9mm 1911 FTF

Status
Not open for further replies.

mljdeckard

Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2006
Messages
13,319
Location
In a part of Utah that resembles Tattooine.
I have a new RIA double-stack 9mm 1911, and it is very finicky. It will reliably feed 124 gr hydra-shoks, I'm guessing because of the nickle-plated cases, but everything else is a crap shoot. It doesn't like 115 gr, and it doesn't like my handloads. I was getting FTEs, and I sent it back to the factory. (They tuned the extractor.) Now, it sticks a lot on chambering. The cartridges will stop the slide from going into battery. The hit a hard stop about 1/4" out. I have to drop the magazine and argue with it. (These are the same handloads my wife's XD will eat ad infinitum.)

I have used different magazines, (it came with one that is altered a bit to run .22 TCMs,) and lightened the spring in one of them. It helps, but not a lot. If I only load 5 rounds in any magazine, it will feed all five no problem.

Am I to the point I need to have the chamber polished and throated? (Or any other process that will loosen it up a bit?) It is a ramped barrel.
 
When I've had feedling problems and yours sounds similar to a 3 point jam on feeding I narrowed my problem down to not enough crimp. It seemed as long as there was still a feelable lip on the case mouth it would hangup on the roof of the chamber. Think of needing a medium to medium+ crimp over a light crimp.
 
Just because a round will chamber in one gun is no guarantee that it will in another...especially handloads. Only way that it should always work is if every part of the cartridge meets SAAMI specs especially for the bullet profile & diameter as well as crimp and COAL.

You need to do a plunk test with the barrel and the round to make sure that it will chamber correctly. Plenty of info on the web on how to do that.
 
One suggestion try some different magazines--9mm Magazines in the 1911 platform have been noted for causing some issues by others. Wilson Combat, in particular, is noted for making good magazines in 9mm and .45 ACP.
 
It's not just my handloads. (And my handloads plunk test just fine.) It's pretty muvh anything but 124 gr premium nickle-plated case loads.

The problem with trying different mags with this one is, there aren't a lot of options. It comes with a modified P-18 magazine. It is better than others, but still not perfect.
 
I wouldn't polish the chamber, but I would polish the ramp. It has to be smooth (which some people mistake for shiny).

Now, you also mentioned it was a double stacked magazine. Have you tried it with other magazines yet? Sometimes the feed lips just aren't right and local police officer had a single stack 1911 which he equipped with Wilson magazines. It didn't like the Wilson but it liked USGI and Colt magazines.
 
The magazine they supply has a angled cut in front of the feed lips, because it is also supposed to feed .22 TCM. I read some reviews onnMidway for other P-18 magazines, and most of them said they work fine for all of the above. Some people cut a coil off the spring. I bought two, left one spring stock, and cut the other one. It didn't seem to matter much.

I use wilson 47Ds in my .45 1911.
 
If limited to p18 type mags then you may have to adjust the lips as said by 4v50 Gary to fit the specific bullet profiles you intend to use. Multi caliber mags can sometimes be a bit troublesome. Old time gunsmiths used to have to tweak gi mags for the 1911 to work with other bullet profiles besides ball ammo.
 
You say they 'tuned the extractor'? How is the tension on it now? If too tight it'll for sure hinder feeding and has to be just right for proper functioning.

Failure to eject properly with handloads often means they aren't hot enough....especially if factory ammo will eject OK. If this was the case...then you're needing to either tune the gun to the ammo or the ammo to the gun. It's hard to make a gun that will eat anything because if it'll work with the really light loadings it'll tend to get battered with the heavy stuff. Other way around....if it can handle the really heavy loads it'll very likely not eject the light ones.
 
They are all ejecting. They aren't feeding.

I did a little homework, and figured the extractor was too tight, I sent it backnto RIA and they said it was the opposite. Could a bad extractor cause ftf like this?

What I don't plan on doing is sending it back to them again. I would rather out of pocket to fix it than wait for two-way shipping AGAIN to give it to the guys who didn't fix it the first time.

I am new to the extractor question, all my previous guns worked fine. I am doing soldier weekend stuff right now, I will look at it again when I get home.
 
I know they aren't feeding...NOW. But before you said you sent it back because it wouldn't eject....right? I'm thinking they fixed one problem but created another by making the extractor too tight. The bottom edge contour is pretty important to feeding also...especially if it's tight. A gentle bevel and rounded edge which lets the rim get up the breech face and under the extractor with as little friction as possible can make feeding easier. The ammo that is feeding OK now might have a slightly smaller rim thickness or diameter which is why it'll feed but the others get stuck.

OAL plays an important part in feeding too being as the nose must contact the ramp and start up it but not get too vertical before the feed lips release the rear or the 'three point jam' happens. The Hydra-Shocks might be the correct length to feed properly so maybe if you compare the ammo that is problematic and especially compare the nose shape and where it contacts the feed ramp you'll see that it's too long or short. Late release of the feed lips could be an issue too being as they were trying to make the little bottle-neck TCM work in it too. Maybe try opening the lips a little on one mag just to see if it helps?
 
I know they aren't feeding...NOW. But before you said you sent it back because it wouldn't eject....right? I'm thinking they fixed one problem but created another by making the extractor too tight. The bottom edge contour is pretty important to feeding also...especially if it's tight. A gentle bevel and rounded edge which lets the rim get up the breech face and under the extractor with as little friction as possible can make feeding easier. The ammo that is feeding OK now might have a slightly smaller rim thickness or diameter which is why it'll feed but the others get stuck.

OAL plays an important part in feeding too being as the nose must contact the ramp and start up it but not get too vertical before the feed lips release the rear or the 'three point jam' happens. The Hydra-Shocks might be the correct length to feed properly so maybe if you compare the ammo that is problematic and especially compare the nose shape and where it contacts the feed ramp you'll see that it's too long or short. Late release of the feed lips could be an issue too being as they were trying to make the little bottle-neck TCM work in it too. Maybe try opening the lips a little on one mag just to see if it helps?
Nicely said Recoil Rob.
 
Ok, I am thinking not only is Bob right, the extractor might be the only problem here.

Like I said, I had never had extractor problems before, so I was kind of learning from the beginning. It's hard to learn from online research, how tight is 'too tight'? So I sent it to RIA, thinking it was tighter than it should be, based on my reading. (A bit of effort was required to wedge an empty case under it.) I am thinking that their guy has a very different understanding of what correct extractor tension is, because it's WAY tighter than it was. Difficult to wedge a case under it.

So, first, I am going to find a local guy to look at and maybe replace the extractor. I honestly don't remember if I tried to test it when it came back from RIA, or if I trusted them so completely I just didn't worry about it.

My OAL on my reloads is 1.14, lemme grab a caliper and measure a hydrashok. (brief pause) They are 1.099. I would think that the difference is just because they are a JHP bullet, yes?
 
if it binds after having the extractor tuned, it probably was too tight. If its a 1 piece extractor, they act as a brake on the slide, and too much tension means the cases bind on the breach fighting it.
 
Factory ammo is better, but still frequent jams.

I found a local guy to look at it. I could mess with it myself, but I would probably spend more in ammo with trial and error than I would to just pay someone. I want the dovetail cuts re-milled too.
Hope they fix it up right. Let us know what the problem was as that is useful information for the future.
 
Got it back today, he said they flexed the extractor WAY too tight, he test-fired it with some Aguilla 115 gr, I will try some in the near future. (The real test will be my handloads. He also advised me to make those a little hotter, I'm a powder miser.) Also, he was able to install some Novak-cut sights with no mods.
 
How do your handloads fit in the magazine? I've had problems with short OAL's letting them work forward in the mag which causes feeding issues that aren't present when they stay back against the mag like when they're loaded. Consequently I've gone exclusively to a Lyman 147 which loads at max SAAMI length and just barely fit in the mags...but they shoot great and are 100% function with 3.8 WW231 under them for about 950'ish fps which is pretty much fully power. Lighter bullets have to be driven a lot faster to generate enough recoil momentum to operate the action...just seems the heavies work better an an easier pace.
 
Sounds like the extractor is the issue—as you have discovered. Tuning the extractor hook can go a long way toward smooth feeding and cycling. I would suggest getting a Wilson Combat bulletproof 9mm extractor and studying the shape of the bevels on the hook. You could probably tweak your stock extractor after a little careful study. It’s not that hard.
I have a RIA .22TCM mid size double stack. It fed pretty well out of the box, but I smoothed and tweaked the extractor hook and now it’s flawless. The factory part is MIM as far as I can tell and had some mold lines in the hook that needed to be smoothed out.

A word on extractor tension: cases should slide up onto the breech face fairly easily, but the extractor should hold an empty case in place securely enough that it won’t fall out easily.
Proper hook geometry allows better feeding. Proper extractor tension affects feeding a little bit, but more importantly insures good ejection.

The RIA double stack mags work better if you disassemble them, clean them out and then spray a little Hornady one shot case lube inside. Reassemble, work the spring with loading and unloading and then let it dry thoroughly.

Finally, Fred Craig (TCM inventor) says to case lube your TCM rounds for better feeding and extraction. (Works for factory ammo and reloads). I think the case lube residue helps mag function, too.

I find 9mm rounds feed equally well in the RIA mag and the MecGar mag. The MecGar mag has a much stronger spring so store it fully loaded for a while till the spring takes a set. It will feed smoothly once that is done.

Note: I shoot Federal HST 124gr hollow points and RMR 124gr plated reloads in 9mm mode.
 
I may just buy a better extractor and drop it in and see what happens. Smarter guys than me have already doodled with this one.

I haven't tried the TCM since I got it back. Every time I go shoot, I grab my box of them, see the price tag, and change my mind. I am about to go occupy the sandbox for a year, I may bulk up on reloading components while I'm gone so I can shoot it without crying about money.

I may strip the mags, smooth out the followers, and lube them a bit. I usually use dry graphite lube on magazines.

I will try TCMs without lube first to see what happens. I may try light lube on them if there's still a problem. That might help the 9mms too, but I don't see myself lubing the cases, carrying them day in and day out, and expecting the lube to stay in place.

I bought two mec-gar mags, and based on reviewer recommendations, I cut a coil off of one of the springs. There is no difference at all between either of them, or the divoted mag that came with it.

I intend to carry 124 gr HSTs, but at the time I could only find Hydra-Shoks, so I tested them and that's what I have right now. (They run flawlessly, btw. I mostly credit the nickle-plated cases for that.) I have been loading 124 gr Berry's p!ated lead, I plan to bulk up on fmj and see what happens. I have been loading 4.0 grains of titegroup, which is about the max for non-jacketed bullets.
 
So I cleaned it and doodled with it a bit. The infuriating thing is, it plunk tests just fine. Fifty handloads, no problem.

I tried to pull the extractor out just for fun, and it wouldn't come out. At least if budged a couple of mm, before I couldn't even make it do that. Cases will wedge under it snugly, but not with difficulty.

Should I get another extractor? At this point, I would call it a good investment if it works,.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top