S&W model 27 Old or New?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Nowadays, the models 27, 28, and 29 dash two revolvers are the hot item, being the last of the "pinned and recessed" N frame magnums. I think the pinned barrel is an advantage, avoiding the constriction found in overtorqued tight barrel guns, but the recessed chambers are a cosmetic conceit in a centerfire magnum. Another cranny to clean and hard to chamfer for speed loaders.

In my early days in the Gun Culture, we counted screws. The more screws, the older and therefore presumed better. The -2s were "three screw" guns and looked down on in favor of four and five screw variants. The relevant screws are the side plate screws plus the bolt stop screw, but oddly not including the strain screw.
 
Do you still think more screws are better?
If I am not mistaken I believe many of the pre-27s are five screw.
Are the pre-27 357 magnums or registered magnums superior to the 27-2 in any legitimate ways?
Should anyone pay a premium for them above and beyond the premium paid for a 27-2?
 
Currently I am strongly leaning towards getting another 27-2 or a pre-27.
Either a 3.5 in or a 5 in.
Interestingly all model 627s are unobtainium right now.
I can't find one anywhere so they must be pretty popular.
Personally owning a PC 627 5-in having shot it a lot tells me they are excellent and versatile guns. Super smooth trigger pull in double action and crisp and single action but not quite as accurate as some of my other revolvers.
If I could even get a 627 satin stainless right now in three and a half or four inch barrel I would be seriously considering that right alongside a python or an old model 27.
 
Last edited:
This thread makes we want to break out my 627-0 six shooter. One of the smoothest actions of my revolvers.
 
I doubt earlier variants are any better shooters than a 27-2.

Of course prewar Registered and "unregistered" Magnums are hugely expensive art objects. I don't know of any being shot except some worn, refurbished, or altered examples.
I can't imagine what a "transitional" 1946-1949 with the long action would cost. Fewer than 150 made.
A 27-1 might be a sleeper, only made one year.
 
Nothing really to contribute here, except my 27's: a 3.5 inch "pre 27" and a 5-inch 27-1. Both 5 screws. The pre-27 has been refinished, so has no real collector value (but the bore is great and the action is fine, so it's a shooter).
2018-11-06 12-55-45_0029a1.jpg
 
Last weekend I was in a Sportsman’s Warehouse store 40 miles from home and saw a S&W model 27 Classic with a 4” barrel for sale. The place was busy so I walked away. The price tag was flipped over but I thought I could read $875 through the paper.
Anyway, I thought about it and discussed it with my wife and decided to call the store and see if I could put it on hold to buy it. The store’s phone system was down. Yesterday after 1:00 I was able to get through. Unfortunately the gun had been sold.
I was quite bummed.
This morning I became even more bummed.
It turns out the 4” model 27 is no longer on the California Roster of legal handguns. Only the 6.5” is now. :mad:
 
That's Crazy Pat
I'm just not sure which is more crazy:
The part about California's law or the part about you discussing it with your wife:rofl:
 
That's Crazy Pat
I'm just not sure which is more crazy:
The part about California's law or the part about you discussing it with your wife:rofl:
Yeah, well, peace is a major part of marital bliss. :rofl:

I cannot figure out how that gun was able to sell when not on the list any longer. The only way I can figure it is the gun was actually used, but it looked brand new.

Anyway, it’s a non-issue now. It’s gone.
 
Here is the 1935 order request for a Registered Magnum from then Lt Col George S. Patton. The sight setting is in yards. Maybe meters were an option but there is not a spot on the order form.

The information I wrote in the post about the Registered Magnums is from Roy Jinks' 1977 book History of Smith and Wesson. Roy states, "Each revolver would be sighted in at the factory with any ammunition for any distance out to two hundred meters."

Roy has forgotten more than I will ever know about Smith and Wesson revolvers. I have no idea what distance Patton's revolver was sighted in for, but anyone who wants to dispute Roy is free to do so.
 
Howdy Again

With all this talk about numbers of screws and pre-27 vs 27 I thought I would post a little bit of manufacturing history of The 357 Magnum and Model 27.

As I believe I said earlier, The 357 Magnum began life in as a follow up to the 38/44 Heavy Duty and 38/44 Outdoorsman.

The Registered Magnums were only produced from 1935 until 1938 when the factory registration program was suspended. The 357 Magnum (non-registered) continued to be produced with less customization up until production was halted in 1941.

The 357 Magnum Postwar Transition revolvers were produced from 1946 through the end of 1949. There were only 142 of these produced. This model would have included the re-engineered hammer block inside.

357 Magnum 'Pre-Model' 27. A collector friend of mine likes to say there is no such thing as a Pre-anything. Instead of a Pre-Model 10, the correct name is simply 38 Military and Police Hand Ejector. Likewise he insists there is no such thing as a Pre- Model 27. The Standard Catalog of Smith and Wesson by Supica and Nahas does call out a Pre-Model 27. These are specifically those 357 Magnums manufactured from 1950 until Smith and Wesson adopted a Model Number system in 1957. Physically, this model would have had the new Short Throw Hammers, which replaced the old Long Throw Hammers.

This 38/44 Outdoorsman has the old Long Throw hammer.

poLVKDC8j.jpg




This Model 27 has the Short Throw hammer.

pmGMTj0xj.jpg


This photo illustrates the difference. The Short Throw hammer on the Model 14-3 at the top of the photo is at full cock. The Long Throw hammer on the 38 M&P Target Model at the bottom of the photo is also at full cock. Notice the Long Throw hammer is angled back further than the Short Throw hammer. With any double action revolver the position of the hammer at full cock will be somewhat further back than the position the hammer reaches when it is released in double action. That is simply because of the way that double action revolvers work. Anyway, the engineers at S&W realized that the hammer spring of any revolver has stored enough energy at the double action release point to fire a primer, and any more rearward motion of the hammer is overkill. So the Short Throw hammer was designed to go to full cock at less of an angle than the old Long Throw hammers.

pn4xwVKnj.jpg



As an aside, even though I prefer the older models, I actually prefer the Short Throw hammers on all the newer models. The gullet between the main body of the hammer and the hammer spur is much deeper on the Short Throw hammers, and the knurling is much more pronounced. I find on a hot day my sweaty thumb is more prone to slip off the hammer spur of a Short Throw hammer when I cock it single action. Even on the hottest summer days, that just does not happen with the deep gullet and sharp knurling of a short throw hammer.

End of Aside.

Anyway, that's the short story for Registered 357 Magnums, Non-Registered 357 Magnums, 357 Magnum Post War Transition revolvers and 'Pre-27' 357 Magnum revolvers. By the way, almost all of the above are five screw models, four screws to hold down the side plate and one screw in front of the trigger guard where the spring and plunger for the cylinder stop live. The 38/44 Outdoorsman pictured above shows the four side plate screws. The photo below shows the screw in front of the trigger guard on a typical five screw 38. The side plate screw at the top of the side plate near the hammer was eliminated in 1956 during 'Pre-Model' 27 production.

po8zBkRVj.jpg




OK, 1957 was a banner year for Smith and Wesson because a Model Number naming system was adopted. The 357 Magnum in all of its versions became the Model 27.

S&W would add a dash number to model numbers to signify significant engineering changes. Often these changes would happen at the same time across all the many different models. Sometimes there was a bit of lag time with some models as old stock was used up before the engineering changes were instituted for a specific model. Also, generally speaking, engineering changes were instituted as a cost saving measure, to simplify production and thereby cut down on manufacturing cost.

Let's take a look at all the engineering changes for the Model 27 and the dates they happened. (Source SCSW) The comments in parenthesis are my own comments.

Model 27 (no dash) 1957. Change to the model numbering system.

27-1 (1960): Change extractor rod, right hand to left hand thread. (this change happened about this time across all S&W revolvers. Previously, unless the extractor rod was firmly torqued in place, the rotation of the cylinder tended to unscrew the extractor rod slightly. This would make the revolver difficult to open up because the thumb piece could not shove the internal spring plunger in the extractor rod quite far enough to disengage the spring plunger under the barrel. Reversing the direction of the thread fixed this, normal cylinder rotation tended to tighten the extractor rod rather than loosen it.)

27-2 (1961): Cylinder stop changed, eliminate trigger guard screw. (This changed the Four Screw Smiths to Three Screw Smiths. This is a change that saved production cost. Drilling and tapping a hole adds production cost. In addition, eliminating the screw in front of the trigger guard eliminated two parts from the parts list; the screw and the spring plunger. Personally, I hate taking the cylinder stop and spring out of a modern S&W revolver. With the old design it was simple to install the spring by slipping it into the hole, followed by its plunger and the screw. Now, it is easy to mash the spring out of shape while trying to wedge it in position when installing the spring.)

The photo below shows a cylinder stop spring wedged in position between the frame and the cylinder stop. Easy to mash the spring out of shape when removing it or installing it.

plnMc0uEj.jpg




(1967): 6 1/2" barrel discontinued.

(1968): Delete diamond grip. (Several of the photos above show a diamond shaped area on the grip around the grip screw with no checkering. A few pennies were saved by eliminating that feature.)

1969: Change to "N" serial prefix.

1975: Target trigger, target hammer, Patridge front sight, on 6" and 8 3/8" barrels, introduced with Goncalo Alves target stocks and case.

This Model 19-3 from 1975 has oversized Goncalo Alves target stocks:

pos0MA9Mj.jpg




1979: 3 1/2" and 5" barrel discontinued. 4" introduced with red ramp and white outline rear sight.

1980: Target stocks standard.

27-3: (1982) Eliminate cylinder counterbore and pinned barrel. (This is the pinned and recessed so often referred to. Purely a cost savings move. Eliminating the pinned barrel eliminated several assembly steps. A tighter fitting thread on the barrel was used so the barrel would not unscrew. Eliminating the recessed couterbores eliminated a machining step.) Small change in cylinder length to 1.57"

1986: Discontinue nickel finish.

27-4 (1988): New yoke retention system/radius stud package/floating hand.

27-5 (1990): Longer stop notch in cylinder.

1992: Discontinue 4" and 8 3/8" barrel.

27-6 (1993): Hogue grips, drill and tap frame, change rear sight leaf, change extractor.

1994: Model 27 discontinued.

27-7 (2000) Performance Center version/8 shot, built on the N frame-with floating firing pin and extended frame lug-Special.

As can be seen, sometimes engineering changes rated a new dash number, some years not.


P.S. My Model 27 pictured above is a 27 No Dash. It left the factory in 1959. It is a Four Screw. Three screws holding down the side plate, one hiding under the top corner of the Magna style grips, and the screw in front of the trigger guard is not visible in that photo, but it is there.
 
Last edited:
This morning I became even more bummed.
It turns out the 4” model 27 is no longer on the California Roster of legal handguns. Only the 6.5” is now. :mad:

That's Crazy Pat
I'm just not sure which is more crazy:
The part about California's law or the part about you discussing it with your wife:rofl:

It turns out that I was wrong, but not because of a mistake on my part. The California DOJ, for whatever reason, listed the model 27 with a 4” barrel as an M27-9. Why that is, I do not know, but I am happy that the 4” is available here.
This is how it is listed:
M27-9 SKU 150339A

I have decided that the 4” barrel length is the one I am interested in so if I find a new one or a used one in good condition I plan to buy it...and now that I have said that “out loud” so to speak, a smoking deal on a 586 or a Ruger Blackhawk Convertible will pop up. :D
 
357 Magnum 'Pre-Model' 27. A collector friend of mine likes to say there is no such thing as a Pre-anything. Instead of a Pre-Model 10, the correct name is simply 38 Military and Police Hand Ejector. Likewise he insists there is no such thing as a Pre- Model 27. The Standard Catalog of Smith and Wesson by Supica and Nahas does call out a Pre-Model 27. These are specifically those 357 Magnums manufactured from 1950 until Smith and Wesson adopted a Model Number system in 1957. Physically, this model would have had the new Short Throw Hammers, which replaced the old Long Throw Hammers.

Thank you. I learned something new today. :cool:
I didn’t know about the long throw hammer but knew there was something a little different in the appearance of older S&W’s. I noticed in the two photos with the 38/44 Outdoorsman and the Model 27 that the Long Throw Hammer spur appears to sit a little higher in relation to the top of the frame.
 
Howdy Again

What you are noticing is the deeper gullet between the body of the Short Throw hammer and the hammer spur. This is one reason I prefer this hammer shape. As one is cocking the hammer single action, the thumb naturally rides down into the deep gullet of the Short Throw hammer, allowing good contact between the hammer and the thumb throughout the cocking sequence. This is the hammer on a N frame 44 Hand Ejector, 4th Model from 1955.

poDINUhbj.jpg




It is easier for the thumb to slip off the shallow gullet of the old Long Throw hammer while cocking it. This is the hammer on a K frame 38 Military and Police from 1939. Even though these two hammers are from different sized frames, the differences in shape should be apparent.

poW0f61Mj.jpg




Also, the knurling on the Short Throw hammer is much deeper. Assuring a solid grip between hammer and thumb. In fact, the knurling on these hammers is so deep and sharp one can almost cut oneself on it. This is a K frame Model 19-3 from 1975.

pnB0ia8Vj.jpg




The knurling was much shallower on the old Long Throw hammer. If the revolver is old and worn, the knurling can be almost nonexistent. As I said, it is easy for a sweaty thumb to completely slip off the old Long Throw hammer while cocking the hammer. This is K-22 Outoorsman from 1932. The knurling is still quite sharp on this one, but I have a few old Smiths that have the knurling almost worn off the hammer. Notice this hammer is marked REG. US. PAT. OFF. For a while, S&W was granted a trademark on their characteristic color case hardened hammers and triggers. The triggers had the same marking on the back. This was an effort to keep cheap imitation S&W revolvers made in Europe from being imported. Eventually the government reversed itself and the trademark was revoked, so after that time hammers were no longer marked this way.

pmWwLFnij.jpg




This is a transitional Short Throw hammer often called the Speed Hammer. This style was not used for very long. Sorry, I don't know the exact dates, but this revolver is a K-38 that shipped in 1950. Notice it has the modern style of hammer block.

pnuhl32Xj.jpg




This is an interesting variation on the old Long Throw hammer. The sides of the hammer on this Model 1917, that shipped in 1918 were grooved. The idea was the grooves would hold lubrication. I don't think this variation was done for very long.

pokBXrA7j.jpg




Another style of Long Throw hammer was the Humpback hammer. This was a custom hammer available on the Registered Magnums and other S&W revolvers starting in the 1930s. Basically, there was no gullet at all between the body of the hammer and the hammer spur. I don't have one in my collection, but they can be seen if one googles Smith and Wesson Humpback Hammer.
 
Well I got my quota of reading in for the day.
Thanks for the info driftwood very interesting.
BTW when was the diamond cutting on the top eliminated?
Was that with the 27-3?
Which iteration would you say is the most desirable functionally and why?
 
Here is a humback hammer, on the 5” M&P. The 6 1/2” M&P has the standard long action hammer.

A782B06B-090C-4C92-9571-DEA1B9BA367F.jpeg

All this talk about thumbs slipping off hammers, just shoot double action and you won’t have that problem


Kevin
 
BTW when was the diamond cutting on the top eliminated?
Was that with the 27-3?
Which iteration would you say is the most desirable functionally and why?


If you are talking about the checkering on the top strap and barrel rib, I don't think it has ever been eliminated. I had to do a lot of googling to find a photo of the recent Model 27 that S&W is offering in their Classic Line, but I did find one, and it clearly still has the checkering on the top strap and barrel rib. It certainly does not show up in the engineering changes that the checkering on the top strap and barrel rib was ever eliminated. Checkering on the top strap and barrel rib was one of the hallmarks of the original 357 Magnum revolver, and its successor the Model 27. No other production line S&W revolver has ever had the checkering on top of the top strap and barrel rib.

Perhaps you are thinking about the Model 28, and its predecessor the Highway Patrolman. The Model 28 was similar in every way to the Model 27, but it had a dull finish.

This photo shows the top strap of a Model 28 at the top, and a Model 27 at the bottom.

poe7zHU1j.jpg




I do not feel qualified to answer your second question. The only Model 27 I own is my Model 27 no dash that left the factory in 1959. It is the only Model 27 I have ever fired, so I am not qualified to comment on other versions. I don't know anybody else who owns one, they are not exactly falling out of trees.

There is a funny story behind the box it came with. That is actually one of the The 357 Magnum boxes, not a Model 27 box. Smith and Wesson was famous for never throwing anything out. This is one of the 'gold' boxes that were in use from 1946 until 1965. It does not say Model 27 on it, it says The 357 Magnum Revolver on it. On the end of the box, Nickel Finish has been crossed out, and a sticker applied saying Blued Finish. Also, the box has 6 1/2" barrel printed on it, but this Model 27 has a 6" barrel. The box has Model 27 written in pen on the bottom, and the correct Serial Number has been written on the bottom of the box in grease pencil. Clearly, S&W was using up some old boxes when they shipped my Model 27.

pnvS3gDSj.jpg
 
My 627-0 even has a checkered frame on top. Did they do this for all iterations of the 627 as well?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top