Do younger shooters buy revolvers?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm 37, and I own more revolvers than semiautomatic pistols. I just shoot them better. I keep a .380 in my pocket in the summer, but as soon as the jacket goes on, the .357 slides on my belt. Prefer my accuracy, the "safety", and the heft of a steel revolver over my plastic 9.

Now I'll do my best not to step up on a soapbox, but time and the perception of "older" and "younger" is skewed the more age you get under your belt. Millenials is a term that gets tossed around a lot. Many times in a fairly dismissive way. I think that's a bit unfair.

I consider myself a proto millennial. Or, one of my generation's older members who dodged several bullets that younger folks of this generation have had to deal with. Keep in mind, Generation Z is just now of voting age. Gen Y (Millennials) are all in their later 20s to late 30s. Folks my age were heavily impacted by the financial crisis but could at least weather the storm as we were working when it hit. We weren't saddled with massive student loans chasing a dream that our parents had but was just out of reach like these young professionals in the sub 30 age range. There were actually jobs waiting for us in 2003. 9/11 happened and people around my age of 21 were on a college/career path in our 20s and mostly watched the fight from our classrooms and offices. People a couple years younger than I walked for their high school diploma then walked into the recruiters office and went to war.

"They play the vidya games and buy those types of guns because of it!" Well, so what? First of all, gaming is a multibillion dollar industry, and has been a mainstream staple of the American living room since 1985. I actually play a bit myself and still manage to run a business, check my daughter's homework, and even change a flat tire;). Its a relaxing hobby that is cost effective and doesn't eat into what little leisure time I have. Also how many of you guys have an 1873 or lever gun in your collection because you watched John Wayne movies as a kid? A Mare's leg, maybe complete with 45-70 cartridges that won't fit it:D Hell, I will always love the M9 because as a kid who grew up watching 80s movies, that was MY 1911/1873.

Sorry. I'm off the rails here. I really do apologize. Im not attacking the OP at all, and I appreciate his question, as I do think revolvers are falling a bit out of vogue with current generations. However, I get a bit more of a vibe from some that there is something wrong with a younger generation that is different from your own. It's a pet peeve of my mine even though I feel more in tune with Gen X than I do Gen Y. I just hate seeing them get dumped on.

What I am getting at is that people buy what they want to buy and it is probably more cyclical than you realize. Due to the CCW craze, most guns sold are going to lightweight .380s and pocket 9s. Revolvers are generally regulated to recreation or hunting sidearms. That said, I could totally see a new breath for the humble wheel gun in the near future. Much like their rediscovery of vinyl records and film photography, I could see a new generation of gun owners appreciating the fine mechanical merits of the revolver for target shooting even if less people actively hunt.

Now, I am a revolver guy. I prefer them over the semi autos. However, I will admit that for most modern applications a bottom feeder fits more roles. Folks who buy wheel guns over semis just prefer them.
 
In 2015 US manufacturers produced 885,259 revolvers. Production of revolvers has increased every year since 2005. From 1986 through 2005 US production of revolvers decreased from 761,414 to 274,205.
The trend seems to be upward. Someone is buying them and it ain't all the old farts.
Numbers from the ATF 2017 report on firearms commerce in the USA.

As an aside, nobody is trying to ban revolvers (or lever guns)
 
I'm part of the under 40 crowd. I was out looking for a SW 36 this afternoon actually. When I was a kid in the 90s I saw the spaghetti westerns for the first time so I grew up wanting a SAA but I also wanted an M-16. I love my automatics for serious use and enjoy them for fun, but most on my age group are auto all the way. My introduction to wheel guns was purely defensive in nature but I've branched out to a 686, SAA clone, and a 61 Navy.
 
Well some of us do! I'm 27, and I can't get enough of revolvers right now. I'm still half tempted to offload my 1911's for a few more revolvers. My friends have started aquiring revolvers after shooting mine. They like they're plastic guns well enough, but man do the smile when the shoot a wheel gun. The model 60 is my CCW. Traded a Glock for gp100 and a p01 for that Blackhawk.
View attachment 808089

I like that Model 60. I saw a used 3" Model 60 yesterday that's calling to me, but I'm Not Sure I can afford it now
 
I love revolvers, but my DA shooting skills are sub par due to lack of practice. My SA and auto pistol shooting skills are far better.

As others have stated, a new semi auto is a lot cheaper than a new revolver so I can see why many new shooters choose autos.

I see posts all the time where someone says why have 5 shot revolver when you can have so many more rounds in a semi auto. I have never felt under gunned when carrying a 5 shot revolver
 
I'm 36 and own roughly twice as many revolvers as semi-autos. I have been buying revolvers (mostly used) since I was 21. I haven't bought many lately, but that is only because I have been feeding a relatively recent (and expensive) addiction to Swiss P210s.

I mostly collect pre-model number S&W .44 Special Hand Ejectors and have a number of examples of 1st, 2nd, and 3rd Model HEs. While I have only a limited interest in current production revolvers, I did recently buy a new Manurhin MR73 that I consider to be the finest .357 in my collection, besting my 1969 Python, Colt "357", & S&W pre-27. Lately I have been considering a Freedom Arms 83, so perhaps that will be next.
 
I love revolvers, but my DA shooting skills are sub par due to lack of practice. My SA and auto pistol shooting skills are far better.

As others have stated, a new semi auto is a lot cheaper than a new revolver so I can see why many new shooters choose autos.

I see posts all the time where someone says why have 5 shot revolver when you can have so many more rounds in a semi auto. I have never felt under gunned when carrying a 5 shot revolver
In some of my 5 shot revolvers it's not smart to carry all 5 anyway just like I don't carry 6 in my SAAs. I do keep a full 5 in the speed loader for the five rounder since if I'm in a field reload situation the hammer will be resting on a spent cartridge when I pause. In that case it's 4 then 5 & 5.
 
Sistema1927 writes:

Yep, my first handgun purchase, on my 21st birthday, was a revolver. But that was a lifetime ago.

You beat me by a day. Mine, also a revolver, was the day after I turned 21. Also a long time ago...
 
I’m 38, so just outside the Millennial range.
My first pistol was a used 686 2 1/2”. I was working as a ranch hand at the time and a revolver just seemed “right”.
I sold it to my Dad to buy a Glock 23 and waited about 20 years to buy another revolver.
I bought a 4” GP 100 last year and have really enjoyed carrying it hunting. Again it just seems right.
 
revolvers are ugly, and thats all. Sure they used to not be, but modern double actions for a while were hideous. Full lugs, weird grips made of plastic, strange sights. Expensive, 357 mag mass produced factory loads are nearly the same as 9mm. Now, if half lugs, and Roper grips made a return, along with normal size adjustable sights, at around $600, that would be great. If 357 went back to 700FtLb, that would be too. I do love the GP, but wish I could still get a security six. S/W may have had some good stuff but no one keeps them in stock> just the same overweight, awkward, boat anchor shooting $27/box "9mm long rimmed". Single action is different, but thats a specialty market.
 
In some of my 5 shot revolvers it's not smart to carry all 5 anyway just like I don't carry 6 in my SAAs. I do keep a full 5 in the speed loader for the five rounder since if I'm in a field reload situation the hammer will be resting on a spent cartridge when I pause. In that case it's 4 then 5 & 5.
What brand(s), model(s), and how old? I can't think of a single post-war DA 5-shot revolver that wouldn't be safe carrying 5.
 
Some young folks will decide they need to collect their brass. When they get tired of chasing brass expelled to the four winds by a semi-auto, they will begin to embrace a revolver.:)

I like shooting my semi-autos but frequently the decision of what to shoot on a particular day is determined by how much I want to chase brass. (Some of my semi-autos drop brass in a nice pile near my feet, some semi-autos are connected to the Bermuda Triangle).

P.S., I'm a young 65.
 
34 years old here. I have 4 handguns, 3 ov which are revolvers(lcr, 1892 Webley WG, and uberti 1860army repro), so yeah I'm definitely more into them. Even my autoloader is a colt mustang, which is pretty much a baby 1911, so I have that oldschool streak in my preferences. To me, I just like the way they look and feel better than I do those newfangled autoloaders. I would say that younger buyers are indeed less inclined to go for revolvers however.
 
Its about 50/50 with my friends, im under 30. I would say pistols are still 2:1 however. Blackhawk 357s and 357 smiths. A lot of young people’s first handgun is a glock 19.

I would say its the 1911 guys that need to be worried.

HB
 
I have seen one significant (at least to me) trend. Twenty, thirty years ago it looked like Smith and Colt were ready to simply abandon the revolver market. Today both still have new models in their catalogs as well as Smith having their heritage lines that draw on past successes.
Excellent insight along with the ATF numbers. Revolvers are hard to beat for outdoor usuage, snubs are still popular, and people seem to have more disposible income that 1970. Most of my friend group’s stupid (fun) purchases happened after college when we had cash and no real responsiblities or sense.
 
I was in an Academy the other day and noticed this. They have decent selection of guns at good prices, but of course they can only do that by stocking the best selling models. It's the Wal-Mart business strategy. Anyway, the Academy had row after row of plastic Glock clones in their pistol case, lots of 1911s, and out of maybe 30-50 handguns, I only saw 3 revolvers: some little NAA .22 derringer, a pocket-sized LCR and a full size GP100. Don't recall seeing any other hammer fired pistols either, except for maybe a CZ.

So if I had to guess what's selling, I'd say it's not wheelguns. And that's not just for younger shooters, that's for everyone in general.

I prefer revolvers over autos personally, but the Glocks have totally taken over the duty market that was occupied by DA 357s 30 or 40 years ago (as well as the "tactical Timmy" type of shooters who all want duty guns - a generation ago those were probably the same guys doing speedloader drills and practicing DA rapid fire strings), and the low cost of both semi-auto pistols and ammo sucks in a lot of plinkers. $300 will get me a Smith or a Ruger 9mm that will run like a top on $9/box Wolf all day - I don't even think Rossi sells revolvers that cheap any more, and 38 Spl is like $18/50.

I wouldn't say that revolvers are dying, I'd just say they've become more of "gun enthusiast" type of guns. The sort of guys with a safe full of 50 guns will have several revolvers and will keep on buying some more, but the plinkers and poor-man's shooters who own more like a half dozen guns will have a Glock if they have anything, and the kind of people who own 1-2 guns solely for hunting or home defense probably won't have a revolver either. I haven't seen stats or figures, but I'm willing to bet that those last 3 groups of people make up most of the gun-owning public, which is why stores like Academy would cater to them.
 
Last edited:
What brand(s), model(s), and how old? I can't think of a single post-war DA 5-shot revolver that wouldn't be safe carrying 5.

Depends on which war it's post of.

Smith & Wesson DA model 4 made around 1903. So post-Spanish American War.

The SAAs are the J. P. Sauer made Hawes Import Western Marshall model. They are likely 1960s made.
 
Last edited:
I'm almost 50, and I'm really more of a semiauto guy, though I do own a revolver. I'm also about to make a whole lot of generalizations in what I'm about to say. For younger shooters, particularly ones who are buying their first pistols, or who did not grow up shooting, I think their concept of "pistol" is naturally a semiauto. In their lifetimes, very few revolvers are used in movies (as opposed to the 1940s and 1950s). In their lifetimes, the police have always carried semiautos. So when they think, "I want to buy a pistol," their first thoughts are to buy a semiauto. As these shooters learn more about pistols, they learn more about revolvers and eventually it dawns on them that a revolver just might be a viable option.

So, there's Spats' 2 cents, worth exactly what y'all paid for it. :D
 
As for cheap ammo yep, I popped into WM yesterday for 100 rounds of 115gr 9mm Federal aluminum @ $17.97

50 rounds of .38spl were a few bucks more than the 100 round box.

I do believe every gun guy should have one SA revolver just for fun but the snubbies and DA duty guns really don’t have a place in today’s world.
 
I do believe every gun guy should have one SA revolver just for fun but the snubbies and DA duty guns really don’t have a place in today’s world.

Yet there those snubbies and DA revolvers are, and often in daily carry in today's world. I have never felt under-protected when carrying a wheel gun; even when just a 22. Now I have felt under-protected when carrying a 22 semi-auto simply due to feed reliability issues and lack of a second strike capability.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top