I do not understand why we do not see more interest 22TCM as a 5.7 replacementFun to shoot.
Lots of muzzle blast.
Expencive to feed, tricky to handload.
Just not worth the trouble IMHO.
The muzzle flash may be more of the choice of powder used rather than the caliber. The 5.7 is generally loaded for rifle length barrels rather than handguns. Since the 5.7 is very difficult to hand load, I find the 22TCM (shortened .223) more interesting.If you want to see muzzle flash shoot a .22 Jet.
Bob
The muzzle flash may be more of the choice of powder used rather than the caliber. The 5.7 is generally loaded for rifle length barrels rather than handguns. Since the 5.7 is very difficult to hand load, I find the 22TCM (shortened .223) more interesting.
Because the interest in the 5.7 is so incredibly limited in the first place.I do not understand why we do not see more interest 22TCM as a 5.7 replacement
.... I have never shot the Ruger but it really seems to have missed the mark in the specs that I have seen with it being 15% heavier than the FN Five Seven. BUT I have never even held the Ruger so the weight might feel pretty comparable when mounted on my hip. ......
I own the Ruger 57. I've never examined the FN (seemed too much $$$$ to be reasonable) but have seen comparison articles in gun magazines. Yes, the Ruger is a tad larger, but not much. The Ruger is certainly light and pointable, and has good sights and nice trigger. It's a very well designed gun. I'm not saying the FN is bad, but for my money, I'd ask WHY THE FN??? ?
As for weight on one's hip; I seriously doubt anyone would note the difference.
I do not understand why we do not see more interest 22TCM as a 5.7 replacement
Any of you guys ever shoot one of 5.7 pistols?? If so which one and what was your impression?