Underrated EDC handguns?

Status
Not open for further replies.

38-45 Special

Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2020
Messages
39
As we are in odd times (and with firearms and ammunition flying off the shelves like nobody's business), some new gun owners may be left with slim pickings for their first firearm; particularly handguns. With this in mind, it got me to thinking about some lesser considered EDCs. What would you consider to be an underrated EDC type of firearm?

To me, it would be any number of the Iver Johnson top break revolvers. Despite the fact that they are an older firearm, I feel that (if loaded correctly) these would be a decent EDC if it was all one had. Also, an honorable mention to the H&R 732.
 
I have a version of the H&R 732 (made by NEF) in 32 H&R magnum. While not my first choice, it's in an okay SD caliber. I own one and my FiL owns one. They go bang every time. I doubt they'd keep going bang for tens of thousands of rounds, But it's a bare-bones five-shot snubby that works. (I bought them for next to nothing so we could experiment with shooting and reloading the caliber.)

Hi-Points go bang. The 380 might be small enough.

The Makarov and variants are kind of heavy, but reliable and shoot a decent cartridge.

IIRC, H&R and IJ made small revolvers in 38 S&W as well. One of those in good mechanical condition would be okay.

There are a slew of older 25 and 32 pocket pistols. Some are well-known and some are obscure, but there are some good reliable ones in the mix. There's been a couple of threads about them lately.

Taurus makes some models that are pretty solid and some I wouldn't consider purchasing. Their updated Model 85 snubbies (forget the new model number), their tip-up Baretta derivatives in 22 & 25, and their G2 series have all been good, in my experience.

There are Czech and Hungarian military surplus 32 Walther derivatives that are reliable and small enough.

I have owned some very capable Turkish pistols, a Tisas and three SAR's. Most people have no idea that they are, so you might see one in the case that others have passed by.

It seems like it's all about knowledge. 55-year-old me could walk into an old gun store with some obscure stuff in it, and probably walk out with a decent EDC or HD handgun for not too much money. 21-year-old me would barely know what he was looking at and might walk out with anything.

Here is an SAR. It's a CZ75 compact derivative with a polymer frame. Back before this craziness I paid barely more than $250 for it OTD. It goes bang every time and would be perfectly valid for HD or EDC.

 
Last edited:
1911 - I've read they are still available when Shield, Glocks are not.
Capacity may be a factor, but if living in a 10 round state, or if ever there is a stupid nationwide AWB and no grandfathering, 1911.
Weight may be a factor, but a good belt and/or a lightweight version helps, plus the thinness is conducive to concealed carry.
The preceding was from someone currently with a Glock IWB, but who also likes 1911s. ;)
 
I like the S&W SD9 or SD40s, before the panic they were 200$ on sale and around 150$ used. I sometimes carry a Taurus snub nose 38 over a hammer less S&W in an ankle holster.
 
A lot of the guns I would have suggested have already been brought up. The later model Iver Johnson revolvers in good mechanical condition are an option of one understands their limitations and loads them properly. I certainly believe mine will serve its function as a close range defense weapon.

index.php


The 1911 is also an obvious excellent choice, given relative availability of the various 1911 pattern guns on the market and their price versus more modern options.

2F6FCCBA-C364-45FD-8D05-2D1BDB836132.jpeg
 
I know there's PLENTY of members on here that still carry revolvers, but I think they are becoming more and more overlooked as a whole. Especially now that you can get higher capacity 9mm's like the P365 and Hellcat in a similarly sized package as j-frames.
 
"Underated EDC handguns"? Anything in .32 caliber. The .32 Long and Magnum catch a bad rap from most folks for defensive purposes. The Long was marketed to LEOs up till the early/mid 70s as a law enforcement option. They worked then and they work now. A J/I Frame in .32 holds 6 rounds of .32 Long ammo vs. 5 rounds of .38 Special ammo. Extra round, same size, same holster options. Count me in.

With handloading it opens even more options in that regard too. All of my .32 wheelguns were very affordable and shoot great. They are an option.....
 
I don't know that there are "underrated" handguns so much as there are current standards which the really old or obscure handguns don't meet. What one person considers underrated may not be by someone else. My shot at objective criteria is reliability and effectiveness (which I take as 32 ACP or better).

But I see nothing wrong with going with what's available that met old standards but not modern standards if that's all you can get... and also feed it.

I'd say my lowest quality modern cartridge launcher is a SCCY CPX-2 9mm. I would choose that over an old/antique revolver and cartridge because my copy has proven reliable. It shoots a good round and carries 10+1, and I can feed it.
 
Many shops around me have just enough handguns to make a reasonable EDC choice possible. But, the local ammo selection is still virtually nil for any of the guns I see in in gun shops. Which means some new gun owners may simply have a paper weight.
 
Last edited:
I just watched a YT vid about using a 32ACP instead of 380 ACP, if you indeed wanted a 'pocket' pistol..Beretta Tomcat vs a Ruger LCP..for instance since the ammo capabilities are similar but the 32ACP lots easier to shoot.

PLUS 32acp way cheaper than 380 right now.

https://www.handgunhero.com/compare/beretta-3032-tomcat-vs-ruger-lcp

The main reason I got into .32 ACP many years ago was that .380 ammo was virtually unobtainium at the dawn of the .380 polymer pocket pistol boom.
 
I know there's PLENTY of members on here that still carry revolvers, but I think they are becoming more and more overlooked as a whole. Especially now that you can get higher capacity 9mm's like the P365 and Hellcat in a similarly sized package as j-frames.

A j-frame sized revolver with 5 or 6 shots is a good choice and several seem to be always available for sale during these weird times.
 
A j-frame sized revolver with 5 or 6 shots is a good choice and several seem to be always available for sale during these weird times.

Though, it does seem that .38 special and .357 mag are far harder to find right now and jframes need regular practice to keep up with, especially if you're one of those masochists who like .357 mag in small guns :evil:

Local gun shop said .380 and .38 special were the hardest calibers to find and 9mm and .45 were almost close to being available in reasonable volume.
 
Plenty of Taurus, Charter Arms and other small revolvers out there that work well for very good used prices. Two weeks ago I picked up a near new Charter Bulldog .44 for $299. Also for consideration are guns like my Sig 239. It was all the rage and a pricey gun when new. But with all the micro 9’s and newer models out it’s not as desirable and can be had for less than you would think. Still a very packable and shootable single stack pistol. I was ogling a Star BM 9mm on Gunbroker the other day with a buy it now for $299. Those were good guns.
 
I don't know that there are "underrated" handguns so much as there are current standards which the really old or obscure handguns don't meet. What one person considers underrated may not be by someone else. My shot at objective criteria is reliability and effectiveness (which I take as 32 ACP or better).

But I see nothing wrong with going with what's available that met old standards but not modern standards if that's all you can get... and also feed it.

I'd say my lowest quality modern cartridge launcher is a SCCY CPX-2 9mm. I would choose that over an old/antique revolver and cartridge because my copy has proven reliable. It shoots a good round and carries 10+1, and I can feed it.

I agree with standards that some don't meet, lesser than 9mm has few ammo options (if any) that penetrate at least 12'' and consistently expand (a standard).
Effectiveness, we could say that at least 12'' penetration and consistent expansion (standard) is a measure of desired effectiveness (ASAP incapacitation potential)
Of course, desired effectiveness (ASAP incapacitation potential) is not reduced based on location... ;) 9mm minimum, everywhere.
 
Glock 36. Light, slim and reasonably soft shooting it's criticized for capacity but I think that's because it's always compared to the g30. It's my favorite 45acp pistol.

My G36 fits my hands so weirdly, but it shoots so well for me. Too bad it has the red headed step child of Glock magazine selection.

A great gun for those that like what it offers. :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top