Belted cartridges——is there really a difference with their accuracy

Status
Not open for further replies.
The original problem in that regard, from reading I have done, involves the original Nitro Express cartridges that were actually black powder numbers that made the leap to cordite. The rims of these cartridges were thin. When used with a dose of cordite in extreme African temperature conditions, the case would sometimes stick in the chamber and the thin rim would be torn off upon extraction. I doubt that any of us today have actually used one of these cartridges, say the .450/.400 3 1/4 inch Nitro-for-Black. Later cartridges were designed from the outset with thicker rims. See page 550 of the 14th edition Cartridges of the World for a description of this problem.
Like you said, origional problem. That's LONG ago history, and hasn't existed in a long LONG time.

I have never experienced it with any of my DR's, any I have fired, nor have I seen it with anyone elses...

DM
 
Ben Comfort won the Wimbledon with a rifle built by Griffin & Howe and shooting factory ammo loaded by Western Cartridge Co. His win was much protested by shooters who felt the match was only for .30/06 and finally resolved in his favor after hours of debate. Within days of the event, Winchester announced their M-70 target rifle in .300 H&H caliber, which became the rifle and cartridge to beat until 1960's. When I was with the AMTU during my military career we still had and competed with those rifles and factory loaded .300 H&H match ammo. During that time we stitched to the then new .300 Win Mag. We then competed with handloaded .300 Win Mag, always using NEW brass. And using the same ammo in each of our rifles. Which obviously was headspaced on belt, not shoulder. We won lots of matches and for years, even today, the .300 WinMag is a staple in Wimbledon type competitions. Attached are two rifles I've used in such competitions, with both iron sights and scopes. I've never won the Wimbledon, which was a longtime goal, but was twice in the shoot-offs. Was also on record setting two-man team at 1000 yds, firing 7mm RemMag, another belted caliber. Also pic of some Remington .300 H&H match ammo, which was typical fare when the .300 H&H ruled the ranges.View attachment 971954 View attachment 971955

Super information. That is great stuff with great pictures. I am hoping there are always belted magnums around just to remind us of our history and to let us know that just because something is modern doesn't necessarily make it good.
 
As a utilizer of neck sizing, I can tell you that there's still some stretching going on because I still have to fl size and trim every 4-6 firings. I like the proposed ideas, I'm just not fully sold I reckon.

I had a gunsmith tell me that I wouldn't need to trim if I used a mandrel to expand my necks instead of the expander in a sizing die. Yeah, sure. Anyway, I trim every time simply to get all the cases the same length. Just because they start out even doesn't mean they stay that way. I do use a mandrel though because it is easier on the brass and has the potential for being straighter.
 
I had a gunsmith tell me that I wouldn't need to trim if I used a mandrel to expand my necks instead of the expander in a sizing die. Yeah, sure. Anyway, I trim every time simply to get all the cases the same length. Just because they start out even doesn't mean they stay that way. I do use a mandrel though because it is easier on the brass and has the potential for being straighter.

You can also use these expander mandrel.

http://www.xxicsi.com/caliber-specific-expander-mandrels.html
 
I’m surprised this thread is still getting bumped...

Something which keeps nagging at me - because it mimics my own experience - is to acknowledge that while 300wm was a popular LR heavy gun cartridge for some time, winning big matches and setting some records, it’s been out of favor for decades. Interesting, cartridges like the 300WSM still get some play - so a heavy 30 cal at magnum speeds remains viable, however, no one shooting magnum 30’s is still shooting a 300 win mag, but instead those shooters use the WSM. Logistically, a 300wm shooter is rolling along, starts noticing other cartridges beating them out, and they try something new... if the 300wm were superior to the new juice they tried, they’d have gone back to it, but there are real reasons why they did not go back. In that application, being good doesn’t really matter as much as being “best,”, and effectively, “if you’re not first, you’re last.” Those shooters aren’t going to use a cartridge they feel puts them at a disadvantage, so they don’t - and it’s not the 30 cal bullet at magnum speeds which causes the disadvantage, it’s the case.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top