Best bullet for 5.56 self defense?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I live in an suburb and am surrounded by houses built with plastic cladding and drywall.

To try and keep my problems from becoming my neighbors problems my rifle is loaded with 50gr V-max varmint bullets. Those start falling apart when they hit anything and produce shallow, explosive wounds.

BSW

MK 262 fragments on hitting the target, but still usually has 1 or more fragments that penetrate more deeply than varmint rounds.

Here is an article on the subject of defensive 5.56mm/.223 ammo. 75 and 77 OTM rounds are the first choice if barrier penetration is NOT desired AND you have at least a 1 in 9" twist.

I will say that most .223 or 5.56mm loads should work fine, with the exception of varmint loads (unless possibly out of a very short AR "pistol" or SBR), or M855 out of short barrels.

John
 

Attachments

  • Terminal_Ballistic_Performance.pdf
    973.5 KB · Views: 19
I strongly disagree with that. 55 grain blitz kings have accounted for 6 deer per season by my nieces for the last 7 years. Not one of them got away.

You can disagree all you want, but if you called Sierra about their Blitz Kings or Hornady about their VMax bullets and would they be a good choice for deer size game or duty use I am 100% sure they would direct you to a bullet designed to penetrate a lot deeper.

Glad you are not losing deer with these rounds, and people have lost game with proper bullets for whatever reason, but the fact is that these bullets are NOT proper for this type of purpose.

They are designed to explosively fragment on impact and not penetrate...this is the opposite of the design for a SD or large game hunting round.
 
You can disagree all you want, but if you called Sierra about their Blitz Kings or Hornady about their VMax bullets and would they be a good choice for deer size game or duty use I am 100% sure they would direct you to a bullet designed to penetrate a lot deeper.

Glad you are not losing deer with these rounds, and people have lost game with proper bullets for whatever reason, but the fact is that these bullets are NOT proper for this type of purpose.

They are designed to explosively fragment on impact and not penetrate...this is the opposite of the design for a SD or large game hunting round.
That's why this is a forum. I have my opinion based off my experience. You have yours.
However, I recommended 55 grain soft points in my original post. Because they give a better margin for error.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HB
MK 262 fragments on hitting the target, but still usually has 1 or more fragments that penetrate more deeply than varmint rounds.

Here is an article on the subject of defensive 5.56mm/.223 ammo. 75 and 77 OTM rounds are the first choice if barrier penetration is NOT desired AND you have at least a 1 in 9" twist.

I will say that most .223 or 5.56mm loads should work fine, with the exception of varmint loads (unless possibly out of a very short AR "pistol" or SBR), or M855 out of short barrels.

John

I didn’t see info about thin jacketed, light weight varmint bullets in the .pdf you linked. Was that in one of the links in the .pdf?

BSW
 
I thought that way too, until the Minneapolis Riots. Fortunately, my hunting round is exactly what you describe. The AR is also kept nearby with my .45 ACP and 12 ga.

I have no qualms using my AR, don't get me wrong. I live in a town of 700 more than an hour away from any "city" above 20,000, so riots aren't QUITE as big of a concern for me. That being said, my AR sits right next to the Mossberg in the safe so its just as available, haha.

I have no qualms using my V-Max in the meantime, just like the idea of soft points a little more after watching some ballistic gel tests.
 
Last edited:
There is no "Best" home defense round. There are many that work well and each have their pros and cons. Do you want better barrier penetration, fragmentation, a mushrooming bonded bullet, etc..? Do some research and decide which attributes fit your wants and needs.

In the end it's still a rifle round. Even the "bad" choices are still pretty darn effective.

That being said, I would avoid using FMJ ammo. It's too inconsistent. It will usually fragment at CQB ranges but you'll still get some rounds that don't upset and just punch right through.
 
This will continue without end. A new brand comes out and suddenly IT becomes the “most destructive ammunition”, capable of traumatic tissue damage while penetrating at least 12” of ballistic gel. Of course this is all verified by DIY Interwebs, Ballistic Wound Engineers.

My thoughts are that being hit by ANY 223 round is not going to be an especially pleasant experience. In fact, I believe it would be just about the worst day of the individuals life. That said, given a choice....I would prefer using one of my reloads with any bullet ABOVE 60gr, in the Ballistic Tip/Hollow Point variety.
 
I’m not worried about lack of penetration with lightweight varmint bullets because I’ve shot coyotes and feral dogs using them. If a persons arm is absorbing the bullet and preventing it from entering the torso they aren’t going to be using that arm for anything.

The local police use AR-15 patrol rifles. Their general experience is that one shot stops the action, with the shootee usually not surviving.

I’d generalize and say that torso hits with anything other than FMJ are going to stop a fight. FMJs would ‘usually’ stop a fight with one hit but not as reliably as expanding bullets.

BSW
 
I'm going to say that using a lightweight varmint bullets is about like using shotgun birdshot for home defense. Any gun is better than none, but if one is going to take the time and thought to make a deliberate choice for home defense, I would like something that can expect to penetrate more than 6 in. There's a whole lot of difference between a 40-lb 'yote and an aggressor.

if you want to test it out, just get some milk jugs and fill them full of water. If you can't penetrate over three milk jugs full of water, your round doesn't have enough penetration for SD. OTOH, if you penetrate more than 5, that's too much.
 
I'm going to say that using a lightweight varmint bullets is about like using shotgun birdshot for home defense. Any gun is better than none, but if one is going to take the time and thought to make a deliberate choice for home defense, I would like something that can expect to penetrate more than 6 in. There's a whole lot of difference between a 40-lb 'yote and an aggressor.

if you want to test it out, just get some milk jugs and fill them full of water. If you can't penetrate over three milk jugs full of water, your round doesn't have enough penetration for SD. OTOH, if you penetrate more than 5, that's too much.

In my experience the lightweight varmint loads remove a considerable amount of flesh from animals.

The biggest difference between pistols or shotguns vs rifles like .223 isn’t total energy, it’s velocity. The higher velocity bullets that actually transfer energy to an animal cause ripping and tearing or flesh away from the actual crush track of the bullet. Not a lot will survive that affect.

BSW
 
but what 55g bullets are better than M193?

What works well on deer will work well against human threats

Absolutely agree.

The simple answer is to select 223 ammo with these features or names:

Nosler Partition, Barnes Copper , Federal Trophy Copper, anything bonded( Federal Fusion / Speer Gold Dot / Remington Bonded / Nosler BSB), even simple JSP.


Below are the LE websites for Hornady, Remington, and Speer. They have great information, even if some only sell to LEOs. Consider Hornady's LE ammo offerings. Training means cheap bullets - FMJ or SP. Precision means a match bullet. Urban means a V-max. Barrier means a bonded bullet. Patrol is a GMX (their version of a tipped copper bullet.)

The best part is that every one made for duty use has a gel test so you can choose for yourself:
https://www.hornadyle.com/rifle-ammunition/#!/

Ok, this site is a little wanting for info, but it is something:
https://www.remingtondefense.com/ammunition/rifle/

Speer doesn't have many offerings, but all the gel test info is there:
https://le.vistaoutdoor.com/ammunition/speer/rifle/default.aspx

Here's a 55gr SP for a gel test comparison:


The information on the ammo marketed to LEO's gives a great idea about the desired characteristics of defensive 223/556 ammo. Again, even if we may not be able to buy the box that they specifically market to LEO's in some cases, consumers can typically buy the same kinds of ammo in a box marketed for 223 deer hunting.
 
I'm going to say that using a lightweight varmint bullets is about like using shotgun birdshot for home defense.

Wait..what? Did you compare a high velocity rifle round to birdshot? There are several loads of 223 using a 40gr Ballistic Tip bullet with muzzle velocities at or greater than 3800FPS. If that were to hit a human body, the tissue damage would be horrifying. Unless of course you were comparing to a 12g bird shot wound at POINT BLANK condition?? If that’s what you meant...than sure..I agree, LOL!
 
I'm going to say that using a lightweight varmint bullets is about like using shotgun birdshot for home defense.
Except birdshot even at contact distance does not introduce hydrostatic shock. All a V-max or similar bullet has to do is punch through a rib or the sternum at SD distances, and instant jelly. They do it on deer at 200 yards, don't know why they wouldn't do it on a human at 10 yards, even with the thicker bones.
I understand the attempted analogy, but it isn't quite that bad.

Thanks for posting that link BigBL87, I just ordered some also!
 
Wait..what? Did you compare a high velocity rifle round to birdshot? There are several loads of 223 using a 40gr Ballistic Tip bullet with muzzle velocities at or greater than 3800FPS. If that were to hit a human body, the tissue damage would be horrifying. Unless of course you were comparing to a 12g bird shot wound at POINT BLANK condition?? If that’s what you meant...than sure..I agree, LOL!
#7 1/2 birdshot at 10 feet penetrates just under 6", and creates a very wide wound...almost exactly like T223D (40 gr), though of course the .223 isn't as velocity/range sensitive. LOL!
 
Last edited:
Except birdshot even at contact distance does not introduce hydrostatic shock. All a V-max or similar bullet has to do is punch through a rib or the sternum at SD distances, and instant jelly. They do it on deer at 200 yards, don't know why they wouldn't do it on a human at 10 yards, even with the thicker bones.
I understand the attempted analogy, but it isn't quite that bad.

Thanks for posting that link BigBL87, I just ordered some also!
The V-Max, and most lightly constructed high speed loads, would be more effective at 200 yards on larger game/targets than at HD ranges, due to velocity loss causing less fragmentation and deeper penetration.
 
I typically just load my AR with M193 55g FMJ, but was wondering if I want to switch to a different bullet that might be more effective. I think I want to stay with a 55g bullet if possible, at M193 velocity, so point of impact would be hopefully about the same.

Looks like most ammo sources are pretty dry right now, but what 55g bullets are better than M193?
Doesn't this depend on what SD scenario you need the AR for? Noise upstairs in middle of night, live in an apartment or pretty 'soft' house? Or live in the country and see a bunch of yahoos in a pickup truck bent on breaking down your gate and stealing your (whatever)???

More effective dong what?
 
Doesn't this depend on what SD scenario you need the AR for? Noise upstairs in middle of night, live in an apartment or pretty 'soft' house? Or live in the country and see a bunch of yahoos in a pickup truck bent on breaking down your gate and stealing your (whatever)???

More effective dong what?
Mk 262 is more effective at almost everything, except barrier penetration. A bit of research, and perhaps a moderate bit of testing, should allow any reasonably intelligent member to cover all bases with 2 rounds.

I probably have at least 6 different kinds of .223 & 5.56, but MK 262 "+1" (M855, etc) would be fine with me.

John
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top