S&W 686 Plus Sights

Status
Not open for further replies.

Huntolive

Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2012
Messages
1,139
Location
Virginia
I have a 6 in and 7 in 686 plus 4 deer hunting and want to change the sights to something that shows up better in dim light
It was easy to find front sights or my Rugers, but it seems that finding front sight replacements for Smith & Wesson revolvers is more of a mystery at least to me.
What front sights to recommend for these revolvers and where do I find them and what is involved in replacing them please?
 
The front sight is pinned on mine. Since you’ll be using it for hunting, a scope mount may be better or at least an option. The rear sight is easy to remove and a Weaver base can be installed.
 
All I have done with my revolvers is put a base coat of white followed by whatever shade best fits your eye. In this case, a fluorescent fingernail polish that has held up for years.
20170513-190828-zps8jthc4ju.jpg
 
I'd like to think the fingernail polish thing works but I've tried that and it may help a little but not much I mean how does that make it much better than one with a red or orange insert like I already have?

thanks for the advice about putting optics but that's not the route I want to go all the all the time so if I just want a different front sight wouldn't changing out the front sight for a TruGlo hi VIs or Dawson's or something like that work better?
But what kind do you use for a Smith & Wesson 686 plus I can't seem to find the right type and what is involved in changing it out?
 
If the fluorescent nail polish can really work as well as a fiber optic sight please let me know because easy and cheap is always good if it works
 
Thanks so what is involved in installing one compared to the push in ones for a Ruger GP100 or Red hawk?
I think the Smiths maybe in with a pin on the 686?
 
Then again maybe an optic is the way to go at least on one of my 357 s

I already have an optic on one of my 454s and one of my 44s but I do want to be able to take deer with open sights that is my goal and with a barrel no longer than 6 in
 
Want to get the dawson but am unsure of sight height. Do iI measure from top of barrel or top of sight base? I get .360 from top of barrel and .272 from top of sight base.
 
Dawson's makes a great product. Their fiber optic rods are smaller than most so it's more precise. Also the top edge of the sight is a sharper cut which makes it a much cleaner sight picture. He's a Dawson's fiber optic vs a hi viz on my gp100. Highly recommend Dawson's. Some fitting will be required.
KIMG1318~2.JPG
 
I have a "Davidson's Special" Model 66 that came with these front & rear *upgrades*.

At first, I thought it an asinine idea but the more I carried it, the better I liked them. Beneficial upgrade in both low and high lighting conditions, damn tough - as it has turned out and not snaggy like I thought they'd be.
It gets carried in nature a lot. Gets shot a lot and in spite of my LOATHING the look of the front - I have to bow to the practicality.
The *V* notch rear, too, I have truly grown to appreciate.

https://www.hivizsights.com/product-category/products/handgun-sights/smith-wesson/

Todd.

IMG_1120.JPG IMG_1121.JPG IMG_1123.JPG
 
I use Testors. Unlike nail polish, people won't stare at you when you buy it

View attachment 873978
It lays on much nicer too. I found nail polish is thick to begin with and starts to setup much faster. And if you're anal about an even coat,nail polish won't be your friend. I just did 4 of my sights last night with testors. No close up pics untill it's fully cured tomorrow night. But as of this morning the coats were much more even than nail polish. The deep serations on the model 60 made the paint look factory.
KIMG1322.JPG
 
I have a "Davidson's Special" Model 66 that came with these front & rear *upgrades*.

At first, I thought it an asinine idea but the more I carried it, the better I liked them. Beneficial upgrade in both low and high lighting conditions, damn tough - as it has turned out and not snaggy like I thought they'd be.
It gets carried in nature a lot. Gets shot a lot and in spite of my LOATHING the look of the front - I have to bow to the practicality.
The *V* notch rear, too, I have truly grown to appreciate.

https://www.hivizsights.com/product-category/products/handgun-sights/smith-wesson/

Todd.

View attachment 873893 View attachment 873894 View attachment 873895
I recently picked up a 317 that came with those same sights. I had just the opposite experience with them, and quickly replaced them with a more traditional set.

For me, they were confusing and accuracy sucked with them. With the front dot in the "V", the top of the front sight wasnt aligned with the top of the notch. Add to that, the top of the front sight is rounded, and not flat.

Once I switched the front blade for a Partridge type and a square notch rear, accuracy has been much better, and they are more intuitive to shoot with.

Not saying that idea isnt a good one, just more that S&W's execution of it is pretty poor. If they were properly done, and even with the "V" notch, I could see them working. Although, for those of us more accustomed to a more traditional sight picture, a square notch would probably still be better.

I have a NAA Mini that came with a set of XS Big Dot's on them, and I dislike them as much as S&W's V notch set up. From hearing others rave about them, Im glad I didnt waste the money putting them on one of my other guns. I find them more of a distraction than a help.

I suppose a lot of this is what youre used to too. For me, three-dot night sights have always worked the best. Ive been using them since before they were lit, and they have always been fast and easy to use. But, its what Im used to. I know a lot of people dont like them.

A lot of my S&W's have the traditional notch rear, with a ramp front with the red/orange insert. Both my 686, 686P 2.5" guns came that way. I actually wish they would stop using the inserts, as they tend to be more annoying than they help. Lately, Ive been putting fluorescent orange nail polish over the insert up to the point at the top of the sight, that you see when the alignment is right. The inserts leave a slight gap at the top which gives a different alignment in different light.
The nail polish is also brighter, and easier to see in all light.

If I were to bother to switch out the sights on my remaining 686P, or any of my Smiths for that matter, Id go with a set of three-dot night sights. Keeps things simple (commonality wise), and they work well for me.

Right now though, the nail polish works well too, and its a lot cheaper.
 
I have tried V notch and U notch rear sights.
Mr Patridge was right in 1909, square is best.

Color can be helpful, though. I have painted or FO front sights on service and action handguns, black on target pistols.
 
...and it's very easy to apply with a toothpick. But it is thick enough that it will not run down the sight if not laid on too heavy.
Nice revolvers, BTW
Yup - take the tooth-pich and squish the end with finely ridged pliers and you get the pick flattened and with little cross ridges to hold more paint since re-application should be avoided if possible.

Todd.
 
Ive been painting (whole) guns with Testors since the late 60's. For the most part, it works great. The only down side to it is, things like Hoppes will take it off in short order, especially if you let it sit on the paint, or rub it with a solvent.

Nail polish on the other hand, is a lot more durable, and usually not affected by most gun cleaning solvents. Even Gun Scrubber wont usually take it off.

I just got done cleaning my one S&W that I just painted (NP) the front sight the other day. The front sight was covered in fouling and lead, including the NP, and I used Hoppes to clean it off the sight. Nail polish is still there, and looks as good as it did the other day when I painted it. If that had been Testors, and Id claned it the same way, Id be repainting it tonight.
 
Agreed. If you're gonna *roll yer own* then surgically cleaned and Testors is miles better than fingernail polish in my experience in both firearms and fishing. Also want to attend to both the paint and the sight being solidly room temperature.

Todd.

Even better if you can lightly score the surface with something like 100 grit sand paper and clean VERY well with isopropyl alcohol to ensure good adhesion.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top