Status
Not open for further replies.
Well from what I've researched and seen people tend to love the Taurus weapons. Can you ilaberate on just what makes them "junk guns" because I've personally found d it to be more of a hassle using auto-loaders more than any revolver out there and I seriously doubt that Taurus could somehow mess one up. But if you prove me wrong and provide some convincing evidence then I wi definitely take your advice into consideration.

The rifling turns a shotshell pattern donut shaped, w/ a hole in the middle of the pattern. The massive jump through the cylinder to the forcing cone cuts down on your velocity, both for .45 Colt, and even more noticeably w/ .45 Automatic.
 
And you place far too much trust in Taurus' competency.
Honestly I place my trust in the testing of others and any evidence I can procure myself. Now from what testing I've seen they appear to have fixed the "donut issue" but in all honestly when you have a hand held shotgun load your gonna want to use that at the closest range possible which makes the "donut issue" a moot point in my opinion. However not getting the full use of your gunpowder from the bullet this gun was designed to use is a problem. I'll look more into the Taurus company but honestly I'm still not going to take it off the table until I can see for myself just what other issues it may have.
 
Man that's a sweet gun. I had to look up the toklat as I've never seen it before.
That things ridiculous, love it. I call that my "fishing gun" because that's what I told my wife I needed it for- self defense while fishing. It kind of evolved into. "If I don't hook a fish I can shoot at them with it".
Mine has digested 3,000-3,500 full power / near full power 454s so far and a few hundred 45 colt loads - nothing has broken or worn out and locks up the same as when it was new. yeah, I've carried it outside of the woods , it's a little excessive for pretty much everything in the Midwest - town or trail.
 
I have owned about a dozen Taurus revolvers.

One had problems.

The rest were reliable. Something like four of them had stiff triggers, about four were okay, and about four were excellent.

Taurus has made their 357 Model 66 and derivatives for a long time and all three of mine have been reliable with good to excellent triggers. The Old Model 66 I have has an internal safety like a S&W instead of a transfer bar. It has a trigger as good as all but my very best S&W revolvers.

My S&W 625 is my favorite 45acp revolver. You can use moon clips with it, but you don't have to.

I like my Blackhawk 45 "convertible" a lot, and shoot 45acp out of it much more often than 45 colt.

There are still police turn-in S&W Model 10's out there for about $300. That's roughly what I paid for my 2" LE turn-in. Its trigger and accuracy are outstanding. Most of the LE turn-in handguns I've purchased were carried a lot and rarely fired.





 
Well I've now got two pistols to consider and just need to find them at affordable prices. Wish me luck because this will be my last post for some time now. Have to go help out the family with some stuff.
 
What pray tell is this firearm? It looks reminiscent of a colt python.
The Ruger Toklat is about as different from a Colt Python as a gun can be and still be a conventional double-action revolver. :D
Now from what testing I've seen they appear to have fixed the "donut issue"...
The "donut issue" results from the bore being rifled and there is no fix for it. If the bore is rifled, the shot pattern will spread very rapidly and show a donut pattern on the target.
...but in all honestly when you have a hand held shotgun load your gonna want to use that at the closest range possible...
I don't think most handgun self-defense trainers/experts advocate getting as close to a deadly threat as possible.
 
The Ruger Toklat is about as different from a Colt Python as a gun can be and still be a conventional double-action revolver. :DThe "donut issue" results from the bore being rifled and there is no fix for it. If the bore is rifled, the shot pattern will spread very rapidly and show a donut pattern on the target.I don't think most handgun self-defense trainers/experts advocate getting as close to a deadly threat as possible.
I'm not an expert on firearms but even I could tell that the gun in the picture wasn't a colt python. It looks like one to me.

To be fare in the testing I saw of the revolver the tester was several meters away and was still able to have a reasonable pellet spread but it didn't look like a donut. Now i did read that they somewhat fixed that issue but that source could be wrong and so can i.

Yes most people myself included would run away but I'm thinking of worst case scenario here. I'd like to have as many advantageous ways of effectively hitting my target in a high stress situation as possible. A handheld shotgun built into a revolver platform is perfect for that.
 
The way to hit your target is through intensive training with a quality handgun and not a gimmick.
Yes I know training is everything when it comes to handguns. I am simply trying to ask other users of said firearm how their exsperances have gone with its use. Hell I carry a single action for SD and I'm damn good with it.
 
So far I've found a Raging Bull for 700 which is great because if I can sell my extra Single Action for the same price that i bought it for then I'll only need 30 more bucks! Now i just need to find a reasonably priced Ruger Redhawk.
 
Last edited:
am thinking that it would be a good idea to give one of my replicas back to the store or sell it for full price to anyone willing to buy it. (It has never even been fired and hasn't had any kind of work done to it so it's in brand new condition.)

unless this is a really rare collectible the odds of you getting full price are laughable... like a car... drive it off the lot n you do loose money and more importantly you should expect too...
 
General rule - expect no more than 60% even in the best of condition from a dealer. A private sale may give you more.
 
I want to try a charter. The surface finish looks a bit off putting but I understand making a gun to a price point - that often excludes fine detail. But I've heard great things about them.
 
You are responsible for every round fired. 90% is not good enough.
I should have said 98% or 99%. Out of the 32 shots I placed down range when I was last there only 2 missed and those were mm above the shoulders. Either way I can definitely agree that nothing less than 100% accuracy will do.
 
You are responsible for every round fired. 90% is not good enough.

Even top level competition shooters miss on occasion, especially in practical/combat style courses. 100% perfection is not a reasonable standard to expect from any human in a high-stress situation.

This is why one of the four rules is to be aware of your target and what is beyond it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top