Light Or No Light On A Home Defense Pistol?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Being as my plan -- should I ever need to pick up one of my home defense firearms -- is to have a phone in one hand, my answer is an emphatic YES! I can access my WML with a fingertip, but I have only two hands. Nobody is gonna be in my home but me or the wife, we'll be together, and we have a plan ...
HD2.jpg
 
I have installed solar powered lights around the periphery of my property and a sodium streetlight that covers the back of the house, the driveways and the carports.
I am in the process of installing a small solar powered light set in the middle of the house for emergency lights that stay on all night,
I have small, separate solar power systems in each bedroom that are controlled by switches on each light.
I learned my lesson in South Central Los Angeles. Carrying a flashlight just makes you a better target.
I do have an internal laser in my bedside gun but I only turn it on if I can't see the sights.

Never point your gun at anything that you are not willing to destroy.
 
He's saying you're better off using a CCTV than riding to the sound of the guns

The question was light or no light on a handgun used around your home. I said no because my house is equipped with lights already, inside and out, as most homes are. I said no because I'd rather not have to point my gun at anything just to see what it is. People may be up anytime of the day or night. I've investigated many a "bump in the night", though none with just a small flashlight. All looked into with as much light as possible.

If I'm "riding to the sound of the guns", (whatever that means), it wouldn't be with a handgun and a tiny flashlight. If I should ever encounter an intruder in my home I'd much prefer to have the lights on, and my handgun with it's laser on too. (a Beretts 92fs on one side of the house and a HK USP on the other). No sneaking around trying to surprise an intruder for me; lights, noise and announcing "I'm armed and the cops are on the way".
 
I am another for pistol ≠ flashlight. My bedside combo using the Harries method is Glock 21 and a Malkoff M61 light, which replaced a 3-D cell Maglite.
 
The question was light or no light on a handgun used around your home. I said no because my house is equipped with lights already, inside and out, as most homes are.

Power goes out. True story bro.

If your home is set up so you can turn on your lights remotely that's probably not a bad idea but if you're stopping as you enter each room to turn them on that's BEGGING for an ambush.


I said no because I'd rather not have to point my gun at anything just to see what it is.

Most WML are bright enough that the spill will light up the entire room.

I've investigated many a "bump in the night", though none with just a small flashlight. All looked into with as much light as possible.

Of all the things that I have to do as a part of my job the thing that I hate the most is clearing buildings. I. HATE. IT. I ABSO-*******- LOUTELY. HATE. IT. Every time I have to do it I want to piss my pants. There is nothing worse then walking around a city building in the middle of the night checking doors and reaching for one that's supposed to be locked and it isn't. If I had any other option I wouldn't be investigating "Bumps in the night" in my home. I'd hole up in the bedroom and call out "I'm calling the cops GT* out of here!"


If I'm "riding to the sound of the guns", (whatever that means), it wouldn't be with a handgun and a tiny flashlight.



If I should ever encounter an intruder in my home I'd much prefer to have the lights on, and my handgun with it's laser on too. (a Beretts 92fs on one side of the house and a HK USP on the other). No sneaking around trying to surprise an intruder for me; lights, noise and announcing "I'm armed and the cops are on the way".

One of the biggest lessons I have learned from dealing with crackheads is generally they're not intimidated in the least by the fact that you're armed. I've said this before but I have lost count of how many times I've had some crackhead look at me and DARE me to shoot them.

I remember watching a documentary on HBO about people who have had to kill people. (I was a kid when I watched it. I barely remember it but I'm certain that it was anti-gun tripe) the thing that stood out in my mind the most was the homeowner that confronted an intruder in his living room in the middle of the night.

They actually showed the incident on home security video. According to the homeowner he encountered the guy in his living room investigating a "Bump in the night" while armed with a shotgun. The homeowner said as soon as the burglar saw the gun he bucked up and started advancing on the homeowner DARING him to shoot.

You had better be prepared for when the bad guy doesn't piss his pants and run screaming like a little girl into the night at the sight of your Mighty Boomstick.
 
Last edited:
FWIW, here's a pic of the tiny little WML/Laser mounted on my .45. It's small enough to use in a IWB holster with no problems. Most pistol WMLs are bigger and more powerful.

49862899091_e2bbf4405a_z.jpg


Here's how much light that tiny unit puts out. It will easily light up a scene well enough to ID a target without pointing directly at the target.

49866268346_28c28ed900_z.jpg


The WMLs on my shotgun and rifle are orders of magnitude more powerful and can certainly be used to ID targets while keeping the muzzle pointed off target.
 
I searched MANY structures, and built-up areas, in 33+ years of big-city police patrol. (This does not make me an expert.) Some thoughts:

For those who believe that anyone inside your residence can ONLY an intruder, well, during one foot chase, the criminal smashed THROUGH a glass exterior door, into an occupied residence, and duty compelled me to remain right behind him. The couple, inside the home, were QUITE surprised to see this happening. Fortunately, there was enough lighting for them to understand what was happening. I was too close, on his tail, for the criminal to try grabbing a hostage, and, cornered/trapped, he disappeared under a dog-pile of officers.

A hand-held light is vital. A spare hand-held light is a very desirable option. A WML is somewhere farther down the list.

In a dynamic encounter, where I cannot be sure whether or not the enemy might be behind me, which includes my flanks, tritium sights can be a liability. This is not theory; the fresh green glowing vials, in my rookie trainees’ sights, as I evaluated their building searches, were like Rudolph’s Red Nose, making it easy for me to track the trainees, without having to use my hand-held white light. (I would not want to back-light a fellow officer, for obvious tactical reasons.) Now, if one were to remove me from that equation, at that moment in time, and insert an armed felon, well, we see the liability that tritium sights present.

So, I believe that a WML is more important than tritium inserts in the weapon’s sights. Both are optional, and, if I am hunting bad guys, in a 360-degree-threat environment, I would rather that my weapon’s sights not glow. Again, if I am hunting bad guys, in a 360-degree-threat environment, I would rather that my weapon’s sights NOT glow.

More than anything else, tritium sights helped my aging eyes “game” quals, and one or two “tactical” shooting exercises, because I could align the glowing dots, rather than have to focus sharply on the outline of the sights. In real-life encounters, it was having a white light that mattered.

In most circumstances that justified pointing a firearm at a person, I could see him, and he could see me. A WML would not be “giving away” my position, at these times, but might well be what would enable me to see his hands well enough to know whether he presented a deadly threat. (In actual practice, during most of my career, I was not allowed to use WMLs on any duty or defensive firearms, on or off the clock. When more than a handful of officers, which included myself, started using WMLs, the command staff banned them, pending “study.” After years of “study,” WML protocols were developed, then studied by city legal, which took more time. Finally, training classes were developed, to certify officers to use WMLs. I never played golf with right folks, or learned the secret handshake, or whatever, so finished my career with my firearms “slick;” no WMLs, lasers, or optics.)

WML on my home-defense firearm? Short version: Yes, of course. (Longer version may follow. Or, not, as others may well have covered it thoroughly.)
 
Yes.

But, you don’t necessarily want to turn it on. In a home defense situation, you should know the area. It’s very hard to see into dark spaces from light spaces. Go through your home at various times considering the lighting and what you can see and what you cant. Also modern lights are so powerful they can be disorienting when reflected off walls — something else to check for yourself.
 
Now weapon mounted light in this house. I keep multiple flashlight's. Two on nightstand. Both my side and wife's.
 
Yes. Both of my carry weapons have lights, a Streamlight TLR-7A on one and Viridian C5L on the other. My EDC hand flashlight sits on the nightstand at night as well as a backup light. My HD shotgun and rifle both have lights on them. Even my watch has a small light on it. Which is great for walking to the kitchen and not stepping on a 10 week old puppy. I have taken enough low light and night shooting classes to know how to use them effectively when rounds need to be exchanged.
 
As a firearms instructor for law enforcement, everyone in my dept is required to qualify in low light conditions with their handheld light and then again with their WML. The scores with the WML are significantly higher than those with a handheld light. Once they try them no one wants to give them up.
 
As a firearms instructor for law enforcement, everyone in my dept is required to qualify in low light conditions with their handheld light and then again with their WML. The scores with the WML are significantly higher than those with a handheld light. Once they try them no one wants to give them up.
That's a pretty telling comment.
 
Yes the subject is weapon mounted lights but I wonder why for their home residence that people don't have more secure enterpionts, windows and a master power switch for lighting????
 
I keep a small stand-alone flashlight by me when I'm asleep. At home, travelling, doesn't matter. I have yet to have anyone object to me keeping it handy anywhere. The same cannot be said of my firearms. If i hear a strange noise, i grab that light. I also use it to avoid tripping over furniture, and for aim assist when using the restroom, because missing the bowl may make my wife kill me in my sleep, too.

I also have a big Great Dane who would go absolutely apes*** if someone who didn't belong in my house found their way in.

In the case of that, or other sound of forced entry, i have a pistol with a small, 600 lumen QD weaponlight in arms reach at home.

I also have said for years that a pistol is just there to get you to a rifle. On that note, in my safe is my ranch rifle, a semiauto carbine with an 800 lumen light and an LPVO. If i suspect the issue is outside, i reckon i take the time to grab that.

Also have CCTV i can check for clues to what's going on, time permitting.

I have some luxuries, though. I live on a rural 10 acres with horse pastures surrounding the house. Nobody's likely to innocently find themselves in or around my house by happenstance, and anyone who WOULD have reason to be here at night knows better than to just show up unannounced.
 
IMHO, night sights are great for finding your pistol in the dark. :)
A WML is great for seeing your target and your sights. It even works with a red dot.

TG also says that your house should have enough light to identify a target when you wake up from sleeping, nightlights, lights on cable boxes, coffee makers, etc..

The WML goes on as the pistol comes up and you have time to not shoot if you are mistaken in your initial threat assessment.

I ran a test with a bunch of action pistol shooters at our club some years ago with more than a dozen participants.
Light in their eyes, most shot around the light source with most getting good hits. Not many complete misses.
Strobe light in their eyes, all got good hits on target. Most said the strobe made it easier as the time the light was off was less pain in their eyes.
The same flashlight was used in both tests.
Two ways to defeat a light shining at you, a more powerful light and a ball cap.
Brightest light wins and you tip the brim of the hat down to block the light like a sun visor in your car.
*this was a few years ago and lights have gotten much brighter so I can't say for sure all of that would remain the same.
**nobody shot the flashlight

Having run many low light stages at our club matches, there is no doubt that people shoot faster and better with a WML.
BTW, clean burning ammo is important. Put a cloud of powder smoke in front of your light and all you'll see is your light.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top