UncleEd
Member
It seems to me that a lot of buyers shun
revolvers that aren't magnum, particularly
speaking of S&W's K frames.
This is good as then .38 Specials only are
usually a bit to quite a bit cheaper than
the "magnums." Good for me at least.
I learned a long time ago I don't like the
noise, recoil of a magnum K-frame
Smith. Oh, I've fired my share but still
don't think I'm as proficient with them as
I care to be.
Truth is, most people who insist on getting
a .357 for defense will rarely if ever shoot
the magnums.
I know that the .357 has a reputation as a
manstopper but I still rely on the .38 Special
specially designed defense loads.
Even in the heydays of revolvers when federal
agents carried .357s, their duty ammo was usually
not magnums but "hot" .38s. Same for most police.
So, if in the market for a K-frame revolver, save
yourself some money and get just a .38. And
with the money saved, buy more ammo to
practice.
revolvers that aren't magnum, particularly
speaking of S&W's K frames.
This is good as then .38 Specials only are
usually a bit to quite a bit cheaper than
the "magnums." Good for me at least.
I learned a long time ago I don't like the
noise, recoil of a magnum K-frame
Smith. Oh, I've fired my share but still
don't think I'm as proficient with them as
I care to be.
Truth is, most people who insist on getting
a .357 for defense will rarely if ever shoot
the magnums.
I know that the .357 has a reputation as a
manstopper but I still rely on the .38 Special
specially designed defense loads.
Even in the heydays of revolvers when federal
agents carried .357s, their duty ammo was usually
not magnums but "hot" .38s. Same for most police.
So, if in the market for a K-frame revolver, save
yourself some money and get just a .38. And
with the money saved, buy more ammo to
practice.