How long does load development take you?

Status
Not open for further replies.

ANATION

Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2010
Messages
161
Location
Pennsylvania
Just curious. I have two Model 70 Coyote lights, 22-250 and 6.5 Creedmoor. The 22-250 was sub MOA with almost every 55gr or below bullet I have loaded for it with 40gr VMAX over 3031 being the most consistently accurate at a .58 MOA average for over a dozen groups and multiple groundhogs. Took under 100 rounds to find this bullet/powder combo. My 6.5 Creedmoor, at around 100 rounds, is only spitting about 1.2 with all my loads combined. I do shot MOA with it but it’s not consistent. These two guns are not my only reference point. Over the dozen or so rifles I’ve loaded for the past ten years I always could find consistent groups in under 100 rounds, or at least acceptable for my purpose. Perhaps I’m expecting too much from the gun.
 
10 shot ladder at 300.
5 shot groups at 5, 10, 15, and 20 thousandths off the lands.
I then shoot one 5 shot group .2 gr under my chosen charge. One at my chosen charge, and one .2 over.
I then drag out my chronograph and shoot over it so I don't pick a bad load because of chasing velocity.
If I can't reach the lands, I pick a seating depth and find a load within about 20 rounds.
 
I use OCW, so typically 3 x 7 loads (plus 3 sighters) at 100yds, then 5 confirmation rounds of the optimal load in triplicate (plus 3 sighters) at 300yds, and tweaking seating depth if needed is another 10 to 20 rounds. So 55 to 65 rounds...sounds about right.
 
Sometimes it is almost instantaneous, with other stuff, it’s never ending.

.58 MOA at 3 yards would be more than sufficient for some stuff but wouldn’t even put you in the top 10 at further distances for other uses.

My development generally ends when I am satisfied with the results weighed against the intended use.
 
Last edited:
Just curious. I have two Model 70 Coyote lights, 22-250 and 6.5 Creedmoor. The 22-250 was sub MOA with almost every 55gr or below bullet I have loaded for it with 40gr VMAX over 3031 being the most consistently accurate at a .58 MOA average for over a dozen groups and multiple groundhogs. Took under 100 rounds to find this bullet/powder combo. My 6.5 Creedmoor, at around 100 rounds, is only spitting about 1.2 with all my loads combined. I do shot MOA with it but it’s not consistent. These two guns are not my only reference point. Over the dozen or so rifles I’ve loaded for the past ten years I always could find consistent groups in under 100 rounds, or at least acceptable for my purpose. Perhaps I’m expecting too much from the gun.
I read the other day a post from a fella , said that as soon as he had things figured out he found a barrel that proved him wrong.
Hope that’s not too cryptic....
 
Some guns/calibers are easy to find loads for. Others not so. I've narrowed down a load in as little as 50 round, then loaded some proof loads to confirm. I've also had some that I ended up using 5 different powders and bullets before I found something it liked. You just never know till you start.
 
For my PRS match rifle last season, I finished load development in 30 rounds. It could have been 10, as all shots followed the trend - Triplicate of an 10 round Satterlee test.

My development generally ends when I am satisfied with the results weighed against the intended use.

This.
 
I have one right now that seems to shoot anything pretty good. Every time you increase the powder by .2 the velocity goes up, there are no defined flat spots. I ran through a range of 2.5 grains and everything was pushing through a 1 inch hole.

So now I'm going to load up and run an OCW test on it and see if I can see something that stands out. I know about where I should be velocity wise based on my old barrel and the tests I have done have shown me about where that is so I have a range to play in.

Barrel may still be speeding up and I switched to new brass for the velocity tests but I have a match in 2 weeks that I need to be ready for.
 
how does your creed load stack up to premium factory ammo (such as federal gold medal match)?

it may be the rifle, or the loose scope, or ….

luck,

murf
 
Haven't tried factory yet. I would like to try the Federal Berger OTM. I love the gun and I've found a good whitetail load with 143 ELD X. (1.08 groups should kill any whitetails considering the distances I shoot) I wanted more from the Sierra 130gr TMK. I am going to try the incremental OCW approach.
 
Most of my load development involves researching what others are using. Every single load that I use is one "borrowed" from others. If you find that X grains of Y powder and a brand Z bullet in 308 is working for a lot of people chances are it will work for me too.
 
I have one right now that seems to shoot anything pretty good. Every time you increase the powder by .2 the velocity goes up, there are no defined flat spots. I ran through a range of 2.5 grains and everything was pushing through a 1 inch hole.


So now I'm going to load up and run an OCW test on it and see if I can see something that stands out. I know about where I should be velocity wise based on my old barrel and the tests I have done have shown me about where that is so I have a range to play in.

Barrel may still be speeding up and I switched to new brass for the velocity tests but I have a match in 2 weeks that I need to be ready for.
Here’s a thought for you, [ when the seating depth is “on” lots of powder charges look good, on the other hand if your seating is off no charge will improve it]
J
 
Sometimes it is almost instantaneous, with other stuff, it’s never ending.

.58 MOA at 3 yards would be more than sufficient for some stuff but wouldn’t even put you in the top 10 at further distances for other uses.

My development generally ends when I am satisfied with the results weighed against the intended use.

+1
 
I use a modified OCW also:

20 rds initial powder charge testing
15rds for seating depth
May or may not check different primers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top