300 PRC for hunting?

Status
Not open for further replies.

labnoti

Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2018
Messages
1,892
Ok, low-drag is pretty obviously the name of the game for long range precision shooting, but what does it do for hunting? Hunters have been using high-drag big-bore projectiles for centuries and while they probably limit the ethical range to a couple of hundred yards, that's always been a part of hunting for sport. High-powered, small-bore cartridges became prevalent, especially in the latter half of the last century and with boat-tailed ballistic tips, they have the potential to extend the range of ethical hunting to 4, 5, maybe 6 hundred yards. At those ranges, there is a lot more than ballistics involved in ensuring a quick, clean kill, but the other benefit of those early magnums was that they shot flat. MPBR for a six-inch kill-zone could be well past 350 yards with an elk gun. It meant that you never had to fuss with a laser rangefinder, a fancy BDC reticle or elevation adjustments on a long-range precision style turret.

Then came along extreme low-drag hunting bullets. The greatest benefit they provided was not extending the range out to 7, 8, 9 hundred yards, but making 4 hundred yard shots possible without excessive recoil of the old-school magnums. They're great, but they also sold a lot of laser rangefinders and fancy long-range scopes. But now, as it would seem to have been inevitable, we have low-drag in magnum-sized cases and in larger calibers. What's the point of this? One thing the low-drag bullets aren't is lightweight. They're always long and heavy-for-caliber, and that means slow and arcing. So we're still stuck with rangefinders and precision turrets but now we're hitting game with 3000 ft-lbs of energy instead of 2000, and with larger calibers. Did game get tougher?

Is it to make 700-yard shots on elk? Is it just because we can? Is it as the cynic suspects, just to sell more rifles, rangefinders, optics and reloading gear? Is this going to mean we get a 30-30 and 270 Winchester season like we get a black-powder season?
 
The way I was brought up to hunt was to spot and stock game to within 200 yards before a shot was fired. Anything farther than that to me signifies a lazy and or unskilled hunter, sheep, goat, and antelope hunting being the exception. Ive seen enough gut-shot caribou. Hunting is hunting, not long range target shooting. Getting close is part of the game, and you owe it to the animal. Just My Opinion!
 
Hunting is about getting a target animal to reveal itself in a location where an ethical killing shot can reliably be made. Whether that’s 50yrds or 500, it’s really not so complicated.

The 30 cal magnums are becoming a bit of a no-man’s-land for me. Until the upper end of the 300 RUM, I would rather jump up to a larger case and larger caliber for longer range hunting. Not to say I think the 300 PRC or WM or WSM can’t kill elk as far as I’d ever want to shoot, just that I’d rather anchor the game more quickly, and when I’m hauling a 30lb rifle anyway, mo’butta is mo’betta.
 
Last edited:
I downsized to 308 as my go-to cartridge over 10 years ago. With high BC bullets it is moving faster and hitting harder at 175 yards than old school 300 WM loads with poor BC bullets. With almost 1/2 the recoil. Yea, the 300 still shoots flatter, but not enough to matter at the ranges I have the skills to shoot.

Being honest about our own skills is the key. My 308 with good loads is more than adequate for even elk size game beyond 400 yards. That is farther than I will take a shot at game. A bigger gun may be better, but is wasted with my skills.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top