NIGHTLORD40K
Member
I was thinking CIA station chief in Baghdad....... Lol.Public Librarian in a small town that has a bridge to Tamaulipas, Mexico.
-Among other things, this is where the parole officers and parolees meet every Tuesday... .
I was thinking CIA station chief in Baghdad....... Lol.Public Librarian in a small town that has a bridge to Tamaulipas, Mexico.
-Among other things, this is where the parole officers and parolees meet every Tuesday... .
So, I was trying to find a good way to pack the spare magazine for my SIG P230 (IWB) the other day when I realized I could actually strap my Beretta Pico on my ankle with less PITA. I ran a couple reloading drills vs the time to draw the second gun and it was a wash, timewise.
Also, my total round count stayed the same.
I've carried this way for the last couple days and I'm digging it.
How 'bout you?
Rick, I think you may be over-thinking it a little. The usual reason given for having a second gun is to ensure that you have a functioning weapon in case your main weapon stops working, although losing yours in a scuffle would also be a really good reason to have a BUG. In fact, if you think losing one in a scuffle is actually a real possibility, then it would be wise to carry a BUG. As long as proper weapon retention is utilized, you shouldn't have to worry about just losing one.I live in New York, and the New York Reload isn't really an option for me. I look at it this way: if I could afford to pack to identical pistols, drop and possibly lose one, I could afford to hire a professional bodyguard. I could just imagine the paperwork involved and explaining to a Judge how my X brand pistol got lost in a scuffle. It could take years, if ever, to get my permit back.
Great idea if you're doing something high risk, like repos or stuff like that, but in my real world totally unworkable. The idea has merit, I won't deny.
I don't mind the idea of a BUG, except that I don't want to double the responsibility of keeping track of where it is all the time. Also, I am trying to add some basic medical to what I carry, I think that's more important than a second gun.
Oh, ya, knife obviously, all the time. That's a given........Or a knife.
I voted spare mag for reasons already stated
Given that both of them are small .380s, I voted 2 guns. If it was a G17 or similar and spare mag or G17 and G42, I would vote spare mag. Personally, I carry a G22 and 2 spare mags... 45 rounds of .40S&W. If I need more than that, then it just might be my day to die anyways, but I'm not going without a fight.
That's all well and good, but unfortunately, I fall into that one percent who can't afford a backup. First, I not only avoid getting into scuffles, if I do get into one, I have other tools at my disposal, starting with my walking cane. It's already served me once in an SD situation, I know how to use it pretty good.Rick, I think you may be over-thinking it a little. The usual reason given for having a second gun is to ensure that you have a functioning weapon in case your main weapon stops working, although losing yours in a scuffle would also be a really good reason to have a BUG. In fact, if you think losing one in a scuffle is actually a real possibility, then it would be wise to carry a BUG. As long as proper weapon retention is utilized, you shouldn't have to worry about just losing one.
As far as being able to afford 2 carry guns, I'd say 99% or more of American shooters could afford a BUG, unless you're talking about carrying 2 heavily customized 1911s at $2-3K each....
String? Ahhhhhhh......for a garrote. Of course! Hmmmm, interesting backup weapon.Didn't vote. I use my flashlight and multi-tool all the time, my gun-never once. I'd be more likely to carry a spare unit of
something I use more often, or maybe another tool or some string, or something.
And guns are legal in a public library in TX? I did not know thatPublic Librarian in a small town that has a bridge to Tamaulipas, Mexico.
-Among other things, this is where the parole officers and parolees meet every Tuesday... .