Ruger gp100 in .22lr

Status
Not open for further replies.

General Geoff

Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2006
Messages
5,671
Location
Allentown, Pennsylvania
anyone have one of these? Opinions on handling and accuracy for target shooting out to 25 or maybe 50 yards? Any mounting options for a compact red dot or holo sight? Looking to supplant or replace my Smith 63 which is just a bit too small in my hands and its been having constant fit/lockup issues.

How is the GP100's triple lockup? Any tendency to bend extractor rods like a Smith? Thanks for any feedback :)
 
I was going to buy one.

My friend at the LGS had a used one. The trigger was fantastic. I told my friend I'd come get it from him in a month, when he'd be willing to dicker on the price more. He smiled and told me he didn't think it would last that long.

He was right. :(
 
I don't have the .22LR model, but only because I haven't seen one in the store. I do have a couple of other GP100s in .357Mag. I've never heard of anyone having trouble bending extractor rods. If you did manage to bend one, it wouldn't be a huge deal because they aren't used as part of the lockup as is common in other brands.

The lockup is good on them. The only issue I've had is that they have a lot of rough edges, particularly inside. They can really benefit from some cleanup work.
 
I have an early model GP that required a lot of rework to get it usable, but now it is really smooth and works great, the massive frame makes it stable for long targets. If you are used to S&W's you will notice the DA trigger pull on the GP is longer than a S&W, not a problem unless you do speed shooting sports. As far a the extractor rod, I have never seen a problem with S&W's or the GP, the GP rod is shorter than a S&W. I made my own dot mount because I didn't care for the ones available for the GP platform, my mount also uses the rear sight cross pin to provide a stable mount. My GP had only one tapped hole (the rear sight screw) for a mount. Newer S&W's K frames have 3 tapped holes for a mount. If you find a GP look it over good, my friend also has one and he also did a bunch of rework on it, hopefully they go through quality control by now.

Yb1MmIz.jpg
sfL7iHL.jpg
 
Thanks, I ordered one and it should be in next week. I'll be sure to check timing and lockup before paying.

DS-10-SPEED, what kind of work did yours need?

As I mentioned, both mine and my friends GP's were early models, but that should be no excuse for poor quality. Some of the problems were with poor machining cleanup and some just bad machining. Since we both were capable of repairing them and were going to fine tune them anyhow for competition use we didn't bother sending them back to Ruger. The sad thing is the first GP I looked at another gun store had machining flaws I couldn't fix.

Since you asked, here goes:

The right side of the trigger guard was not finished, still had rat tail file marks, I refinished it.
The hammer was poorly shaped and rubbed the frame real bad, I reshaped, polished and added shims.
The star ratchet was poorly machined on 4 of 10 causing rough DA pull on those 4, I filed and polished it.
The cylinder extractor star had metal curls, I made a tool to clean up.
The gun would not fire reliably with some brands, modified the firing pin to look like my S&W pin.
The front sight dovetail was not machined deep enough, caused rear sight to be at upper limit, not repaired.

RebEFLU.jpg
zoA9RJ7.jpg
txgdxT5.jpg
HnETUgV.jpg
6V4jW1W.jpg
TI60j2O.jpg

The design is very strong and should be reliable, I just find it hard to believe that they would release products this poor in quality knowing that the first ones will be the first ones reviewed.

I'm happy how mine shoots now, very smooth, it's great for target and hunting, but it stays home for speed shooting sports because I'm used to the shorter, faster DA trigger pull of my 617's.

Look yours over, good luck.
 
Last edited:
Some very minor chafing on the side of the hammer but otherwise, it looks great on the outside. Casting surfaces are mostly rough on the inside, as expected. I already took it apart and polished all the important sliding surfaces, got the single action trigger to break like glass at about 3 lbs. Double action is still a little herky-jerky, probably having to do with the extractor star machining. Still a lot better than the Smith 63 it's replacing. Lockup is great, B/C gap is measured at 0.004 inches.
 
As I get more used to the gun, it becomes more and more evident how accurate it is. With Federal Champion ammo:

gp100 group.jpg

1-3/8" group, shooting with elbows on the bench. Most of my groups for the day were between 2 and 3", all ten rounds. Worst was right at 3" spread at the 20 yard line.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top