John Ross 500 Smith and Wesson magnum review

Status
Not open for further replies.

KY DAN

Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2019
Messages
855
As many have probably seen in a previous post, I had a slight issue with John and getting this revolver and I by lack of oversight failed to provide a conclusion for previous events. I did finally get my revolver and furthermore I would like to emphasis there was no ugliness involved from John nor myself. In my case I simply did not ask about major life events that were going on at the time and for John he was just very difficult to get in contact with for a few weeks. As I told John I was willing to split the blame, I am 28 and am learning everyday this year (2020) life is not always clear cut black and white and more importantly its only by the grace of God anything goes right the first time. Since receiving my revolver I have had phone and text conversations with John concerning loading the 500 and various other points and I consider his willingness to share his experiences a blessing to those who wish to pursue similar interest.

Now onto the review of said AMAZING revolver!

I once read a 1957 Gun digest article by Col. Charles Askins reviewing the then newly introduced 44 magnum cartridge , in the article the author who was famous for purposeful acts of provocation provided the following statement.

"This Magnum is a man's gun. It ain't for boys. Word reaches me that some joes, probably with lace on their panties, are putting on gloves to shoot it. I hear that after a few shots your hand feels like you had been swinging at some fast balls with a cracked bat. How soft can we get? I shot the big 44 all one afternoon and found the recoil nothing more than stimulating. The kick kind of reminds me of the existing situation down in Dixie where a certain clientele now buy their white lightnin' over the liquor counter in preference to the smoother and legitimate bourbon. Asked why, they explain it's for the kick. Me, I'm the same way about this big 44 blasting Magnum."

This quote entered my mind as I ejected the first cylinder of brass onto the table at my local range. For as soon as I touched the first round of 500 magnum ammunition off I knew there was no turning back for me, I was hooked. This model of 500 features unique attributes which sadly Smith and Wesson has not seemed to adopt permanently into their X frame product line. For instance upon handling the sluggish factory 8 ish inch full length barrel shrouded revolver at my local rural king I found the weight and balance to be disgustingly awkward and no doubt that would affect the performance I could personally obtain using the revolver. So it was with great hesitancy I ordered the 5 inch from John not knowing what to expect nor anyone who had ever handled the revolver before. Upon receiving the revolver at my FFL I inspected and just could not get over how the revolver felt in my hands. Upon inspection all the unnecessary weight on the factory model was now gone, there was now a traditional styled barrel shroud which could be comparable to any N frame style revolver as well as the fact barrel lacked the poorly designed compensator which everyone speaks so highly of, and best of all located at the end of this barrel is a high visibility orange sight which has not seemed to affect sight picture in any light condition.

I have shot this revolver utilizing iron sights from the closet distance of 25 yards to the furthest being 200 yards and have done so with great success. Below is what would have been an fantastic 5 shot group had I not anticipated the last shot, with that said it was my second cylinder ever shooting the mighty 500.
20200906_125043.jpg

At 100 yards a 350 grain speer deep core bullet propelled by 42 grains of H110 proceded to twist a 6 inch AR500 gong (I don't think it was AR500 lol)

Over all I know this review is probably 10ish years late but I was too poor in college to buy this and no one would get it for me as a Christmas present. I would have loved this fine shooting iron ten years ago as much as I do today and simply can't imagine how many rounds it would have consumed in that same time frame. I paid $1950 for this specimen and do not regret the purchase and look forward to the many years of service it will provide both on the range and in the field pursuing large game.
 
. . . the author who was famous for purposeful acts of provocation. . .
That's the best description of Askins I've seen lately.

And:
index.php
 
I confess I have one of John’s special configuration .500’s. It is among the 3 that I own. I got it to trek in Alaska, but so far, my only trip has been a cruise on the inner passage.

The first one is a PC M500 Magnum Hunter SS with a 6 ½” barrel. I got a scope for it and shot it to 50 yds. where it demonstrated it is very accurate. It also pushed straight back in my shooting hand on firing, which I did not really like, but the built-in comp is tubular and the right size to be covered with tubing to eliminate the effectiveness of the comp. Now it rotates in my hand, which I much prefer.

The second one is the 4” version. I got it before the John Ross version, which I would have preferred, became available. My 4” gun needed a little work to work for me, like a higher rear sight blade. It came with its own removable comp, which I did not particularly like. I found someone who was making blank replacements and got one. I like it much better.

My last one is the JRS version, which is the version I would pack if I were traveling in an area where something very large and nasty could be found. I got it in 2007 and shot it a bit. I like it, and shoot it, but I am now getting old and am more averse to recoil, so I usually shoot milder loads and wear a bicycling glove. The bicycling glove has just a bit of padding which takes the sting out of shooting it.
4481.JPG
By the way, both the std 4” version and the 5” JRS both weigh 56 oz. on my scale.
 
There is definitely some truth to the sayings “There’s no such thing as bad publicity” and “There’s a sucker born every minute” because I find myself quite intrigued by these JR500s all of the sudden even with the oodles of pages I have read on the acquisition of them.
 
I don't know what the problems were; I got mine early. They are lot of fun to play with, if you can avoid doing permanent damage. And there are only 5 chambers to clean instead of 6, 8 or 10.
 
I bought mine used a few years ago. Though it was barely used. Got all the papers, soft case, box, and some ammo. I wasn't looking for a big bore at the time. Nor was I even looking for a pistol. But it fell in my lap at a price I couldn't pass up.

I haven't shot it enough yet, but really enjoy it. The first cylinder is the worst. You can expect all the recoil you want, but its not the same as feeling it. Its powerful. Very powerful. And i own a 22-250 pistol. Doesn't hold a candle to the 500. But its that power that keeps ya coming back to it. The JRC rotates perfectly in the hand under recoil.

The trigger is very crisp and very light. Light enough to accidentally discharge if you aren't paying close enough attention to your single action cocking method.

Next to a Colt Python

index.php


2 rounds was enough for my pops

index.php


It even dwarfs the 44 mag Virginia Dragoon

index.php
 
There is definitely some truth to the sayings “There’s no such thing as bad publicity” and “There’s a sucker born every minute” because I find myself quite intrigued by these JR500s all of the sudden even with the oodles of pages I have read on the acquisition of them.
Same here. I got a lil taste of big bore action a couple months back and these threads arent helping. I know what signs to look for, reading old posts, researching the net on anything JR500, watching videos. Yeah, I'm doing all that. Not good.
 
With only 500 made, they will always be tougher to find. But they are a fantastic pistol. Regardless of what one thinks of JR, his design and S&Ws execution are exceptional. The danged thing just performs flawlessly. It balances perfectly in the hand and doesn't necessarily feel like the club that it is when held out. And it is more accurate than i am.

I'd prefer to participate in threads about the JR500s that don't just bash his business practices. They mean absolutely nothing to the pistol itself. Since the remaining stock is being sold as a lot, access may be significantly easier in the future. And lets be honest, these guns were made in 2007-2008. They have been out for a long time and he still has a significant amount of stock. I don't know if its the lack of desire for them or just all the internet mumbo jumbo that people don't read with a grain of salt. Let us all remember that there are three sides to every story: mine, yours, and the truth.

They are, after all, the most powerful repeating hand gun in the world... That super narrow cylinder gap is a pretty good trick for squeezing every bit of power from the cartridge. I think mine is .003". Thats one piece of printer paper.
 
If you've read this far, then go back and reread
what ClemY and Kleenbore wrote about the
damage done to the human body.

Bottom line: Dubious fun now and then years
of regret later on.
 
If you've read this far, then go back and reread
what ClemY and Kleenbore wrote about the
damage done to the human body.

Bottom line: Dubious fun now and then years
of regret later on.

Not if you limit the amount of shooting/abuse per session and hold it correctly. I shoot copious amounts of heavy recoiling revolver rounds and my injures usually stem from doing work around the house.
 
I don't know what the problems were; I got mine early. They are lot of fun to play with, if you can avoid doing permanent damage. And there are only 5 chambers to clean instead of 6, 8 or 10.
The underlined passage, in and of itself, would give me pause.
 
Not if you limit the amount of shooting/abuse per session and hold it correctly. I shoot copious amounts of heavy recoiling revolver rounds and my injures usually stem from doing work around the house.

Thats what my lace frilled velvet shooting glove is for!

In all reality, who cares if you use a glove. This isnt high school where we have to try and impress everyone. Ive considered one myself and im only 32.
 
I always wonder what the old gun writers would say if they were alive and tech savvy today as we are.

Oh the hurt feelings that would ensue, in all actuality the 500 mag is one of the most versatile cartridges available today. No other cartridge is available that can fill the need of a gun to pot a prairie chicken all the way elephant if need be simply by changing bullet weights.

The 500 can use lee real 50 cal muzzle loader projectiles loaded over reasonable charges of unique or trail boss and be a low impact round that can make for pleasant shooting sessions. Or you can load to it's full potential using rifle powder and 50p to 700 grain bullets and just grin and bear the abuse. Its really something for everyone, I will admit at this point 350 grain projectiles seem to work really well and provide that kick that only white lightning type liquor could lol.

It's an amazing gun whether you choose to wear a glove to shot it or not.

I personally do not wear a glove when I shoot it because I usually get my fill of recoil and the blast wave of ditching dynamite in less than 100 rounds. (Reloading still is a major investment for this round and my wallet only goes so far lol)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top