Titegroup or HP38

Status
Not open for further replies.

larry7293

Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
227
Which of these two powders would you recommend for loading light loads of 357mag and 44mag Titegroup or HP38 and why?
 
Which of these two powders would you recommend for loading light loads of 357mag and 44mag Titegroup or HP38 and why?
I use 5.0 gr. of Titegroup with a 158 gr. SWC. It makes a decent target round. I have no experience with the 44 mag.
But either will be fine I would think in 357.
 
Last edited:
I use Titegroup in my .44SPC, it's fine but runs hot. I don't think HP38/W231 would be the best choice in the .44.
 
I would use HP38. Mostly because I have a large supply. Depending on how light you mean to go, a flake powder might do better. HP38 is pretty position sensitive and low end uneven and Titegroup is not nearly as much better as they advertise.
 
Between those two, HP 38 lets you go a little slower if you're into really light loads. Personally, I use 3.8-4.0 grains of Trail Boss (using poly coated lead bullets) for a medium .38 Special level load.
 
Years ago, I used Titegroup in a pair of Ruger Super Blackhawks for cowboy action shooting. I loaded 5.0 gr behind a 200 gr RNFP for a nice mild load. It seemed consistent and accurate and cleaner burning than HP-38.
 
WST or Competition for light loads, W-231/HP-38 for medium loads. Titegroup was advertised as position insensitive when it came out and it burns well and shoots good as far as that goes, but when it comes losing velocity when the powder is away from the primer it is average for me. WST or Competition will do better as far as that goes ans works great for light loads in .357 cases where you also have lots of empty space. I don't load light like that for .44 Mag, but it's the same thing.

Lots of people like Titegroup, and load it light, so if HP-38 and Titegroup are what you have, TG may be better for real light loads.
 
For 1/2 to say 3/4 of full velocity loads, I'd give HP-38/WW231 the nod. A bit better load density, not as peaky as I understand, a little easier to see in the case perhaps, and I like the pressure curve of it better - Figure between Bullseye and Unique in actual use, and a very nice propellant for lead bullets in my experience. It is a bit "dirty", even when pressed a bit, leaving behind unburned granules. As mentioned if going really light, TG might serve you better, but HP-38/WW231 has been around a very long time, doing a great job with a wide variety of components loaded to a wide range of velocities.

FWIW, I knew a commercial loader who used WW231 for all of his commercial .44 Mag loads, using 240 grain cast bullets he produced. Loaded them right around 1000 fps as I recall.

I don't have 200 gr cast test data, but I did test some 190 grain LSWC with 9 grains of HP-38/WW231 in my 6.5" Model 29, and got:

1163 1115 1096 1142 using CCI 300 primers

OK by me for such a light bullet, and kinda low load density. Good luck.
 
Not a big fan of Titegroup and I did not care for it at all with lead but lot's of people like it.
I don't have a .44 (I do have .357) but between the two I would choose HP38.
The best choice might be follow Walkalongs advice and try one of the two he mentioned.
From looking at his powder forward/powder back test threads some powders seem to do lots better than others.
 
Titegroup is a fairly fast burning powder, meaning you won't get max velocity.
But if you're lookin for a lower recoil load, it'll do very nicely.
 
Not fond of Titegroup with lead bullets but use it in light .357 loads using jacketed or plated bullets.
 
I don't either. Always seemed to make a mess of my barrel but I shoot a lot in a hurry. I always blamed it on to much heat because it seems to have a high temp burn rate. It sure seems to heats up my barrels up a lot faster than other powders do.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top