Ruger Wrangler Review

Status
Not open for further replies.

Skylerbone

Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2010
Messages
7,141
Location
Hawkeye East
i know several other reviews have been posted so I’ll try focusing on my thoughts rather than summarizing features and specifications.

The box. Ugly as they were I miss the old Yellow Ruger boxes made of actual cardboard and not this cheap imitation lightweight packaging. Nitpicking to be sure, but this one will have to be stored at the top of the stack to survive. I won’t give a deduction as the price point doesn’t really facilitate adding .03 extra for all that color ink. Too bad they don’t save the money spent on the padlock and give us a plastic case but I digress.

Surprisingly nice. That is what I thought when the Wrangler emerged from its plastic bag. Not that I expected to have wasted my $180 on junk, just better than I imagined is all. Sure the metal could be better under the Ceracoat finish or Ruger could have opted for nicer grips; I get it, they’re looking to make money. Would I buy it again? You bet as this is one of the few times I’ve purchased a new model sight unseen.

How did it feel. In a word, cheap. It felt good in hand in terms of fit and I appreciated the checkering on the plastic stocks but they, along with the reduced weight, really did give the Wrangler a cheap feel. Night and day. That was the difference IMO between the included stocks and the set I had sitting in a box from my Single-Six. That cheap feel disappeared even as I listened to the transfer bar rattle around after cocking the MIM hammer.

What the Wrangler lacks in old world craftsmanship it makes up for in both utility and price. If you’re even a little curious I’d say stop overthinking things and buy one or two ASAP and go have some fun.


4F85DD79-6B85-4BF4-BFD5-9625FA8D8378.jpeg


F4963804-078F-40FD-941E-29B5BED4B168.jpeg


CA466F03-17F4-42BB-80A5-0538223D9707.jpeg


E0166430-B0CB-440B-A7C4-288C2303DC0A.jpeg


D7CB2203-D1A8-4F0C-B59E-12115CD68283.jpeg


1AA0D930-2CE5-4D7B-B512-37E399459918.jpeg
 
That seems like a honest summary from a genuine perspective. :thumbup:

You must not have shot it yet?

How's the balance and point ability compared to the SS?

It's got to feel completely different but that doesn't necessarily mean better, worse, or even 'same but different'; if you know what I mean.
 
Too bad they don’t save the money spent on the padlock and give us a plastic case but I digress.

As for the lock, I believe it's federal law. Probably as cheaply made as the gun.

How did it feel. In a word, cheap. ]

The impression I got when I handled one. Almost felt like a toy gun in my large hands. Still, for under $200 OTD, what more can one expect? As least it isn't unwieldy and clunky.

I've considered getting one for my grandkids to shoot, not a huge investment and they probably would get a lot of use from it.
 
Last edited:
Sklyerbone

Nice, up-front, and personal review!

I still haven't laid eyes on one yet so I must get by on other's impressions til I have a chance to handle it myself. Good to see that factory grips will fit on it as I really don't care for those plastic ones that comes with it.
 
You must not have shot it yet?

How's the balance and point ability compared to the SS?

It's got to feel completely different but that doesn't necessarily mean better, worse, or even 'same but different'; if you know what I mean.

I haven’t had a chance to shoot it yet, range was closed for Bullseye. Balance is right at the center of the trigger guard and it points naturally (for me). Reach is the same as a Single so the Wrangler is not completely foreign in hand.

I still prefer the heft of the SS but I think the Wrangler would be an ideal holstered companion. I confess my Single-Six should have been a Bearcat to train those with smaller hands but I’m still a little selfish when it comes to buying firearms that fit me. I’ve already informed the wife that this one is hers and, if it shoots respectably, I’ll be looking to order a second.
 
The impression I got when I handled one. Almost felt like a toy gun in my large hands. Still, for under $200 THD, what more can one expect? As least it isn't unwieldy and clunky.

I know the feeling. With XXL hands I have a habit of seeking out whatever has the biggest handle. Interestingly enough one of the Mods on here told me to try the smaller inserts on my M&P and my group size improved noticeably. With kids ranging from 10-15 I think the Wrangler is going to be a big hit and I bet your grandchildren would enjoy it as well.
 
Do the cylinder holes line up with the ejector rod when the gate is open, or do you have to hold the cylider with one hand and stroke with the other? This was always my biggest gripe with the old Single Sixes.....

The cylinder spins freely in either direction. For me, it is much easier to unload than a SingleSix. Having said that, I love single actions in general, so the whole loading/unloading thing is pretty much second nature to me.
 
Cheap guns will feel cheap, but what matters is how they shoot and how well you can shoot with it.

I'll still stick with a different cheap .22 SAA, but I'd like to see how close to POA these Wranglers shoot.
 
Cheap guns will feel cheap, but what matters is how they shoot and how well you can shoot with it.

I'll still stick with a different cheap .22 SAA, but I'd like to see how close to POA these Wranglers shoot.

I hear ya, and I was finally getting worn down by that other SA; enough so to start researching them. That’s when I found the Wrangler, quite by accident. I could have easily gone the other way but for one thing: Ruger stands behind what they sell. Maybe the other guy does too but we don’t have history. As for shooting, range day may have to wait a few days.
 
I’m having trouble getting past the cerakote finish. I understands why they do it, but I just can’t seem to embrace it on a single action revolver. Call me a traditionalist, but the should be blued or stainless.
 
I’m having trouble getting past the cerakote finish. I understands why they do it, but I just can’t seem to embrace it on a single action revolver. Call me a traditionalist, but the should be blued or stainless.

Many SA revolver traditionalists feel stainless is also a abomination.

Lotta more traditional SAs out there, made with metal that is either stainless or capable of being properly blued. Problem is, that type of manufacture is more money and is not going to appeal to those desiring a sub $200 rimfire revolver. Ruger is definitely aiming it's Wrangler sights at the Heritage buying crowd, which before this had a cornered market. Heritage provides revolvers for about the same monies that are blued, and with adjustable sights. Time will tell whether Ruger expands it's Wrangler product line to that extent.
 
Many SA revolver traditionalists feel stainless is also a abomination.

Lotta more traditional SAs out there, made with metal that is either stainless or capable of being properly blued. Problem is, that type of manufacture is more money and is not going to appeal to those desiring a sub $200 rimfire revolver. Ruger is definitely aiming it's Wrangler sights at the Heritage buying crowd, which before this had a cornered market. Heritage provides revolvers for about the same monies that are blued, and with adjustable sights. Time will tell whether Ruger expands it's Wrangler product line to that extent.

My single actions are all blued, but I can appreciate some stainless ones. If the Wrangler gets more people to appreciate shooting single action, I’m all for it.
 
I think stainless is a good no-nonsense choice. No real need to worry over hurting the finish.

I agree. Most every new gun I have bought in the last 25 year, other than shotguns, have been stainless. My guns are tools and as tools, stainless is a no brainer. That don't mean I don't appreciate the beauty of deep bluing and nice wood.

I would really like to see Ruger put out a Wrangler with decent adjustable sights. Kinda where I'm at right now when it comes to gettin' one for the grandkids. The quality I saw between the Heritage's and the little Rugers is little to none. Which means I'll probably go with a RR like this one. The LGS says I can have it for $200 OTD.......

87933_1.jpg
 
As for accuracy, I can only speak to one Wrangler I shot briefly.

I was at the range shooting the breeze with one of the ROs, when a retail guy brought a like-new Wrangler back for testing. The owner traded it back to the store, complaining that the sights were "way off" and the gun shot poorly.

I volunteered to give it a quick test to see how it shot.

The POI equaled POA precisely, and the gun's accuracy was far better than I would have expected from a gun at that price-point.

Conclusion: The gun was fine; the previous owner simply cannot shoot....

BOARHUNTER
 
Interesting that you described it as feeling cheap and like a toy. My reaction was the opposite. I was surprised by how heavy it is. 30 ounces. That is heavier than almost all 9mm pistols.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top