daniel craig
Member
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2009
- Messages
- 2,815
Save the money you’d spend in the pistol and use it but more ammo for a caliber you already have when it becomes available.
Dang funnyJust sold a CVA black powder .45 cal derringer cap and ball. I suppose something is better than nothing. If they miss it will make a good club.
Anybody had trouble getting .30 Carbine lately? Im well stocked on .223 and 7.62x39 but Ive been shooting the Carbines a bit more lately and saving the "front line" cartridges just in case.
Which means that while the common calibers will keep trickling out, the less common calibers, once they are sold out, will remain out of stock for the duration of the shortage.The shortage has gone on for so long that the conventional wisdom was overturned completely. Only the freshly made ammunition is being sold, and the ammunition makers mostly stopped loading oddball cartridges while they're struggling to supply 9mm.
We've been spoiled by 9mm, expecting it to be about $10 or cheaper a box of 50, both online and in decent LGS's. Right now that's impossible to find.This is exactly why I have bought cheap but perfectly serviceable LE trade-in and military surplus handguns whenever there's been a really excellent deal.
I paid $200-$300 for Beretta 81, Glock 22, Russian Makarov, Chinese Tokarev, etc. when they were widely available and cheap.
If there is any ammo for sale at all, I probably have something that will shoot it.
Something to think about before the next shortage.
The argument people have made as to why they won't go below 9mm is the price to power ratio. 9mm being cheaper, yet more effective than .380, 9x18 Makk, and .32 ACP is what drove people away from the smaller calibers. Improvement in bullet designs has turned the .380 and 9x18 into acceptable calibers for self defense, Hornady Critical Defense has been tested in both, and while the .32 hasn't changed, it's still better than .22 or .25 and near equal in recoil to those calibers.Regarding my mention of affordable 9x18 and .32 acp, - no, they don't have the sexy ballistics of 9x19 and larger. I do think that gets overrated at times; it's not like a .45 acp = Phaser set to disintegrate. You may have to shoot more than once, regardless of caliber, from a handgun.
In the smaller (below 9x19) rounds, I've seen a lot of info suggesting FMJ is preferred, for better penetration. So the less-expensive rds are fine for that.
For the shooting platform, both the Beretta 81 (.32 acp) and the CZ 82 (9 Mak) are reasonably small, well-made, accurate and reliable pistols. You're looking at 12 rd mags for both. I know it's been said for other handguns before, but it's worth repeating: if you need more than 12 rds of .32 acp, you need a rifle or shotgun, not a larger caliber handgun.
And that's fine, when we're talking about readily available $0.17 FMJ and approx $0.40 premium defensive ammo (the price I paid for Gold Dot 124 gr JHP).The argument people have made as to why they won't go below 9mm is the price to power ratio. 9mm being cheaper, yet more effective than .380, 9x18 Makk, and .32 ACP is what drove people away from the smaller calibers. Improvement in bullet designs has turned the .380 and 9x18 into acceptable calibers for self defense, Hornady Critical Defense has been tested in both, and while the .32 hasn't changed, it's still better than .22 or .25 and near equal in recoil to those calibers.
The bottom line is some gun beats no gun, it's not like the the lesser calibers are incapable. I think people have taken to justifying the use of 9mm solely on the cost of ammo and that anything lesser in caliber "wasn't good enough" yet anything larger "didn't do anything more" that made it worth owning, let alone spending a few bucks more on ammo.
The local Cabela's had a good deal of 25 ACP and 357 Sig. However, I would prefer to have a decent supply of my primaries stocked before the next crisis:
1. Meteors
2. Martians
3. Zombies
4. Godzilla
GEM, you missed the Yellowstone Caldera eruption, which is going to wipe out most of North America. Might happen sometime in the next 50,000 years or so. Better stock up now.
This would get you in the game, with 9x18 (Makarov):
That's a cosmetically challenged CZ 82 from J&G Sales for $249 (comes with 12 rd mag, can get additional for another $30). And a 1k case of Wolf 9x18 for $289.
- https://www.jgsales.com/cz-82-czech...-82,-good-condition,-c-r,-used.-p-102911.html
- https://www.academy.com/shop/pdp/wo...fire-handgun-ammunition#repChildCatid=3100817
This might be the cheapest way to go from totally unarmed, to having a centerfire handgun and reasonable supply of range ammo, in 2 wks.
Those factors are pre COVID. Right now, cost for ammo throws previous logic out of the window. Prior to all of this, most reloaders commented that it wasn't worth reloading 9mm. Just go and try to find 9mm reloading dies.... Or 380 dies for that matter.The argument people have made as to why they won't go below 9mm is the price to power ratio. 9mm being cheaper, yet more effective than .380, 9x18 Makk, and .32 ACP is what drove people away from the smaller calibers. Improvement in bullet designs has turned the .380 and 9x18 into acceptable calibers for self defense, Hornady Critical Defense has been tested in both, and while the .32 hasn't changed, it's still better than .22 or .25 and near equal in recoil to those calibers.
The bottom line is some gun beats no gun, it's not like the the lesser calibers are incapable. I think people have taken to justifying the use of 9mm solely on the cost of ammo and that anything lesser in caliber "wasn't good enough" yet anything larger "didn't do anything more" that made it worth owning, let alone spending a few bucks more on ammo.