Commercial Semi-wadcutters on game

Status
Not open for further replies.

hossfly

Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2007
Messages
206
Location
Greenwood, SC
As much is as cast bullets on game is talked about, I haven't really seen too many discussions from people who have used mass produced cast bullets. I ask specifically because I have an abundance of .431 240 grain SWC Oregon Trail lasercast and a 629 that likes them with 10 grains of Unique. I also have an abundance of .430 Missouri Bullet SWC and an Anaconda that likes them with the same charge. The clocked speed with both revolvers with these loads is a bit over 1100fps.

If any of you guys have taken deer or other game with any of the SWC's produced by Missouri Bullets, Bayou Bullets, Oregon Trail, etc, I'd love to hear about them. We know cast Keith's work, but the mass produced casts hit the sweet spot for me regarding economy and time spent.
 
I used to hunt a lot with a 6 ½” model 29 and a 6” 629. I used the same 10 gr Unique load as you with Oregon Trail, Bullet Meister and Missouri bullets and had good luck with them. I never shot anything large but did use it for several deer, javelina, coyotes, etc. I was only able to recover one bullet, a head shot which went the length of a javelina. It stayed together.

I don’t think you’ll go wrong with any of the bullets you mentioned.
 
A We know cast Keith's work, but the mass produced casts hit the sweet spot for me regarding economy and time spent.

IMHO, any SWC is a variation of a "Keith" style bullet since in Keith’s time, the only other bullet types were Wadcutter (WC) and round-nose (RN), both of which he felt were inferior hunting bullet designs. Why would a quality mass produced cast bullet perform terminally any differently on game than a home cast bullet?
 
I am not a hunter so please explain why you are going hunting with a reduced load.

There were numerous other bullet designs in Keith's day. He adapted several of them and his own ideas to produce what we now think of as the Keith semiwadcutter.
I think most of the revolver semiwadcutters you see now are closer to the Sharpe design, shorter and lighter than Keith's. A real Keith mould comes out about 245 grains in the usual antimonial alloy but was 250 grains with Elmers lead and tin.
 
I am not a hunter so please explain why you are going hunting with a reduced load.

There were numerous other bullet designs in Keith's day. He adapted several of them and his own ideas to produce what we now think of as the Keith semiwadcutter.
I think most of the revolver semiwadcutters you see now are closer to the Sharpe design, shorter and lighter than Keith's. A real Keith mould comes out about 245 grains in the usual antimonial alloy but was 250 grains with Elmers lead and tin.


Oh I've always hunted with full loads...usually jacketed. I was just curious about the experience people who have used these bullets have had. If they used a light load I was curious about that too.
 
I am not a hunter so please explain why you are going hunting with a reduced load.

Depending on the game, there's not always a good reason to use full power loads.

That 10gr Unique under a 240gr SWC is moving pretty good. It's likely north of 1000fps. That should punch right through deer sized game stem to stern. Other than making it more difficult to manage recoil I'm not sure what an extra 400fps gets you unless you're either chasing bigger game, or really stretching the distance.
 
Just resurrecting this thread because I read the one below. I've certainly lost and seen deer lost with modern jacketed rifle loads but those were instances where the shooter was to blame. This gentleman seems to have put the bullet exactly where it needed to go. Wheel weights are softer than the commercial cast bullets so I just have some discomfort about the lack of expansion. Do you guys who have used these loads have any thoughts or inputs or experiences that add to this gentleman's experience?

https://www.thehighroad.org/index.php?threads/first-and-maybe-last-flat-point-deer.861173/
 
240gns of lead chugging along at 1000fps is nothing to scoff at. Plenty of power for most things that walk and crawl

I know, right?

Alas in my state, that 1100 fps load with the 240 grain bullet would be just under the legal minimum..., which is set for handguns in my state at 700 ftlbs..., BUT the solution would be to up the load a teeny amount to get 1150 fps.

LD
 
That’s a shame. Fortunately where I am at the only stipulation for big game with a handgun is a minimum 4” barrel and .24 caliber or larger. Center fire only. and .22 Rimfire is approved for cougars
 
I've killed more deer and hogs with that load than any other. It works with boring regularity. An expanding bullet at higher velocity will tend to work quicker but the SWC is cheap, plentiful and does everything I need it to without fanfare. Most run less than 50yds. I remember a heart-shot 200lb hog that barely got turned around to run away when he rolled over and went to Jesus.

I would say the experience the guy in the other thread had is atypical. However, as buck460 noted, some critters just wanna live. I had a doe run 100yds up a 100ft hill with a .54cal roundball at 1850fps through both lungs. Not every kill is going to be textbook.
 
I've killed more deer and hogs with that load than any other. It works with boring regularity. An expanding bullet at higher velocity will tend to work quicker but the SWC is cheap, plentiful and does everything I need it to without fanfare. Most run less than 50yds. I remember a heart-shot 200lb hog that barely got turned around to run away when he rolled over and went to Jesus.

I would say the experience the guy in the other thread had is atypical. However, as buck460 noted, some critters just wanna live. I had a doe run 100yds up a 100ft hill with a .54cal roundball at 1850fps through both lungs. Not every kill is going to be textbook.

Yeah if theres one thing I've learned hunting during the course of my no longer young life is sometimes weird stuff just happens.
 
I know, right?

Alas in my state, that 1100 fps load with the 240 grain bullet would be just under the legal minimum..., which is set for handguns in my state at 700 ftlbs..., BUT the solution would be to up the load a teeny amount to get 1150 fps.

LD
Yeah you have a lot of options to get a few more fps. Even with Unique theres room.
 
The question I would pose is:
Since the bullets at those velocities are giving passthroughs, and they are not traveling fast enough for the “shock” factor to come into play, then what is really gained by pushing the bullet a couple hundred feet faster and increasing the recoil?
 
The question I would pose is:
Since the bullets at those velocities are giving passthroughs, and they are not traveling fast enough for the “shock” factor to come into play, then what is really gained by pushing the bullet a couple hundred feet faster and increasing the recoil?
Real world....there probably isn't any but in Dave's case it's an arbitrary game law.
 
Real world....there probably isn't any but in Dave's case it's an arbitrary game law.
Oh I agree. I didn’t mean from a legal standpoint. It’s like guys who hunt with a 45-70 with a 405gr cast bullet and black powder. And the guys who take that same cartridge/bullet over a heavy dose of 3031 driving it 500fps faster. The 3031 guys really aren’t gaining anything except more sore shoulders.
 
Lot to be said for a solid, cheap, load which you can shoot a lot but still gets the job done well. I think the 240gr LSWC is a great option in a .44.

Looking for a similar load for a 44SPC and 41mag. Keep it mostly simple and have one load I use most of the time, get good with it and leave it be.
 
The question I would pose is:
Since the bullets at those velocities are giving passthroughs, and they are not traveling fast enough for the “shock” factor to come into play, then what is really gained by pushing the bullet a couple hundred feet faster and increasing the recoil?

Excellent point.

The real question is, why is the black powder rifle threshold pretty much the same as the modern handgun threshold of 700 ftlbs. (give or take a 100 ftlbs.) ? YET the muzzleloaders are still as lethal at 100 yards or less as the modern rifle that has to reach an additional 500 ftlbs. (At least for me over the past 20 years the empirical results using a flintlock have shown it to be so.) :confused:

Further..., some folks are worried about hunters accidentally or carelessly "shooting out of safe", for those not familiar with the phrase, it's a round that travels outside the public or private lands where hunting is permitted, landing in a neighborhood. Yet..., in the areas where this was a prime concern, they legalized straight walled cartridges like the .45-70, .450 Bushmaster, .450 Marlin, .350 Legend and etc.o_O

When I first heard they were going to allow fixed ammunition in the once muzzleloader and shotgun only areas, I expected the regulation would adopt .357 magnum, .41 Magnum, .45 Colt, and .45 Winchester Magnum, and so on..., pistol cartridges in carbines...., because on paper these look a lot like the already approved muzzleloaders, loaded with bullets like TC Maxi-balls, etc. Nope, ANY straight walled cartridge is good as long as from the rifle it hits 1200 ftlbs.

As for your point, my .450 Bushmaster rifle delivers 2700 ft.lbs with a factory load. Yes it can be a tad "harsh" on recoil and the cost per shot is like shooting the most expensive shotgun shells made.

I however, handload for my .450 Bushmaster, a lead alloy, hollow point bullet, and step down the load to get a muzzle velocity 40% below the factory ammo, and it works just fine, reduces the barrel leading, and doesn't beat me up with recoil. ;) (Costs less than half the factory ammo too :D) IF I was going to be reaching out to 200 yards or a little farther, I might go back to factory loads, but as I'm hunting terrain that's 100 yard shots or less, regardless of the firearm used, there's no reason for the factory ammo.

LD
 
Lot to be said for a solid, cheap, load which you can shoot a lot but still gets the job done well. I think the 240gr LSWC is a great option in a .44.

Looking for a similar load for a 44SPC and 41mag. Keep it mostly simple and have one load I use most of the time, get good with it and leave it be.

I've used 7.5 unique in 44 spc cases in the same revolvers and clocked at 950. With that said...don't put that in any old 44 special revolvers. I believe I would use those in 44 mag only. My only reason for doing that was I found unique started burning dirty when I got below 9 grains or so in 44 magnum cases.
 
The only thing I would worry about with commercial cast SWC is that a lot of the commercial casters use very hard alloys and since that means lots of antimony and probably very little tin, they tend to be brittle. Perhaps in a pistol load with the bullet doing 1100FPS out of the barrel they are not going fast enough at impact to shatter if they hit a big bone. I know that I would not be eager to use bullets much above 12 BHN in a rifle and I would want them to have a good bit of tin in them.
 
A few hundred extra feet per second will flatten the trajectory a bit, if that is important. It also places a lot more stress on the bullet, which increases the risk of failure.

What I never got is people using 400gr bullets in the .45/70 for deer sized critters. You'll get the same result with 250's with less recoil and a flatter trajectory.


Craig do you have a preferred swc you use for hunting?
For deer, it really doesn't matter. I've used them from various makers. I still have bullets I bought from Space Coast cast bullets when I lived in Florida. I've used them from Hunter's Supply, Oregon Trail, Meister, Leadhead's, Rimrock, Matt's, Mt. Baldy, Montana Bullet Works, etc.. I was using Tennessee Valley for a while as they were semi-local but the last few years it's been mostly Missouri Cast Bullet. Beartooth makes some of the best premium bullets on the market. Grizzly's (Cast Performance) customer service sucks, so I don't recommend them at all unless you buy from a 3rd party retailer like Midway.
 
On the speed discussion my Marlin just don't like them. I recently tried Bayou Bullets .432 240 and my 629 loves them but my 1894 starts keyholing them at 75 yards with 19 grains of 2400. Not every one...but one is too many. Now there wasn't any keyholing at 50 and they would do minute of deer but they just simply won't compare to jacketed bullets. That said would you expect them not to stay together at 1600 fps. That's something I would not have considered
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top