ECVMatt
Member
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2004
- Messages
- 2,834
And it is really nice. I won't get to shoot it for a couple of weeks so I will withhold any definitive judgement until then.
A couple of observations:
It is very nicely made. I have some light casting lines, but the action is smooth and the gun is tight.
There is a slight gap where the grips meet the frame, but those will be gone soon so no worries.
I really like the sight picture; it is well done and easy to use.
The trigger is acceptable for what it is. I will play with it a bit to see if I can improve it.
A couple of random thoughts:
Not to start the whole RR vs Wrangler thing again, but the Wrangle feels like a real gun. I checked out a RR while I was doing my background and they just feel cheap. I know they work, but they do not have the same quality feel of the Ruger.
If Ruger could pull this off in a +P .38 Spl, it would make a very nice trail gun. I hope they are able to build off this concept.
I will post an update after I shoot it and hope my observations stay the same.
A couple of observations:
It is very nicely made. I have some light casting lines, but the action is smooth and the gun is tight.
There is a slight gap where the grips meet the frame, but those will be gone soon so no worries.
I really like the sight picture; it is well done and easy to use.
The trigger is acceptable for what it is. I will play with it a bit to see if I can improve it.
A couple of random thoughts:
Not to start the whole RR vs Wrangler thing again, but the Wrangle feels like a real gun. I checked out a RR while I was doing my background and they just feel cheap. I know they work, but they do not have the same quality feel of the Ruger.
If Ruger could pull this off in a +P .38 Spl, it would make a very nice trail gun. I hope they are able to build off this concept.
I will post an update after I shoot it and hope my observations stay the same.