A few more comments didn't have to time to post yesterday.
Sometimes even the classic proper brass punch is no match for a modern day sight installation performed by a hydraulic arbor press at the factory.
A friend asked me to put some AmeriGlo sights on this M&P Shield that also are notorious for having tight-fitted factory sights and the Sheild slide is relatively thin
in the rear so using a poor-quality sight pusher that creates flex stressing can and will crack the slide.
At the time MGW did not offer a dedicated footplate (footplates fit in the rail recesses to brace and secure the slide in a downward direction), so I started off using a shaped brass punch.
I also setup the slide height so that the top edge of the vise jaw surface will allow the punch to lay flush and impact the sight base as horizontally as possible and not
angled downward which can lead to punch slippage and marring. Always put some tape on the punch tips, its that much less brass / aluminum to remove from the
finished surface of the sights. When using the sight pusher also apply tape to the engagement surfaces to prevent sight marring.
Even with all the usual elements of correct setup, the tip of the punch was just being deformed with impact. So I switched to a steel starter punch for the front sight with a diameter
as close to the sight base that would fit. It finally moved and came off. The round punch face impacting the usually rectangular sight base target wastes impact energy
as only a portion of the punch face is making contact with the sight; whenever possible, shape the punch to match.
The M&P sights have ribs on the forward and rear surfaces, purportedly to assist the hydraulic arbor press in guiding the sight parallel into the dove tails and not snow-plowing
the leading edges into the walls of the dovetails. It is these extra ribs that make some modern sights much more difficult to remove.
I have the Shield foot plate now.