Make or break characteristic of a gun. What's your dealbreaker?

Status
Not open for further replies.
You pick it up, clear it, point it in a safe direction and now what's your biggest deciding factor as to whether to buy it or put it down
Are the sights aligned with that direction? If so, do I like the feel. If not, time to find something that naturally aligns better with my grip.
 
Deal breakers?

Trigger. I don't like DAO, or DA/SA and am not a fan of hinged triggers.

Safety location (if it has one). I don't do slide mounted safeties and safeties I can't disengage as a part of my firing grip.

The rest, like grip and how it points, I can generally work around with practice.

Other things that aren't deal breakers are things like size and weight, I tend to prefer guns I can carry even for range work so I dont generally prefer guns longer or taller than a 1911 Commander, and I've been getting weary of heavy guns, so 35 oz of under, loaded, is a big plus.
 
Depends. Usually I buy online so feel in the hand isn't something I can check before hand. That said I generally am just looking for "1. Is it cool? & 2. Is it a good price/deal?". (and obviously 3 do I have the money for it)

I end up buying a decent amount of surplus pistols as they hit the market via the importers.
 
When it comes to semi-auto pistols, I don't even bother looking at any that don't have a browning-pattern control configuration (frame-mounted-DTF safety [not decocker], mag release button at bottom of trigger guard).
 
Besides my personal limits (things like DA/SA autos... which I detest...) and given that I can't actually test fire a handgun before purchase (I'm in a gun show or gun shop, right?) then...

1) Fit in my hand,
2) Lack of modifications (I don't like buggered up guns, and generally don't like basket cases or someone else's 'unfinished' projects)
3) Fit and finish... if it looks abused, it probably is.
 
The most common design error I see is manual safeties. If the gun has a manual safety, it needs to be:
1) Right side up! The safety should be switched to fire as your grip closes on your gun. The Beretta is bass-ackward.
2) Large enough/positioned so there's no question of thumb engagement during draw, at all, ever.

A mid-sized 1911 extended thumb safety is the archetypal example of perfection. If I can't have that, I'll gladly have NO manual safety.
 
A mid-sized 1911 extended thumb safety is the archetypal example of perfection. If I can't have that, I'll gladly have...

A different gun that does have it. I've got too much hard-won myelin to want to fool with anything that doesn't have that control configuration. There are plenty of choices that do.
 
If it doesn't fit my hands well, forget it.

If the trigger is stiff, forget it.

If the sights are small or hard to see, I'm very unlikely to buy it.

I'm a cheapskate with plenty of handguns. I'm not going to pay what I consider to be a high price, and I'm not going to buy a duplicate of one I already own.

That's how I ended up with my latest handgun. It fits my giant ape hands very well. The trigger is surprisingly light and smooth. The sights are large and easy to see. It was sitting at the LGS for a long time, so my friend let me have it "for what he was into it for" (probably what he gave for it in trade for something else). I didn't already own a Ruger Redhawk. SOLD!

And yeah, it's a great shooter. :)

 
Last edited:
On semi-autos, the one thing that is absolutely a deal breaker is a manual safety. I've trained too long on revolvers and Glocks.

Really liked the Sig P-938 I rented at the range, but the safety put the kibosh on it.
 
I have a habit of encouraging projects to follow me home. Therefore the bar for a “dealbreaker” is pretty low w me, as long as priced accordingly.

Otherwise, not being able to try a trigger or (sometimes) not being allowed to inspect reasonably is a deal breaker.

Less about the gun, more about the people selling.
 
It depends on what the gun is for. If it’s just a range toy, that’s one thing, I’ll let many things slide. Mainly I have to have the extra cash and like the way the gun looks.

If it’s a carry gun that’s a totally different story, a manual safety is a no go, being solid black gives it a hard hit to, not to get into a caliber war but some calibers are a no go.

If it’s a used gun they have other issues to consider, like has Bubba had a dermal close to it, and frequently what kind of sights did he put on it.

This is a very open ended question.
 
New or used, must be un-bubba'd. Factory sights. I prefer to make my own pick if new sights are needed.
 
Plastic and aluminum. Real guns are made out of steel and wood. Plastic is for toys. Aluminum is for aircraft and beer cans.

ARs are awarded my only exemption.
 
Depends on what it will be used for.

Defense, I want stupid simple manual of arms, good grip and at least a decent trigger.

Range toys are pretty flexible so long as least they have a pleasing grip and trigger.
 
hand fit at the top of the grip. I have a weird shaped hand, I guess. I have thin fingers and wear a large glove, but i guess have a narrow channel at the webbing area of my thumb and pointer finger, so if the gun has a wide grip at the base of the slide like the Ruger RAP45, it feels like someone is taking a hammer to the thumb knuckle nearest the web of my hand. Its bad enough that it makes me flinch. Its not the grip thickness itself that causes it. I can shoot a thick ol' 92fs with no issue yet a think single stack Ruger EC9-S kinda pops me a bit. The SIG 320 melts into my hand, but my FN509 shot well but still rubbed/smacked my knuckle. Conversely, I can shoot my Shield .45 until I'm broke. It's more comfortable than a full size 1911 for some reason. I can "fix" the problem with a chubby-butt pistol by "fixing" my grip, but it's not a natural grip for me. Kinda doesn't make sense to carry a gun that requires you to adjust your hold on it.

At the LGS, I generally will rock the gun back in my hands. If i feel the frame press against my knuckle pretty hard before the barrel reaches what I would consider the likely rise during firing, I put it back until I can find one to shoot. Thin guns and especially guns with good tapering to the beavertail area are a much better fit. I really wanted to like the RAP, but it was just too painful to shoot.

This with a bit of qualification. I no longer have my trigger (index) finger on my right hand. It was permanently damaged in an accident and later removed about a decade ago. SO, grip and control manipulation, and reliability are of utmost importance to me. I generally do not have or want handguns with a safety, the exception being a couple of 1911's. I bought a used Smith and Wesson .40 pistol about 5 years ago that I wanted so badly to work, but I just could not get in tune with it. I can't remember the model, but it was a larger, metal one. And of course, if I spend the money on this, then that has to wait...
 
Is that strong hand only, or when bringing your support hand to the gun?
The support hand runs the new mag in. I must have short thumbs. Here's two pictures, one with a Glock 19 and the other with a Sig 250. See how my thumb easily engages the slide release on the sig but just bare touches the slide release on the Glock.
DSCN0735.JPG
DSCN0736.JPG
DSCN0734.JPG
DSCN0733.JPG
 
Reliability is sure enough number one for me too, but I took it that FISwampRat is asking about a gun that I am trying to make up my mind whether or not to buy - not one that I've already bought, took home, and found out was an autojammer.
That said, when I see a gun that I like the looks of in a gun store, and it feels good in my hand, and I like the trigger and the sights, I try to resist buying it until I've read some reviews in some gun magazines and on the internet. If I see the slightest hint that the gun is not reliable (and gun writers can be very good at hiding unreliability hints) I don't buy the gun.
Anyway, that's the way I try to do it nowadays. I've made mistakes though. I've bought guns that were jamming pieces of junk, and lost money when I sold them. I'm working on it - I try to not be overcome by temptation as easily as I used to be overcome by it.;)
I should have been more specific. Let's say gun is well reviewed, rock steady reliable, manufacturer you like, price good, etc.

Was wondering about things like two tone (slide silver, frame black or some such unmatching between the two), cerakote finish vs standard black, what previous modifications, if any, would be non-objectionable, and, as mentioined, trigger feel etc.
I was presuming a reputedly reliable gun that you'd perhaps read about but never handled, what thing, once in your hand, was the dealbreaker.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top