.45 Colt and 2400 - help a brother out

Status
Not open for further replies.

Tallinar

Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2010
Messages
951
Location
Eastern IA
Hey guys,

So I'm working up a deer load with .45 Colt, and elected to use 2400, as it's the most suitable of the two powders I have on hand.

The gun I am loading for is a single shot H&R Classic Carbine with a 20" barrel. I perceive that this gun is strong enough that I should be able to push up into "Ruger Only" loads without any concern. I'm not trying to load anything insanely hot; but I am looking to push past the SAAMI spec for a good, consistent, hot load for this rifle.

I'm working with 250 gr Hornady XTPs, Winchester LP's, and brand new Starline brass.

I've done enough research to learn that 2400 does not perform well if loaded on the anemic side. It sounds like you really have to push it to its pressure "sweet spot" in order to get consistent, clean burns.

So I started at 17.0 grains. This is .5 grains less than the Lyman #49 published max load of 17.5 grains with the same bullet and OAL (1.590"). Results were very disappointing. There was an enormous amount of unburnt powder granules in the bore after each shot, with a lot of residual smoke. I have used powders like Unique and 700X and am familiar with "smokey" dirty-burning powders, but to see this much unburnt granules of powder was concerning. I did not do a rigorous accuracy test, and was not shooting from a solid rest that day, but initial impressions seemed mediocre.

So I made some more test loads. I loaded a handful of 18.0 grains, 19.0 grains, and 19.5 grains. Judging by consensus of forum posts I have read across the web, as well as the old John Linebaugh article, it sounds like 20-20.5 grains is as high as you'd ever want to go with this bullet weight and powder, so I figured I would see how these performed and decide if I even wanted to bother pushing to 20 grains.

Testing these rounds today, the results were fairly quite similar as the 17.0 grains. Without any empirical measurement, I would report that the 18.0 grain loads burned just as inconsistently as the 17.0 grain ones. The 19.0 and 19.5 grain loads seemed to leave noticeably less unburnt granules, but it's still quite a bit. I boresnaked the barrel between test strings to try to get the best feel I could for unburnt powder.

None of these loads showed any sign of high pressure. All the primers looked good. No issue with extraction. Felt recoil was pleasant, and I would comment anecdotally that the 19.0 and 19.5 grain loads did feel to have snappier recoil than the others. But I still just can't get over how incomplete the powder burn seems to be.

My question is simple. What am I doing wrong? Using a 20" rifle like this, I feel like I am giving this powder every possible chance to perform well. I don't have the cylinder gap or short barrel of a revolver to contend with.

Is it possible that I am not crimping hard enough? Or could my chamber be too loose or something? Should I carefully push up to 20 and 20.5 grains and see what happens?

I've uploaded a picture of my loaded rounds. Maybe you guys can tell me if I need a heavier crimp. I'm using RCBS seater with a simple roll crimp. OAL is 1.591". I could probably have seated the bullet a tad bit deeper. Also, I think I belled the case mouths slightly too much, as I had a tiny bit of brass shaving when I crimped (probably visible in picture).

Any suggestions, short of just giving up on 2400 with this cartridge?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0523.jpg
    IMG_0523.jpg
    85.1 KB · Views: 41
According to Hornady, you haven't even reached the suggested start load yet.

Edit: The .452" 250gr XTP was designed to expand at SAAMI pressure 45Colt pistol velocities. At the speeds you'll be pushing them from Ruger only levels from a 20" barrel, expect extreme expansion and poor penetration on deer. I would highly advise going with the 240gr or 300gr XTP mag at such high velocities.

c5b638.png
 
Last edited:
It's weird, I have the Lyman 50th...but their loads for 45 Colt with a 250g projectile are...well, weird. They don't list and CUP for pretty much any of their loads and they all see really light. They show a max of 16.5g of 2400 with a FPS of 904. Like MrA said above, Hornady doesn't even start their chart until your at 1200 fps.

All I can say is this; I gave up loading 44 special with 2400 for the very same reason. Lackluster performance and very messy. Now...in hot 44 mag loads? 2400 is one of my favorite powders.

*EDIT*
You know...I never kept flipping pages in the book. I'll be honest, I didn't even know there was an T/C and Encore section in the back.
 
It looks like testing 20-21gr may be in my future.

Does my crimp and seating depth seem to be acceptable, at a glance?
 
I will also add that 2400 was way down the list as far as accuracy goes out of my Marlin 1894 45Colt 20" cowboy model.

13gr of HS-6 produces one ragged hole accuracy with a 250gr XTP using starline brass and CCI 350 primers.

13gr Blue Dot was right on the heels of HS-6.

The 13.0gr HS-6 load produces ~1320fps out of the 20" tube which is more than adequate for deer. This load plain turns the lights off for deer.

Shoot for accuracy, not velocity. I'll take a slower hit than a fast miss every day of the week.
 
IMO 2400 is a poor choice for the 45 Colt. You said you have 2 powders on hand but didn't tell us what the second powder is.

The other one is Red Dot. I have been using it for lighter target loads (250gr RNFP over 6.0gr), and really like it. Burns super clean in my rifles and 7.5” Blackhawk, and good accuracy. But I don’t think I can push the velocity up very high on that without quickly reaching very high pressure.

If I could simply find some Unique right now, I’d probably just stick with that and call it good. I’ve used a lot of that in the past and been happy with it.

I’m thinking I carefully try as high as 21 grains of 2400, and if I still can’t get a burn I’m happy with, it’ll go back in the cabinet for awhile.
 
I’v been using H110 for several years now.Its becomes my pet load very accurate fast and repeatable.Ruger only!
 
Why are you took my for such a heavy 45 Colt load? What will be the application?

I guess at this point it may be OCD.

I set out just to get a decent deer load for this coming season. And it probably doesn’t have to be perfectly clean burning... but now my OCD demands I work toward a clean burning load so I can be satisfied. :)
 
I have to admit, after I finally got a 45C albeit in a Ruger Redhawk, I found the two most accurate powders were HS6 and AA5. With 250-280gr bullets I have no problems with either one

There are a lot of powders in that area that also can do well if you can't find them.
 
From much reading on the subject my opinion is that the H&R is not equal to the #1 Ruger in strength. Check the H&R section in Castboolits for more information. I had one in 45-70 and was informed that it might be a little better than a Trapdoor.
That said, my 45 Colt favorite load is the RCBS 45-255KT and 18 grains of 2400 in a Ruger Blackhawk. Will shoot through a decent whitetail. Or, it has two times
 
The H&R is slightly weaker than than a Ruger #1. I was working up loads in a SB2 Handi Rifle chambered for 45-70. Called H&R and the factory tech said that a steady diet of hot loads would stretch things and cause it to open on firing. I stated this here in another thread and another member called me out and basicly said I was stupid for beliving that. Well I have an SB2 in 30-06 that has that problem from running hot loads by the previous owner so I tend to listen to the factory guy and do not use max loads in my H&R 45-70. He said max pressures for a 45-70 Guide Gun would be OK to shoot frequently without damaging it. More 2400 or another suitable powder and work up an accurate load is good but a diet of hottest rifle loads I would avoid. My 2C.
 
Last edited:
A lot depends on which frame one has. I had the NEF H&R Buffalo Hunter and I believe it was a SB1. Definitely not a strong gun. Not sure what the 45 Colts were built on.
 
I am aware that the H&R SB2 is weaker than the Ruger #1, but that's a different topic more relevant for 45-70 and high power rifle chamberings. When talking about .45 Colt, "Ruger only" isn't referring to the Ruger #1, but rather the Blackhawk/Redhawk, in contrast to Colt SAA's or similar clones. The SB2 Handi Rifle in this chambering should easily be at least as strong as a TC, if not significantly more.
 
Thought I would post an update to this.

I did manage to get to the range and test some 20.0 and 20.5 grain loads with 2400. To my dissatisfaction, they seemed to burn just as dirty as the 19.0 grain loads. Accuracy seems like it would be acceptable, though I didn’t get to shoot further than about 17 yards (limited to an indoor range right now). Though I didn’t have a chronograph, I get the impression from perceived recoil and from comparing POI with my light target loads (same bullet weight) that these little dudes are moving nice and fast.

Neither the 20.0 or 20.5 grain loads showed any hint of high pressure in my rifle. The spent cases look identical to the other, lighter test loads from before (down to 17.5 grains), and all extracted smoothly. No concerns about pressure spikes right now.

In conclusion, I think the 20 grain loads give me a nice, round number, and they seem like they’d be plenty accurate enough to shoot minute of paper plate at 100 yards, with plenty of power to crush Bambi’s lungs. I plan to load up a few more of these and try to get some better range time in to really get a feel for grouping.

In the meantime though, I managed to find a couple pounds of Unique for sale online, which arrived last week. So honestly, I think I am going to shelve the 2400 for now and go back to old faithful. If it ain’t broke... :)

Thanks again.
 
I use 20.8gr H110 and the sierra 300gr sjsp bullets and i shoot these in my rossi R92 leveraction 45 colt rifle 16in barrel these run clean and super accurate! ;)
 
Thanks for the update. I actually have a H&R .45 Colt coming my way soon, so I'm curious to see how things shake out. I won't be shooting jacketed bullets in mine, cast only, but I want some velocity to get them out there.

My experience with 2400 has been a little iffy. Many years ago I tried a can in .41MAG and .45Colt (16" Trapper) and the results were mediocre at best... so I burnt it up and never looked back. When I got into long-range single-shots, 2400 was suggested as a low-velocity powder for the .45-70... so I bought 2 pounds. Further testing in both the .45-70 and, again, with the .41MAG showed I wasn't really missing anything the past 25 years since I abandoned 2400. I'll burn my 2# up... and swear off it, again.

My go-to powders for the .45 Colt are, of course, Unique... which works really well in the 16" Trapper, as well as my 20" Marlin 1894 .41MAG... for mid-range stuff... but what works REALLY well is IMR4227, which has become my primary 'pistol cartridge in rifle barrel' powder. I don't like it in pistols so much... it's about as junky as your experience with 2400, but it excels in rifle-length barrels with heavy bullets.
 
Thanks for the update. I actually have a H&R .45 Colt coming my way soon, so I'm curious to see how things shake out. I won't be shooting jacketed bullets in mine, cast only, but I want some velocity to get them out there.

My experience with 2400 has been a little iffy. Many years ago I tried a can in .41MAG and .45Colt (16" Trapper) and the results were mediocre at best... so I burnt it up and never looked back. When I got into long-range single-shots, 2400 was suggested as a low-velocity powder for the .45-70... so I bought 2 pounds. Further testing in both the .45-70 and, again, with the .41MAG showed I wasn't really missing anything the past 25 years since I abandoned 2400. I'll burn my 2# up... and swear off it, again.

My go-to powders for the .45 Colt are, of course, Unique... which works really well in the 16" Trapper, as well as my 20" Marlin 1894 .41MAG... for mid-range stuff... but what works REALLY well is IMR4227, which has become my primary 'pistol cartridge in rifle barrel' powder. I don't like it in pistols so much... it's about as junky as your experience with 2400, but it excels in rifle-length barrels with heavy bullets.
i also load my cast bullets out of an old lyman single cavity part# 454 190 and i size these with a lee sizer to .457 and i lube these before and after sizing with lee alox! then i load these after they dry on wax paper with 6.8grs of greendot powder and these shoot super accurate out of this rossi r92 16in barrel. very nice shooting load with plenty of power!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top