Varminterror
Member
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2016
- Messages
- 14,888
Light bullets, spinning super fast, running into tiny rodents... always a good time!!
Where can I find the dogs in NM? I moved to Alamogordo a bit over a year ago. I used to hunt the Dakotas when I lived in Minnesota.I started with a Ruger #1 in 22-250. I have never had any of the accuracy problems associated with the #1. It does one half or less minute of angle at 100 yard with 40 and 45 gr. bullets and a tiny bit larger with 50 gr. bullets in my handloads. I still have it but shoot it very little anymore. A scarcity of prariedogs is the reason. I also built another 22-250 on a (blush) Axis action for a coyote rifle. It does very well with my 55 and 60 gr. handloads running in the half to slightly larger minute-of angle groups at 100 yards. Despite building a completely new stock and installing a Rifle Basix trigger and it's good accuracy I can't love it a whole lot.
I finally got into the .223 game in the early 2000's with a G2 Contender with a 23" bull barrel. This little rifle is super accurate with my 40 gr. handloads but it suffers from the same prairiedog problem. Not long after S&W came out with the M&P AR I got into the AR OR game for a coyote rifle. I've modded it with a low profile gas block, free float hand guard, and LaRue two stage trigger. It's no Contender in the accuracy department but I can do three fourths to one minute accuracy at 100 yards with 55 and 60 gr. bullets in my handloads. Both the the 22-250 and 223 coyote getters are suffering for action due to smart coyotes and a geezer that can't hike long distances anymore to find dumber coyotes.
Where can I find the dogs in NM? I moved to Alamogordo a bit over a year ago. I used to hunt the Dakotas when I lived in Minnesota.
The only difference in ammunition cost is an additional 20 grains of powder in the 22-250 if you reload. About 8 cents a round.I voted .223 mainly because it's what I use and because the barrels will last alot longer compared to .22-250. Ammo is also significantly cheaper so I can afford to shoot alot more. That being said though, if money were no object (including cost of ammo and replacement barrels) the .22-250 would probably be my choice for the flat trajectory and oomph compared to the .223.
The only difference in ammunition cost is an additional 20 grains of powder in the 22-250 if you reload. About 8 cents a round.
Thats very very kewl. I agree that working the bolt while maintaining the firing grip is a much better way to do a bolt gun IF you are firing off of a rest of any sort. Not breaking the shoulder contact is one less variable to practical accuracy. Besides it feels correct. Beautiful work !This switch-barrel varmint rig offers almost the best of two worlds. 26" SS barrels for both .20 Ruger and .22/250 Rem were made and fitted by Shilen to a Stolle left-bolt, left port, right ejection benchrest action. The laminated hardwood stock was made By Fred Winig and is right hand configuration because I shoot right handed but prefer left hand bolt operation for my varmint rifles. There two bolts to accommodate the different case sizes. The close threaded barrels fit the square faced receiver so nearly "dead-nutz" that pre-determined minor scope settings return POI between barrel swaps. A couple more barrels are in the works for .17 Rem and .224 CHeetah..View attachment 888502 View attachment 888503 View attachment 888504
That is kewl. I have a right bolt left port bench gun, never thought about doing left bolt left port.Thats very very kewl
Old school, .222 Mag.
View attachment 887762
Don't forget the all time King of varmint calibers: the .220 Swift. Like this Pre-64 M-70 Swift with custom stock by Al Bieson..View attachment 887857 View attachment 887859 View attachment 887861
My vote will always be for 220 Swift, and it was left it out! For shame!!