As I think I may have mentioned already, I’ve got two Glocks—a 43X for CC, and a Gen 4 20 for bear-country hiking/camping—and a bit of fun at the range! I’ve also got the Colt Gold Cup NM that I think everyone should have, a Beretta or two, a Browning Buckmark Target .22, a couple Rugers, and an old S&W K-frame .38. (The last is a VERY sweet shooter, btw.) I like the Glocks for what they are—simple, reliable, parts always available, and some ready resale value should I wish to do so (as I recently did)—and did I mention simple and reliable? I swapped the sights on both of my Glocks for my personal preference in such matters, and kinda liked that I wasn’t removing expensive (but unwanted) sights.
I see no reason to heap disapprobation atop someone else’s choice of firearm. If it’s a make/model with which I’m completely unfamiliar, well, that means, obviously, that I don’t really know anything about it. Thus, any opinion I offer is probably worse than useless.
I have a friend that says I should have to turn in my “man card” because I’ve got a couple Glocks that I actually like/carry. He favors CZ and Walther. Which are fine choices. My dad doesn’t much care for Glocks and never will. (He’s far too old to be changing his mind on such matters now!) He’s a forever-and-ever revolver guy. Bottom line, AFAIAC: if the gun does well the job for which it was selected, and the user likes it—I’m done. Maybe I’d never make the same choice in a million years. But that’s the beauty of it all—I don’t have to.