dickydalton
Member
Well, I finally caved in and have one on the way. View media item 2873
You're going to have a blast..
Pun intended
AFS
Yep, the dies, bullets and brass came yesterday.I hope you reload. Definitely a fun cartridge and the ability to download with the other 32 cal relatives has really been a boon for me introducing new shooters. Looking back I wish I would have gotten a single seven instead of a 4" SP101 but it really is splitting hairs as to the pros and cons. My only complaint is shooting full power loads indoors with a head cold is painful due to blast but otherwise it has been a dream to shoot.
So far I only have 85 & 100 grain XTPs with some 110 grain LBTs coming from Montana Bullet Co.So, what loads are you looking at so far?
Has this been announced? I'm starting to doubt it will happen.Probably would have been better if you waited for the 3 inch LCRx in .327.
It's inevitable it will because all they need is to make the barrel sleeves in .32 caliber an inch longer. That's extremely easy for Ruger to do, easier than when they came out with the steel frame for the 3 inch LCR for .357 Mag.Has this been announced? I'm starting to doubt it will happen.
My single 7 has no issues with the 100s and does well enough I'm looking to the 120s. Just saying...... Why don't you like the heavier stuff?Probably would have been better if you waited for the 3 inch LCRx in .327. I have the 4", it's just... okay. I did find a handload that is accurate for it and uses the cheapest .32 bullet available, so I'm happy for now. When I got mine, had the 3" LCRx been available, I would have gotten that instead and used 85 grain projectiles. The 100 grain or heavier .327 ammo is probably best in rifles.
Mine is from back then also. Notice the adjustable rear sight?View attachment 895307
View attachment 895308
I prefer the heavier stuff in my SP101 .327. The 85gr bullets aren't accurate at full load. They are too short to stabilize in flight at that speed with the rifling twist of the barrel.
I shoot 100 to 120 grain in mine for full load and 90 grain soft lead for reduced loads.
The 90 grain bullets I shoot at 25yds and they are a lot of fun.
Mine is a 3" from back when Ruger first came out with them.
This was pre-MIM construction and is all stainless. Not that it really matters.
I didn't say I didn't, I just think for a light revolver that 85 grain .327 is better. For the Single Seven or GP100 or Blackhawk, sure, 100 up to 125 grains is fine. Rifles, absolutely, heaviest is best for a revolver magnum rifle.My single 7 has no issues with the 100s and does well enough I'm looking to the 120s. Just saying...... Why don't you like the heavier stuff?
Based on 85 jhp full speed vs cottontail, I'd like a 32 h&r speed 100 out of the lcr. I don't have an lcr yet, but based of the lack of penetration and over expansion, not sure I'd love it stopping a tweaked two legger..... though the energy of impact should stagger nicely I suppose.I didn't say I didn't, I just think for a light revolver that 85 grain .327 is better. For the Single Seven or GP100 or Blackhawk, sure, 100 up to 125 grains is fine. Rifles, absolutely, heaviest is best for a revolver magnum rifle.
I chose 85 grain because full house 100 grain .327 is... stout and that's in an SP101. Put that in an LCR and not only and I deaf and blind, buy my hand and wrist need an ice pack for 15 minutes.Based on 85 jhp full speed vs cottontail, I'd like a 32 h&r speed 100 out of the lcr. I don't have an lcr yet, but based of the lack of penetration and over expansion, not sure I'd love it stopping a tweaked two legger..... though the energy of impact should stagger nicely I suppose.