. What do you think?
 
On a defense weapon, I load the magazine full, rack the slide, and holster.
So, is that a download? I only top off for IDPA where it is required.

When Chuck Taylor was amassing hundreds of thousands of rounds through an early Glock, he found that the magazines lasted much longer when loaded with 15 instead of 17.
 
On a defense weapon, I load the magazine full, rack the slide, and holster.
So, is that a download? I only top off for IDPA where it is required.

When Chuck Taylor was amassing hundreds of thousands of rounds through an early Glock, he found that the magazines lasted much longer when loaded with 15 instead of 17.

I wouldn't consider that down-loading. I assume you keep spare mags fully loaded?
 
I'm with those that won't top off but will load the magazine to capacity and then chamber a round. I also carry a spare mag so that if there is a mag induced malfunction, I can replace the offending mag and stay in the fight.
 
Many guys function test with carry ammo, but dont test with the plus 1 loading. It may not make a difference, but I think its best to test the way it will be carried.
 
I generally load to capacity and top off after I chamber a round. I don't buy "extended" magazines though. It is my belief that extended magazines are probably pushing the spring to it's limit, but that "standard" magazines likely are not. For example on my Beretta I opt for the 15rd magazines rather than the 17s, or the Sig I used to have (P226) I would use the 16rd magazines over the 18rd mecgars that were the same size. I imagine when I get a 1911 I'll stay with the 7 round magazines over the 8 round magazines as well.

That isn't necessarily a scientific appraisal but I the reason I believe it is because a magazine that fits flush must be lighter on the spring than a higher capacity magazine that also sits flush, unless there is some kind of special spring that handles extreme compression better I don't think it can be good for the spring to overload those flush fits. Extended magazines with gigantic followers that add several inches to the pistol grip are probably fine, but I like flush fit.
 
For example on my Beretta I opt for the 15rd magazines rather than the 17s, or the Sig I used to have (P226) I would use the 16rd magazines over the 18rd mecgars that were the same size. I imagine when I get a 1911 I'll stay with the 7 round magazines over the 8 round magazines as well.

The 1911 might be a good comparison to the P220 as far as mags and capacity go. It's my understanding that the P220 once came with flush fitting 7 round magazines. But at some point, probably to making loading a fresh mag into the gun easier, the 8 round with bumper plate became standard. Now I don't know if the 1911 8 round mags are a tight squeeze (no experience with 1911s), but the P220 mags certainly are. It almost seems like Sig tried a little too hard to get that extra capacity, because the other Sigs I've had don't have the same issue.

In the P229 and P239 mags, when fully loaded, there's a little extra room to push that top round down below the feed lips. The P220 8 round mags have no extra room at all. I recall having the same sort experience with some models of Glock (though I can't recall which), but to a slightly lesser extent.

Having said that, I topped off the spare mags I have. But didn't top off the one in the gun after chambering. Perhaps they'll loosen up a little. Two are newer and haven't been fully loaded for any real length of time. I've always been reluctant to load them fully because they're so freaking tight.
 
I load the carry mag to full capacity, then chamber a round. Additional mags on double stack autos are down loaded by 1- not for reliable operation, but for ease of insertion for a tactical reload (replacing a reduced capacity mag after firing with a full(er) magazine). I have never seen a quality single stack 1911 have any issues doing this with QUALITY magazines that have been loaded to capacity though- only with the various double stacks. No experience with the 220- I would run factory mags in good condition, and train with them loaded to full capacity before I made any decision. YMMV.
 
It's my understanding that the P220 once came with flush fitting 7 round magazines. But at some point, probably to making loading a fresh mag into the gun easier, the 8 round with bumper plate became standard.
The original SIG 220, in .45ACP, was designed to be used with a 7-rd magazine. These are the German made flush fitting models with either the dovetail or zipper back seam. At some point someone decided that changing the follower would allow the original mags to hold 8-rds...these were very hard to load and never known for their reliable feeding.

The 8-rd magazines, made in Italy, with the bumper pads were designed to hide a longer magazine tube. The longer tube 8-rd magazine are reliable and much easier to load to full capacity. The longer tube also allows the cartridge column to be depressed when inserted into the 220 when the slide is closed

Now I don't know if the 1911 8 round mags are a tight squeeze (no experience with 1911s), but the P220 mags certainly are.
Some are and some aren't. The original Wilson 47D magazines suffered from the same issue the the German 220 magazines did...too short magazine tubes...which cause some failures. The Wilson ETM magazines corrected this with longer magazine bodies
 
Last edited:
I load, chamber, and top off.

But, I do have a magazine for my Ruger P95 that, for whatever reason, I cannot get more than 12 rounds in. It's supposed to hold fifteen.
 
The 8-rd magazines, made in Italy, with the bumper pads were designed to hide a longer magazine tube. The longer tube 8-rd magazine are reliable and much easier to load to full capacity. The longer tube also allows the cartridge column to be depressed when inserted into the 220 when the slide is closed

Thanks for the P220 history lesson!

Based on what you said, I decided to test my mags, which are the made in Italy ones. I grabbed a pen and pushed down on the last round in the mag. It took a surprising amount of force to get that follower bottomed out. But I was even more surprised at how much extra space there was in that magazine! So I then took it to the bathroom scales and repeated the same process to get an idea of how much force it took. The scale read about 25lbs.

I then tried this on another loaded mag, but it must have been one of the newer one. I got about 35lbs down on that one, and the top round didn't move nearly as far. Perhaps the spring just needs to set.

Interesting stuff though. These are definitely the stiffest magazines I've ever used.
 
I carry magazines fully loaded + 1 in chamber.
Related to detail supplied with question:
Its been heat index of 100+ degrees and I've been carrying Glock 21/22 size pistol IWB along with Kahr PM40 in pocket.
If I worked outdoors (road crew) then I'd have to make do with just the pocket gun.
 
IME, I've had good mag springs, which were tight when new, loosen up to take the
full load, after being left loaded for a few days. I guess you might call it a "spring
break in". OTOH, some springs are total crap straight out of the box. Then you
need to order new springs from Wolff. SIG is a pretty good brand, I'd give them the
benefit of the doubt. Load up those mags for a couple days, and see if they loosen
up a little.
 
Have to be careful what you get, too.
I bought two Checkmate 8x45 magazines CM45-8-S-H-RB (don't know if that is the Checkmate ID or a Top Gun Supply catalog number.) that resemble Power Mags but with the hybrid lips.
They HOLD 8 but with no slack in the stack, and cannot be loaded under a closed slide. They feed well when loaded under an open slide to get 7+1 or just loaded with 7.

Looks like I should have ordered CM45-8-S-H-EXT with that little bit longer tube concealed by the base pad.
 
... Do you down-load a handgun magazine by 1, or keep them full loaded? ...
Fully loaded. And, like other responders, after chambering a round I top-off the mag in the pistol.

Many types of pistol mags are TIGHT on the last round or two when new/little-used ... but they loosen-up after you "fun-unload" them several times. :)
 
As others have stated, I load my magazine to full capacity, chamber a round then top off with a fresh fully loaded mag and load an additional round into the mag that is now down loaded by one round. Having said that, there are some in the community that are big advocates of down loading mags by one round, Ken Hackathorn and Larry Vickers in particular advocate down loading mags by one round. To date, I've had no issues with full mag plus one chambered in any of my carry guns over the years. Over the years I've carried a Springfield TRP, a Wilson Combat CQB Compact, a Sig P226, a Sig P229, a Walther P99, and now an HK P30SK V1, or during the summer months for a slimmer footprint, a Walther PPS M1. Having said that, I have noticed that the P229 takes more effort to seat a fully loaded 15 round magazine with the slide in battery and the same applies to the Springfield TRP with CERTAIN 8 round magazines. Wilson 47D and Tactical Elite mags seat fairly easily as do standard 7 round magazines.
 
..... SIG is a pretty good brand, I'd give them the
benefit of the doubt. Load up those mags for a couple days, and see if they loosen
up a little.

Sig being a good brand is part of what I've been struggling with regarding these mags (all factory). The gun was bought new and I've had it for about 4 years. It's been in and out of carry rotation, but hasn't been shot all that much (maybe 500-600 rounds at a guestimate) because up until this year I just didn't shoot nearly as much as I should have. So it's possible that not all of the four mags have made it to the range for "fun unloading". But all have sat fully loaded for at least a week at a time, here and there.

It sounds like I may need to thoroughly ensure all mags have been "fun unloaded" multiple times this weekend. You know, just to make absolutely sure. What a chore that'll be. ;)
 
For most days, I don't worry too much about fully topping off to have every possible round I can get - most days... I'll admit - I almost never load 17 in G17 or G19+2 mags, simply because my reloaded cartridge boxes hold rows of 5 or 10... There's a great number of days where I carry a G19 with only 10 loaded, instead of 15 or 17 (w/ +2). If you want to add capacity, get extended mags or base plates. I run G17 mags in my G19 quite regularly, or G19's with a +2 or +5 base plate. I run a 15rnd grip extended mag most of the time in my P224 (or at least have the extended mag as the backup).

I also spent a few years where I didn't ever load to full "+1" capacity because I was pulling my pistol and unloading when I went in a lot of places - so I'd put the chambered round back into the magazine, rather than having a completely full mag and one loose round. Doing so makes life easier when a guy throws the loaded mag into a glove box or console, so you don't have to worry about the loose round digging its way to the bottom. I did this whether using a 17+1 full size or a 6+1 pocket pistol. Logistically, it made my day more efficient to just have a full mag and skip the +1.

A guy doesn't need to make life so complicated to be fretting over tactical reloads vs. empty pistol reloads either - if your pistol has issue with full mag reloads, either change the pistol, or don't load full mags. For models which physically allow it, tactical reload should be sufficiently forceful to seat the magazine, even when fully loaded, under the closed slide, and if your particular model doesn't physically allow for this, then the back-up magazines should be loaded accordingly to allow for a tactical reload. Being short ONE ROUND at the end of a mag is a lot lesser penalty than having the pistol malfunction because the mag didn't fully seat. Pretty simple logic.

Equally, if I can't avoid going somewhere which I think might be a higher risk than others, I might be more prone to load more heavily. There's a motorcycle shop in town I visit once or twice a year in a "less than great" part of town. While I might usually only carry a Ruger LCP with 6 rounds and no spare mag as my EDD (Every Damned Day - accentuated for emphasis against what I'd consider my EDC pistol), I'll take a G19 with a 20rnd mag (G19+5) and a back up mag, or a P224 with a 15rnd and backup 15rnd. When I'm with my wife and son, I'm more prone to carry a larger caliber, higher capacity pistol, as I might find myself stuck defending more than just myself - 3 ppl are a larger target, and retreat with a youngster is slower than alone.

Theory and speculation can't out run common sense. If running full mags might cause a life threatening failure in the moment of truth because a full mag wouldn't lock into the pistol, then don't run a full mag. If you cause yourself headaches digging for a loose round in your glovebox, or get sticky soda residue on your loose round because you leave it in your cupholder, then it makes sense to simplify your life and ditch the "+1." The likelihood of a gang attack in the country, a mile off of the road is pretty low, so I'm content with my LCP, whereas my odds of having issues which require more than 6rnds of 380acp are higher when I'm in the wrong part of major metro markets on business trips.

Use your noggin... The answers are all there.
 
If you have to lock the bolt or slide open to get a full magazine to seat,
if you have to "slingshot" the slide or bolt (pull back and release) to get the first round fed rather than just press the bolt/slide release,
maybe it is time to consider backing off a round or two when loading the magazine.

In the 1990s it was common practice in federal law enforcement when using the Colt AR 9mm carbine and .223 rifles to load the magazines to 90% of full capacity for easy mag insertion and seating on a close bolt and positive feed of first rounds. Typically 27 rounds in a 30 rd mag.

Oh, and somehow loading 31 rounds in a 30 round magazine can be the source of high hilarity ... when you talk about it a month after. In a life or death situation, not so funny to have a gun that doesn't want to feed at all.
 
So it's possible that not all of the four mags have made it to the range for "fun unloading". But all have sat fully loaded for at least a week at a time, here and there.
Just curious.

Did you disassemble and clean them when they were new?
Did you reassemble them with the spring oriented correctly? The top and bottom of the spring are different
 
Just curious.

Did you disassemble and clean them when they were new?
Did you reassemble them with the spring oriented correctly? The top and bottom of the spring are different

That's a good thought. Thank you for mentioning it.

Yes, I have disassembled and clean each one at least once. I'm always very careful about spring orientation when reassembling magazines. But(!)... I've been wrong before. So I'll double check all the springs tonight.
 
Beretta half-heartedly recommends against topping off in at least some of their pistol manuals. I say "half-heartedly" because after the recommendation they give a procedure for topping off.

I thought it was interesting that the rationale for not topping off was that a magazine that is one round down and in the gun has about the same tension on the magazine spring as a fully loaded magazine that is not in the gun. Apparently when the mag is in the gun, the downward pressure applied by the stripper rail is roughly equivalent to tension applied by loading another round in the mag.

I've run into at least one pistol where the magazines could not be locked into the gun with the slide forward and the magazines fully loaded. That's a gun that obviously shouldn't be topped off...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top