Combat Magnum 69

Status
Not open for further replies.

JulietTango

Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2008
Messages
53
Location
Kentucky
I just purchased a model 10064 from RKGuns. Ive read that the pictures some times aren’t really accurate. Do these come with grip material similar to what is used on the 637 or 642? I handled one with a 4.2 inch barrel once but it had after market grips.
 
"I've read that the pictures sometimes aren’t really accurate."

The picture shown on Bud's Gun Shop site does show an incorrect picture of the 100064/Mod 69. It shows a much shorter ejector rod shroud than the on my 69. Also the grip shown on Bud's site is different from my originals. The grips are typical S&W rubber.

Whatever, I really like the 69 even though I've only fired a tew rounds out of it so far. The addition of the third cylinder lock makes it just a tad stiffer to open and close but that's not a negative. I have several S&Ws from different eras and the trigger on he 69 is as good as any and better than most...especially in double action, very smooth.

M 69_01 stamp.JPG M 69_02 stamp.JPG
 
The picture shown on Bud's Gun Shop site does show an incorrect picture of the 100064/Mod 69. It shows a much shorter ejector rod shroud than the on my 69. Also the grip shown on Bud's site is different from my originals. The grips are typical S&W rubber.

Whatever, I really like the 69 even though I've only fired a tew rounds out of it so far. The addition of the third cylinder lock makes it just a tad stiffer to open and close but that's not a negative. I have several S&Ws from different eras and the trigger on he 69 is as good as any and better than most...especially in double action, very smooth.

thanks for the response. I’m really looking forward to getting to know this shorty. My only other.44 magnum is a Redhawk 5.5
 
I usually replace the factory S&W rubber grips with Hogues these days, if I go with rubber.

The grips S&W seems to be using these days, seem to cover the backstrap, and do two things that are negative for me. One, pushing the back of the grip away from the trigger, makes the placement of my trigger finger wrong. And two, the grips come together in a sort of dull, knife-edge, that concentrates the recoil in the palm of my hand, and I find it annoying, and even painful, if Im shooting a lot, especially with the heavier calibers.

The Houge Mono and Bantam grips fit my hand better, put my trigger finger where its used to being, and leave the backstrap exposed, and makes for a wider surface, which helps spread the recoil, instead of concentrating it.
 
The Houge Mono and Bantam grips fit my hand better, put my trigger finger where its used to being, and leave the backstrap exposed, and makes for a wider surface, which helps spread the recoil, instead of concentrating it.

thanks for the reply. You prefer the exposed back strap. When I first started shooting my redhawk I thought about covering it but after spending time with it I think making that area wider would be better. I still have the stock wood grips it came with.
 
Before you do anything, Id give the factory grips a try. You never know, they might turn out to be just what you want.

I dont have a 69 (still looking for a snubby), but I do have a 3" 696 (44 special L frame). The Bantams are what I have on it.

enhance.jpg

The Mono grip actually makes it a nicer shooter, if youre planning on shooting it a lot, but also makes it a tad bigger.

I shoot revolvers DAO, and that little bit of offset you get with the grips covering the backstrap, makes a noticeable difference in how the gun feels in the hand, and how the trigger feels leverage wise.

It may also be all in my head, and Im sure if I worked at it, I wouldnt notice in short order, as I got used to it, but all my other S&W's have the same exposed backstrap, and they all feel the same in my hand, .22's - 44mags.

The focusing of recoil into that raised edge on the other hand, is something else, and I dont see how that will go away without a change in how the grips are shaped across the back.
 
I've got the 4.25" bbl'd. model...like it a lot...and find the supplied grips pretty good for recoil mitigation. But...the gun weigh's ~38 oz., unloaded, (within an ounce of my M19 Smith) and that's very light for current production, full-house .44 Magnum rounds. I've shot the magnums, but padnuh, they're not fun.

The supplied grips are good in my hands, but nothing, IMHO, is going to make full-house Magnums comfortable. I generally carry mine for woods walks & farm chores with 240 gr LSWC's at 950 fps..Skelton's old load. That's a good, working load that's comfortable for extended shooting sessions...more on a .44 Special level. We keep horses on the farm, have also kept cattle, and found that load sufficient when one of them needed to be put down.

That Mono grip has worked well for me on a Smith M60 3" bbl'd .357 with full-house 160 gr LSWC loads. I hadn't thought of them on the .44 but they're cheap enough I just might give them a try on my M69.

YMMv, Rod
 
Last edited:
Ive used both the Bantam and Mono grips on my 696. The Bantams are the way to go if you want to carry the gun, but aren't quite as comfortable when shooting hotter loads.

The Mono grip makes the gun a bit bigger, but is the more comfortable grip to shoot with, especially with the heavier loads.

One advantage to both is, they are both fairly cheap, and readily available, so it wont kill the wallet to try both. I have a box with a number of "spares" that Ive acquired over the years, so they dont usually go to waste, and when I see them, it just reminds me they need a gun to go on. :D

eBay is a good source for them, often at cheaper prices too.
 
I’m a big fan of the M69. Have several of each barrel length (in case S&W decides to discontinue). Bought a 4 ¼” when they first came out in in early 2014. Been shooting the 2.75” pretty much exclusively for the last couple of years. For the moment, it’s my “perfect packin’” pistol. I just drop one in the hip pocket of my Carharts when I walk the dog here in Montana.

I’m in my mid 70s and don’t find the recoil objectionable until you get into “boutique” 300gr + ammo. I get to the range maybe three times a week on average. At least two of those days is dedicated to shooting the 2.75 incher with 20.5gr 2400 and 240gr JSP (or equivalent). I only shoot 30 or 40 rnds per outing because I tire quickly and am lazy when it comes to reloading ammo. I shoot both single action and double action.

My guns are equipped with the Hogue X Frame 500 rubber grips (I’ve worn out five or six sets). My X Frame grips are both stock and modified (rounded butt and removed finger grooves). I have shot the guns with the factory provided grips but find the X Frame grips more comfortable. I can’t do wood grips as they pound the bone at the base of my thumb. What grip works for me, may or may not work for you.

The nice thing about the .44 Mag is that you can use ammo that suits your needs – from soft shooting .44 special equiv to 300gr plus – it’s your choice.

Left - Stock Hogue X Frame on 4 ¼” M69. Center - Modified Hogue X Frame on 2 ¾” M69. Right – Kahr CW45.

M69s%20CW45%20a%20IMG_1096.jpg


Paul
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top