Bump in the night belt

Status
Not open for further replies.
I've never been in a gunfight outside of the military. What I saw in the military (I only served in specialized units) in combat- and I'm only speaking of the US personnel that were there, and not "friendly indigenous troops" was probably atypical as compared to other units. When working at close quarters, typically in structures and often in an urban setting, I saw the methodical, highly drilled tactics of shooting, moving, and communicating being performed in the same way that we trained, and trained, and trained. Were their errors and hiccups? Absolutely. However, when the distance to the enemy increased (such as an engagement in the desert) less experienced team members would sometimes not be as quick on the trigger. This was probably due to a number of reasons.
My original point was regarding untrained individuals, not trained soldiers or spec ops dudes.
 
My original point was regarding untrained individuals, not trained soldiers or spec ops dudes.
Got it. Its an interesting conversation. My guess is that based on what I have seen on the range with untrained or poorly trained individuals, is that its hard to predict what may happen when its for real. Just like any high-risk activity, expect disastrous results, but unpredictable things happen sometimes.
 
What I find somewhat interesting is that it seems most of the intruders/home-invaders/burglars who end up getting shot by homeowners are running into average citizens who typically have zero training. Here was a recent local case:
https://www.seattletimes.com/seattl...80-kills-intruder-after-he-stabs-her-husband/
http://komonews.com/news/local/im-not-just-the-typical-granny-80-year-old-shoots-kills-intruder

Note that she stated she'd only actually fired the gun once before. And this is not unusual. We (us Puget Sound area inhabitants) seem to have had a fairly significant number of criminals fired upon by armed homeowners/renters/store clerks or owners over the past two or three years -- and the reporting frequently noted, or one could read between the lines, that the armed citizen was often untrained.
 
Note that she stated she'd only actually fired the gun once before. And this is not unusual. We (us Puget Sound area inhabitants) seem to have had a fairly significant number of criminals fired upon by armed homeowners/renters/store clerks or owners over the past two or three years -- and the reporting frequently noted, or one could read between the lines, that the armed citizen was often untrained.
Why am I not surprised?

Training is my business, and I was in the Army's Training Revolution from the git-go. And I have said many times, "Training is a SOLUTION. Before we go tooting a solution, we ought to have a PROBLEM -- and ideally the proposed solution should be somehow related to the problem."

Again and again, I have pointed out some states have Constitutional Carry (no training or license required) and some have very stringent training requirements. And no one can show a difference! The stringent training requirements do not produce fewer accidents or more successful defense uses of firearms.
 
Vern Humphrey writes:

Again and again, I have pointed out some states have Constitutional Carry (no training or license required) and some have very stringent training requirements. And no one can show a difference! The stringent training requirements do not produce fewer accidents or more successful defense uses of firearms.

I agree. If anything, training (or at least, the interest many of us here have) may even reduce the number of DGUs among us, as we tend more to avoid potential scenarios in the first place, such as by hardening our homes, utilizing better situational awareness, and just being in more overall command of our personal situations, and the "layers" that would have to be breached before a gun would even come into play.

I also agree that it doesn't do much to reduce accidents. We who train handle our firearms more. That alone puts us at a higher risk than someone who has a .38 in a sock drawer that never sees the light of day, even though that "someone" seems to be who we hear about more often successfully thwarting a criminal attack with it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top