Long range rifle recommendations

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sweet-Tooth

Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2020
Messages
14
I'm looking for a rifle for long range shooting, but I'm not sure exactly what that will entail yet. This is something I'd like to get into, but I don't know if I'll be happy being able to take a deer at 500 yards or will want to try competing at 1000 yards at some point.
I live in FL, so don't need anything really special here for deer, but I would like a rifle I could use for elk or bigger game in Alaska at some point.
I was originally looking at the 338 Lapua, then I saw this: https://defensiveedge.net/canyon-rifle/ and this: https://defensiveedge.net/338-terminator/
I assume like many other things in life, you get what you pay for and as you move up the price scale there is a diminishing rate of return for your dollar. Of course, optics will be a major piece of the puzzle too. Would I be better off putting most of my money into a scope and then transferring it to a better rifle in the future?
I would be interested to hear your thoughts.

Thanks
 
I'm looking for a rifle for long range shooting, but I'm not sure exactly what that will entail yet. This is something I'd like to get into, but I don't know if I'll be happy being able to take a deer at 500 yards or will want to try competing at 1000 yards at some point.
I live in FL, so don't need anything really special here for deer, but I would like a rifle I could use for elk or bigger game in Alaska at some point.
I was originally looking at the 338 Lapua, then I saw this: https://defensiveedge.net/canyon-rifle/ and this: https://defensiveedge.net/338-terminator/
I assume like many other things in life, you get what you pay for and as you move up the price scale there is a diminishing rate of return for your dollar. Of course, optics will be a major piece of the puzzle too. Would I be better off putting most of my money into a scope and then transferring it to a better rifle in the future?
I would be interested to hear your thoughts.

Thanks

You have left out a lot of information, so it's hard to give you advice. I'm going to assume that you don't have a lot of experience with these kinds of rifles. There are many things to think about when you start getting into the larger 338s:

1) Do you reload?
2) Have ever done anything with wildcat cartridges?
3) Are you recoil sensitive?
4) Are you happy with short barrel life?
5) What's your budget?
6) Are you a good enough shot to realize the potential of a long range rifle?
7) What is long range?
8) Do you have a good laser range finder and a good chronograph?

Speaking for my self, the answers are Yes, Yes, No - until about ~20 rounds, No - but it's part of the game, Varies, Some days, Yes. I would add for each of these questions:

1) Reloading will save you some money. I can't imagine how expensive it would be to find pre loaded wildcat cartridges. Also I'm not a big fan of hunting with wildcats. I would prefer to be able to find ammo easily when I'm a long way from home. Are you already set up for reloading? If not, add that to the cost.

2) If you haven't done any wildcatting, the costs can go up considerably when you consider custom dies, extra time at the range and other tools you need to make your own rounds.

3) This depends a lot on you, the stock fit, and how much you shoot. Only you can answer this.

4) I won't speak for other rounds, but my .338-416 gets about 1000-1200 useful rounds out of a barrel before accuracy starts to fall off.

5) My .338-416 is about $2 a shot. That include brass (brass is ~$2.50 a piece and I get 4-5 shots out of each round), powder primer, bullet and about $0.50 in barrel wear every time I pull the trigger. So a 20 round range session is about $40 with reloads. It looks like commercial 338LM is about $3-$4 a round. Don't forget travel to shoot the rifle. I lived in North Florida and there were no ranges close to me to shoot long range.

6) I have seen a bunch of guys at the shooting range with "long range rifles" and they are shooting +2" groups at 100 yards. That's probably going to equate to +30" at 1000 yards. Many of them, just don't know how to shoot. The most common thing I see is anticipating recoil and lifting their heads. Second is lousy trigger pull. This one is really something you need to think about - if you are not an experienced shooter. I don't think it's impossible to learn to shoot with a big 338, but I don't think that it makes it easier. In my opinion, you should be getting < 0.5" groups at 100 yards. I like to sight in at 300 yards, and at that range, I want less than 1.5".

7) You mentioned 1000 yards. If that is all you want, I'd go with a 6.5 PRC, 300 Win Mag (or 300 PRC) or 338 LM depending on what caliber you really want. With something off the shelf, you can get shooting quicker and see if it's really what you want to do.

8) When you starting getting out in range (past what you can estimate for), a good laser range finder is critical. Guessing at ranges is a sure way to miss. What I call hobby chronographs (anything with two screens ~2 feet apart, or the MagnetoSpeed) typically only have about 1% accuracy. That's not enough to do long range. You need an Oehler or Labradar (accuracy can be 0.1%). You're trying to get your standard deviations down to a few feet per second. You can't measure that with a chronograph that's giving you velocities with +/-30 feet/second error.

There are tons of choices out there:

1) Look for a used rifle that hasn't been shot out. You can sometimes find good deals on long range rifles because people find out it's not what they really want.
2) You can buy something off the shelf and find out for yourself. If you do this, I would suggest you get something with a good action that can be used as the basis for a custom rifle later. Then you can rebarrel and restock as you learn more about what you like/need.
3) Go for a semi-custom - I haven't done this. It's certainly more costly than a off the shelf, and whether you really get your money's worth depends on you. Speaking for myself, if I were going to give someone ~$4K for a rifle, it would be exactly what I want and I would go to someone like Long Rifles Inc and have them build it. I would also use a chassis system. The group size of my .338-416 halved when I sent to an XLR chassis. It may be that the stock didn't fit me as well, or it could have been a bedding issue, but I find the chassis much easier to use and maintain.
4) Go full custom - the sky's the limit here. You can easily spend ~$5-$6K (not including optics) for rifle, gear and ammo when all is said and done. Keep in mind that it may take more than a year to get your rifle too.

I'm sure someone will come along and say all of this is wrong and for them, they may be right. It really comes down to what you want to do and that's hard to know.

I haven't touched on optics here. That's another can of worms. I use a Nightforce ATACR on my .338. I would suggest you spend some time looking through scopes before you invest the money. You're going to need good mounts too.

Brad
 
Last edited:
I have started reloading again this year and will definitely be going that route, but I don't think I want to go down the wildcat path.
I do have a chronograph, but it may not be accurate enough for this level.
I wouldn't say I'm recoil sensitive, but I'm not a fan of it either. How much will a muzzle brake help?
As for shooting ability, that could always stand improvement of course. I know the basics and can shoot MOA with pump action 30-06 and a little better with a pawn shop 300 Win mag I got for Christmas last year.
Not really sure how far I'm going to want to take this. 1000 yards may even be further than I feel I need to go, I don't know yet. I do know I want a rifle I can hunt with and not one so specialized that it's only good for the range.

Thanks,
Dean
 
What is the pawn shop 300WM? You may already have something that will at least let you find out if it is something you really want to do. A muzzle brake can substantially reduce recoil, at the expense of irritating others next to you at the range. Also, the 300 winmag has been around for quite awhile and there is endless reloading recipes and trajectory tables for it.

It would also work well for hunting most things in Alaska.

For target shooting, I believe a 6.5 creedmore or similar would allow more shooting and barrel life. Compromises are part of the game.
 
If you have a known distance range near you, you could skip the range finder, as they'll let you know what you're shooting at.

The 300 Windy would work great out to 1K, albeit with more recoil than necessary.

A simple 308win would get you there, a 6.5 Creedmoor would get you there a little easier and with less recoil.

A chrono would be handy, but with a 100yrd zero and a free ballistic calculator you can figure muzzle velocity from downrange results and a little fiddling.

Honestly, a $350 Ruger Predator in 243win, 6 or 6.5Creed and a $250 SWFA fixed 10x or higher scope, plus some range time is the bare bones of what you can get away with. Strelok (an app for your phone) and Shooterscalculator.com can be pretty handy, low-cost resources as well.

A laser range finder and a kestrel weather station would be nice to go with your Nightforce scope and Accuracy International rifle, but you don't need it to get started.

You're not gonna take home any trophies with that combo, but if you just want to bang some steel it's a starting place.
 
Last edited:
no would be handy, but with a 100yrd zero and a free ballistic calculator you can figure muzzle velocity from downrange results and a little fiddling.

That's a recipe for running in circles. You might as well buy a cheap chronograph, it would be better. Shooting to determine muzzle velocity is not really a good way to determine it. Also, you won't know how good your load is because you won't have any idea what standard deviation is.
 
That's a recipe for running in circles. You might as well buy a cheap chronograph, it would be better. Shooting to determine muzzle velocity is not really a good way to determine it. Also, you won't know how good your load is because you won't have any idea what standard deviation is.

It's not ideal, but it's better than nothing.
 
Target rifle vs hunting rifle is a pretty big distinction. In the latter I'd want something powerful if for taking game at long range, but also lightweight for carrying through the mountains. That's not really a fun combo you'll want to sit down and throw a bunch of rounds through from a bench. My longest range hunting rifle is a Mk V in 300 Weatherby but I honestly don't know that it does much my 30-06 doesn't out to pretty long range, and the '06 is a lot nicer rifle to carry.
 
Thanks for all of the replies! My 300 WM is a low end Remington 700 with a plastic stock. I'll probably restock it in walnut and epoxy bed it while I'm at it.
This would definitely be a hunting rifle I could target shoot with, not the other way around. I'm planning on sinking some money into it and want to get the best bang for my buck so to speak.
 
I'm looking for a rifle for long range shooting, but I'm not sure exactly what that will entail yet. This is something I'd like to get into, but I don't know if I'll be happy being able to take a deer at 500 yards or will want to try competing at 1000 yards at some point.
I live in FL, so don't need anything really special here for deer, but I would like a rifle I could use for elk or bigger game in Alaska at some point.
I was originally looking at the 338 Lapua, then I saw this: https://defensiveedge.net/canyon-rifle/ and this: https://defensiveedge.net/338-terminator/
I assume like many other things in life, you get what you pay for and as you move up the price scale there is a diminishing rate of return for your dollar. Of course, optics will be a major piece of the puzzle too. Would I be better off putting most of my money into a scope and then transferring it to a better rifle in the future?
I would be interested to hear your thoughts.

Thanks

Probably next Spring - Winchester more than not will be offering FN/Winchester M70 rifles chambered in their new long range .277" cartridge - the 6.8 WESTERN.

150-175 gr. Nosler ABLR or equivilant bullets, launched at 3100-2850fps respectively, from a 24"/1:8 twist Bbl'ed FN/Winchester M70 Extreme Weather/SS rifle...?

Will provide 1,500 ft-lbs or energy out to 675 yards - and be supersonic out to 1,300 yards.


Should check all the boxes.




GR
 
Thanks for all of the replies! My 300 WM is a low end Remington 700 with a plastic stock. I'll probably restock it in walnut and epoxy bed it while I'm at it.
This would definitely be a hunting rifle I could target shoot with, not the other way around. I'm planning on sinking some money into it and want to get the best bang for my buck so to speak.
I have three Remington 700's that are all sub MOA. You might already have a good starting point. A better stock and trigger might do it, or not. A 300 Win Mag has over 1000 ft lbs of energy well over 1000 yards.
 
That's a recipe for running in circles. You might as well buy a cheap chronograph, it would be better. Shooting to determine muzzle velocity is not really a good way to determine it. Also, you won't know how good your load is because you won't have any idea what standard deviation is.
It's not ideal. But I started shooting medium range without one. I researched how to bed an action. Did a trigger job and followed the Audette ladder system to the letter.
My scope wasn't good enough to spot bullet holes so I walked down range after each shot. This sucked when others were shooting. But it worked.
When I could finally afford a chronograph. I was getting an ES in the teens. Granted my estimated velocity was off by 70 fps.
I don't know the OP's mechanical ability. But bedding a 700 isn't terribly difficult.
A pachmeyer decelerator coupled with a brake, decent glass and good reloading supplies will dip his toes in the water. Without too much waste.
 
It's not ideal. But I started shooting medium range without one. I researched how to bed an action. Did a trigger job and followed the Audette ladder system to the letter.
My scope wasn't good enough to spot bullet holes so I walked down range after each shot. This sucked when others were shooting. But it worked.
When I could finally afford a chronograph. I was getting an ES in the teens. Granted my estimated velocity was off by 70 fps.
I don't know the OP's mechanical ability. But bedding a 700 isn't terribly difficult.
A pachmeyer decelerator coupled with a brake, decent glass and good reloading supplies will dip his toes in the water. Without too much waste.

I was talking about measuring bullet drop from velocity. It's a waste of time.
 
Thanks for all of the replies! My 300 WM is a low end Remington 700 with a plastic stock. I'll probably restock it in walnut and epoxy bed it while I'm at it.
This would definitely be a hunting rifle I could target shoot with, not the other way around. I'm planning on sinking some money into it and want to get the best bang for my buck so to speak.
If you shoot targets with a big cal hunting rifle you will smoke the barrel pretty quickly.
Purpose built target/Varmint rifle like a 6 mm will do a much better job of dual duty out to 1000 yards , save the magnum for big game
 
Probably next Spring - Winchester more than not will be offering FN/Winchester M70 rifles chambered in their new long range .277" cartridge - the 6.8 WESTERN.

150-175 gr. Nosler ABLR or equivilant bullets, launched at 3100-2850fps respectively, from a 24"/1:8 twist Bbl'ed FN/Winchester M70 Extreme Weather/SS rifle...?

Will provide 1,500 ft-lbs or energy out to 675 yards - and be supersonic out to 1,300 yards.


Should check all the boxes.




GR

Hmmmm?
I wasn’t really interested in another new rifle, but I like the sounds of that. I’ve got a change barrel, tang safety, Ruger 77 on a heavy laminate wood stock I like to play with, but it’s a short action, most recent barrel I chambered is a 260 Remington Improved, just to be, well not to be a 6.5 Creedmore, probably won’t work. I’m a 270 kind of guy, this might fit right in, hope you’re right!
 
I have started reloading again this year and will definitely be going that route, but I don't think I want to go down the wildcat path.
I do have a chronograph, but it may not be accurate enough for this level.
I wouldn't say I'm recoil sensitive, but I'm not a fan of it either. How much will a muzzle brake help?
As for shooting ability, that could always stand improvement of course. I know the basics and can shoot MOA with pump action 30-06 and a little better with a pawn shop 300 Win mag I got for Christmas last year.
Not really sure how far I'm going to want to take this. 1000 yards may even be further than I feel I need to go, I don't know yet. I do know I want a rifle I can hunt with and not one so specialized that it's only good for the range.

Thanks,
Dean

I use a badger ordnance brake and it helps quite a bit. I would not shoot my rifle without a brake.

It really sounds like you want/need a nice hunting rifle.
 
Long range competition and hunting kind of mutually exclusive characteristics for rifles. Sounds like two guns for the areas that I hunt, because I'm not going to haul around a scoped, slung rifle that weighs more than 10 pounds in our mountainous terrain.

Long Range Competition Rifles - smaller calibers rule (6mm), heavy benchrest and adjustable stock, longer barrels, large target turrets and objectives on scope, very light triggers
Hunting Rifles - caliber dependent on what game one is hunting (generally .264, 284, 30 and larger), lighter stocks, moderate length barrels, locking or non-exposed minimalist turrets, field weight triggers

Not much overlap between the two.

If I were in your shoes, I would find a suitable hunting rifle (look now for a good used rifle, hunting season is finishing in a lot of states) in a good caliber suitable to the game you are desiring to hunt. Then I would buy a Ruger Precision Rifle in 6mm Creedmoor and buy the best glass you can afford for it, components and start competing.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top