44 Special Shooters chime in

Status
Not open for further replies.
Early Bulldog, Rossi 720, and a Smith 24-3. Just sold a 2 1/2" CA Bulldog.
Had a earlier model 24 no dash, butt.............. also had 2 Lew Horton's, one 3" round butt, second a 4" square butt. In a moment of stupidity I sold them and have regretted it every since. Ran across a Lew Horton 3" round butt at the show here this last weekend, little short of change. I'm save up and I know where it is. If I can pick that one up it will put me on the road to recovery for my earlier sins. Gotta love the Special.
 
I've never owned a revolver chambered for .44 Special, but I own two S&W Model 29-2s, in 4" and 6".

Other than for testing of a barrel repair/replacement, I've shot almost nothing but .44 Specials in it. For home defense, I use the Speer 200gr. Gold Dot 200gr. JHP load. My avatar is a picture of the 4" gun and what that load can do one handed at 50'.
 
In fall of 1996 S&W brought out the 696 L frame .44 Spl. I bought the first one I saw. I shoulda bought about 4 of them seeing the stupid prices people are paying for one now. It is my main carry gun and I will never sell it.
 
Howdy

Mu 44 Specials tend to be a little bit older.

You make me just ill with jealousy. That's the nicest collection of .44 Specials I've seen. One I use quite a bit is a 2nd Model target. Since I acquired mine in a reblued condition, and it needed a bit of action work, I don't feel as if it's a crime against history to drop it into a holster and carry it occasionally.

For carry, I had to put a set of Herret grips on it. The original tiny grips will cause your gun to rust. Shoot them enough and you'll bleed all over the bluing, even with a mild cartridge like the .44 Special.
 
I own five revolvers chambered for the 44 Special round. Two Ruger GP 100 in stainless steel with 3” barrels. One blue steel Ruger GP 100 with a 5” barrel and two model 624 Smith & Wesson revolvers, one with a 4” barrel and one with a 6 & 1/2” barrel. All are super accurate and very pleasant to shoot. My go to cast load is a coated 210 RNFP from Missouri Bullet Company over 7.7 grains of Unique, Winchester primers. My guess is around 850 fps. My jacketed bullet loads are both Hornady XTP bullets 180 and 200 grain versions. I load the 180 grain bullets over 10.4 grains of Accurate Arms No. 5 with Federal magnum primers. The 200 grain is loaded over 8.0 grains of Power Pistol with Winchester primers. The 180 grain load will run at 1000 fps out of a 3” barrel. The 200 grain will do around 850 fps. For CCW I would select either the Speer GDHP or a Winchester Silvertip with bullets not heavier than 200 grains.

A word of caution to the S&W model 624 owners. In the mid 80s Smith & Wesson issued a recall on the 624. They were notified by their steel supplier that 14 bars of steel used to manufacture cylinders were not to spec and could result in a catastrophic failure. Smith issued a recall and fitted any defective revolvers with new cylinders. When they did, they stamped the original box with a red circular stamp. Just discovered the recall when I purchased my 6.5” 624 last month. Today there are no replacement cylinders available. If you do not know if your model 624 has been inspected you best call Smith & Wesson. I called them last month on the two 624s I own. Neither had been inspected and both were manufactured at the time when the defective steel was in use. Got both guns back in 10 days and both passed. S&W paid the shipping both ways. My guess is that if either or both guns had proven defective Smith & Wesson would not have returned them. That said I am sure they would have either replaced the guns or paid me for them. Either way, I didn’t care. I’m not interested in shooting a handgun that could explode and I could not in good conscience have sold them to anyone knowing that they may be dangerous. I got lucky this time. My advice is not to take any chances!
 
I shoot my Ruger SA 44 mag. revolvers & my Marlin 1894 (also 44 Mag) almost weekly. My load is 8 grains of Win 231 pushing a 200 grain lead bullet. This is a 44 Special load & I enjoy it immensely. It is accurate, has little recoil especially in the rifle and aside from being deadly on two legged offenders it would work quite well on any medium sized game animals as far as 100 yards and maybe a little more. I will be looking for a good used DA 44 Mag revolver soon & will be shooting the same load.
 
Howdy

Mu 44 Specials tend to be a little bit older.

Like this S&W 44 Hand Ejector 1st Model (Triple Lock). It left the factory in 1907. The SN is below 200. Hardly any blue left on it anywhere, and the checkering is almost completely worn off the grips, but I got it for a terrific price. And it still shoots great with my mild 44 Special loads.

View attachment 836822




There are some blemishes on this nickle plated Triple Lock, but the grips are in pretty good shape. It left the factory towards the end of production in 1915.

View attachment 836823




This Target Model Triple Lock left the factory in 1913.

View attachment 836824




A 44 Hand Ejector 2nd Model that left the factory in 1921.

View attachment 836825




44 Hand Ejector 3rd Model (Model of 1926) that shipped in 1929. It was carried by an officer throughout WWII. I even got his beat up holster with it. Yes, it has been refinished, and not a great job at that, but I love this old Smith. It is the first 44 Special revolver I bought.

View attachment 836826




44 Hand Ejector 4th Model Target. I was looking for a Model 24 for the longest time. They are scarce as hen's teeth. When I found this 4th Model, which left the factory in 1955 I stopped looking for a Model 24.

View attachment 836827




Almost a Model 24, this Model 624 shipped in 1985, my newest 44 Special. I picked it up during my quest for a Model 24. It originally came with oversized target grips, but I put these Magnas on it instead. Very easy to manage recoil with my mild 44 Specials and the small Magna grips.

View attachment 836828




Here is something you don't see everyday. A Colt Bisley chambered for 44 Special. That's because Colt never chambered the Bisley model for 44 Special. At some point this one had a 2nd Generation barrel and cylinder fitted, and fancy new grips too. It originally shipped in 1908. I have no idea what it was chambered for back then, but definitely not 44 Special. This is my only single action 44 Special, I have some work to do trying to catch up with Bob Wright.

View attachment 836829
 
Hi...
I have three .44Spl revolvers...
A Taurus stainless 5 shot with adjustable sights, a Uberti SAA clone and a Lipsey's Ruger flat top.

I am a big fan... Don't know if it's my favorite cartridge, though.
That tends to be the one I am shooting at any given time.
 
I'm a younger and more recent member to the cult of 44 special. It started with my getting a Charter Bulldog Jan of 2018, I then bought a S&W 629 4" a few months later. Shooting factory ammo was killing me so I got into reloading Feb of this year, been playing around with the round ever since. For the time being I'm sticking to 240 grain bullets, mostly Hi-Tek from Missouri. My loads have ranged from 5-7.5 grains of Unique.

The GP100 is definitely on my short list to pick up, I want one badly.

The nice thing about a 44 Magnum is you can shoot 44 Special level loads and then full power 44 Magnum loads if you want.

I like 44 Special revolvers and have several, but I do have a couple 44 Magnum revolvers. I do not think my 44 Magnum revolvers have seen a full power load since they have been in my possession. I'm just not into full power loads these days but I do enjoy shooting the revolvers.

One of my idiosyncrasies is I shoot cases designed for the chamber of the gun in the gun. (44 Magnum guns get 44 Magnum cases, 44 Special guns get 44 Special cases, etc.) One of the advantages of reloading I can do that. I have plenty of cases for both cartridges that I do not have to share them between guns.

So, enjoy your 44 caliber guns, Special or Magnum, and shoot what ammunition makes you happy.
 
A word of caution to the S&W model 624 owners. In the mid 80s Smith & Wesson issued a recall on the 624. They were notified by their steel supplier that 14 bars of steel used to manufacture cylinders were not to spec and could result in a catastrophic failure. Smith issued a recall and fitted any defective revolvers with new cylinders. When they did, they stamped the original box with a red circular stamp. Just discovered the recall when I purchased my 6.5” 624 last month. Today there are no replacement cylinders available. If you do not know if your model 624 has been inspected you best call Smith & Wesson. I called them last month on the two 624s I own. Neither had been inspected and both were manufactured at the time when the defective steel was in use. Got both guns back in 10 days and both passed. S&W paid the shipping both ways. My guess is that if either or both guns had proven defective Smith & Wesson would not have returned them. That said I am sure they would have either replaced the guns or paid me for them. Either way, I didn’t care. I’m not interested in shooting a handgun that could explode and I could not in good conscience have sold them to anyone knowing that they may be dangerous. I got lucky this time. My advice is not to take any chances!

Thanks to whatnickname for bringing the recall up.

Everyone with a S&W Model 624 should do their "do diligence" concerning their revolver and this recall.
 
A word of caution to the S&W model 624 owners. In the mid 80s Smith & Wesson issued a recall on the 624. They were notified by their steel supplier that 14 bars of steel used to manufacture cylinders were not to spec and could result in a catastrophic failure. Smith issued a recall and fitted any defective revolvers with new cylinders. When they did, they stamped the original box with a red circular stamp. Just discovered the recall when I purchased my 6.5” 624 last month. Today there are no replacement cylinders available. If you do not know if your model 624 has been inspected you best call Smith & Wesson. I called them last month on the two 624s I own. Neither had been inspected and both were manufactured at the time when the defective steel was in use. Got both guns back in 10 days and both passed. S&W paid the shipping both ways. My guess is that if either or both guns had proven defective Smith & Wesson would not have returned them. That said I am sure they would have either replaced the guns or paid me for them. Either way, I didn’t care. I’m not interested in shooting a handgun that could explode and I could not in good conscience have sold them to anyone knowing that they may be dangerous. I got lucky this time. My advice is not to take any chances!


Howdy Again

Thanks for the caution. I forget exactly when I bought my Model 624, but it was probably about ten years ago. Shortly after I bought it I heard about the problem with 624 cylinders. I called up S&W at that time and they told me mine was OK.
 
Howdy

Mu 44 Specials tend to be a little bit older.

Like this S&W 44 Hand Ejector 1st Model (Triple Lock). It left the factory in 1907. The SN is below 200. Hardly any blue left on it anywhere, and the checkering is almost completely worn off the grips, but I got it for a terrific price. And it still shoots great with my mild 44 Special loads.

View attachment 836822




There are some blemishes on this nickle plated Triple Lock, but the grips are in pretty good shape. It left the factory towards the end of production in 1915.

View attachment 836823




This Target Model Triple Lock left the factory in 1913.

View attachment 836824




A 44 Hand Ejector 2nd Model that left the factory in 1921.

View attachment 836825




44 Hand Ejector 3rd Model (Model of 1926) that shipped in 1929. It was carried by an officer throughout WWII. I even got his beat up holster with it. Yes, it has been refinished, and not a great job at that, but I love this old Smith. It is the first 44 Special revolver I bought.

View attachment 836826




44 Hand Ejector 4th Model Target. I was looking for a Model 24 for the longest time. They are scarce as hen's teeth. When I found this 4th Model, which left the factory in 1955 I stopped looking for a Model 24.

View attachment 836827




Almost a Model 24, this Model 624 shipped in 1985, my newest 44 Special. I picked it up during my quest for a Model 24. It originally came with oversized target grips, but I put these Magnas on it instead. Very easy to manage recoil with my mild 44 Specials and the small Magna grips.

View attachment 836828




Here is something you don't see everyday. A Colt Bisley chambered for 44 Special. That's because Colt never chambered the Bisley model for 44 Special. At some point this one had a 2nd Generation barrel and cylinder fitted, and fancy new grips too. It originally shipped in 1908. I have no idea what it was chambered for back then, but definitely not 44 Special. This is my only single action 44 Special, I have some work to do trying to catch up with Bob Wright.

View attachment 836829
Always gotta watch threads like this cause DJ is gonna post pics and I never get tired of lookin
 
I've owned several 44 Specials over the years. Smith and Wesson, Taurus, and Charter. Being a incurable gun trader, they'd all gone on down the road until I had none. Same went for 44 Magnums.

A couple of weeks ago a buddy wanted a Smith and Wesson 22 I had. I offered it to him, he accepted my price. Then I noticed he had a Lippsy's 44 Special Flat Top,Bisley Blackhawk with a 5" barrel for sale at the same price. I still had all my reloaoding stuff for 44 Special, so I proposed a trade, He agreed, and this virtually unfired SS Ruger, with box, papers, and all that stuff came to me.

Ruger44_zpswmbri60h.jpg

Ruger44a_zpsw6lhxenk.jpg

Then a couple of days later, I walk into my LGS, and lo and behold they have another like new one, in the box, papers, and such, on sale. But this one was in blue. I like blue guns more than I like stainless, so the blue one came home. I'll probably sell the SS one, one of these days. If not, I've just got two of them.

RugerB44r_zpssgc5omhd.jpg

RugerbL_zps2dgvtgxv.jpg
 
Like this S&W 44 Hand Ejector 1st Model (Triple Lock)

I'd bet that old triple lock has seen a bunch of history. I like shooting 44 Specials and 44 Specials in 44 Magnum revolvers .There was a thread here no too long ago with a very similar topic. Looked up some history on two of the bullets popular for 44 caliber guns. The bullets were a Lyman 215gr. and a 255gr. Both bullets were designed by the same individual. These gas check bullets were introduced in 1952. To me, that meant that people were loading the 44 Specials to higher pressures when the 44 Magnum was just a dream. I got a 624 Smith and a early 60's vintage Model 29 4" that is used as a 44 Special. Several Bulldogs have gone through these hands. I have no plans to stop loading for and shooting my 44 Specials.

Addendum: I sent by 624 back on the original recall some time in the 1980's. At that time there were no extra cylinders. As the same time the original front sight was replaced with a Patridge blade.The 624 passed the inspection.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top