CZ 457 Precision Chassis Review

Status
Not open for further replies.

marksman13

Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2006
Messages
3,463
Location
Mississippi
Picked up a CZ 457 Precision Chassis last week. Finally got a chance to shoot it this evening, so I thought I throw together a quick review after putting a hundred rounds through it.

First, the set up. As soon as I ordered the rifle (I went with the 16” barrel) I ordered an Area 419 15 MOA rail because the 11mm dove tail that CZ builds into their receivers is just dumb and limits scope options. Take note CZ. This needs to be changed in the next iteration. Next, I mounted a Bushnell Forge 2.5-15x50 that I had lying around in a set of Burris 30mm rings. I also used a small section of M-Lok rail to mount my Atlas bipod. Kudos to CZ for jumping on board the M-Lok chassis train. Really handy system. After throwing on a Magpul sling using the provided QD attachment points, all I had to do was screw on my Huntertown arms suppressor and I was ready to plink away.

BE038F6C-CF32-4226-972A-7B97029335F6.jpeg
I have a good supply of CCI Sub-Sonic Small Game ammo put back, so that is what I decided to focus on shooting today. I did shoot a few rounds of American Eagle Suppressor stuff, but only to see if there was any difference in noise level. Note: the AE stuff was noticeably quieter than the CCI and POI was a good bit lower.

I set up in my back yard and since my closest target is 55 yards, that’s where I zeroed the rifle and started the accuracy testing. I’ll go to the range in the next couple of days and I’ll shoot some groups at 25, 50 and 100 yards, and I’ll also try some match ammo to see what the rifle is really capable of, but for now, we’ll have to settle for the results with CCI Sub-Sonic at 55 yards. The first group was absolutely atrocious. I’ve owned some rifles that were dogs right out of the gate, but I’ve never owned a 22LR that settled down so much between the first round and the 20th round. First group was fired before I zeroed the scope, so there’s no target in the picture for reference. That’s my fault, but with the third round flying high and left, it was nearly 4” outside to outside at 55 yards. Pretty disappointing way to start out with a rifle who’s name invokes “Precision”.
ABC7707D-E367-4DCC-850D-ABB118583E06.jpeg
I know rimfire take some breaking in, so I just moved along and shot a second five shot group after getting a rough zero established. It still wasn’t a group worthy of the precision moniker, but the second group was much better. That’s a 2” target circle and I saw the gun was at least showing some potential.

EB8C8992-8C18-447F-9AE2-2875DEA06D32.jpeg I spent the next few five round mags shooting an 8”x8” steel plate at a hundred yards. I didn’t walk down to get pictures, but all rounds were on the plate. After playing for a little bit, I decided to come back to 55 yards and shoot one final five shot group. This group would have met my expectations of the gun if I had done my part. A bird flew across my scope as I was squeezing off the fifth round and my lack of discipline in that moment pushed the round low and to the right. That group was fired at a 1” target circle.

E4E594E6-03B4-4DE4-A0DB-8058FADD4E43.jpeg


Really informal initial shoot on this rifle, but I couldn’t wait any longer to put some rounds through it. My initial impression is pretty positive and I’m curious to see how the rifle shoots with match ammo. I’m still incredibly impressed with the Bushnell Forge series of scopes for the money. I think I paid $400 for this one from Midway when they put them on clearance. I’m convinced there is nothing in the $500-$700 range that will compete with them. I’ll make some additional posts after I get this rifle out to the range for real tomorrow or the next day. Hopefully someone will find the info useful. Thanks for taking the time to read through my ramblings.
 
I picked up a 457 At-One around Christmas I'm still trying to figure out. I've put about 8 different types of CCI, Elay, SK and Aguila through it and 1.5" groups at 50 yards seems normal with just a handful touching .75", with no consistency. 200 rounds through the gun now, but I think I saw some weird Matrix like blips through the scope the last time I had it out, so I need to swap out the scope with something I trust for the next outing. I really hope it's the scope, because even my Marlin 60 with it's 9lb trigger shoots better than this.

Right now there's an Athlon Helos 8-34x56 I bought specifically for this gun, but I have a
 
I picked up a 457 At-One around Christmas I'm still trying to figure out. I've put about 8 different types of CCI, Elay, SK and Aguila through it and 1.5" groups at 50 yards seems normal with just a handful touching .75", with no consistency. 200 rounds through the gun now, but I think I saw some weird Matrix like blips through the scope the last time I had it out, so I need to swap out the scope with something I trust for the next outing. I really hope it's the scope, because even my Marlin 60 with it's 9lb trigger shoots better than this.

Right now there's an Athlon Helos 8-34x56 I bought specifically for this gun, but I have a
Might be the scope, but that's about all my .22 barrel would do. After tinkering (alot of tinkering) my 795 beat it handily with most ammo i have on hand.
The .17 barrel would stack shotz at 100yds no problem, and the .22 LW barrel it currently wears shoots .5-1" with the ammo ive got......so at least MY gun was probably the barrel. Thankfully they are easy to change.
 
No pictures today, but thus far, I’m just not impressed at all with this rifle given the thousand dollar price tag. To this point the rifle has digested 200 rounds of CCI subsonic ammo, fifty rounds of Federal GMM, 50 rounds of American Eagle subsonic and 50 rounds of Federal Auto Match and the best group it has delivered to this point was just over 1 MOA at 50 yards. I’ve still got several different types of ammo to try, so I’m not throwing in the towel. Just a bit disappointed at the moment. My M&P 15-22 shot every bit as well as the 457 today.
 
Thousand dollar rifle?! You must be talking about the rifle, the scope and the chassis? I bought a 457 (.22LR) last month and I thought they were a little expensive at MSRP, but I paid that because... there just isn't any stock in any of the gun stores these days, where you can shop for a deal. There was one CZ in the store and that was it. To date, I've tested 11 (eleven) different brands of .22 rimfire. I pulled out my stock of .22 ammo that I've collected over the years (lots of years) and pulled out some of the really old stuff for comparison. Some of the oldest is a brick of PETER'S TARGET in red boxes, some Winchester LEADER, STAYNLESS (1950s or 60s?), and some old Remington white boxed bricks with an NSN # on them and no information on what the bullet weight is. Interesting stuff. At 50 yards I got 1/2" 5-shot groups with the old original CCI Mini-Mag 36 grain copper hollow points. Coming in a close second were, Federal bulk pack 36 grain copper, high velocity, and Winchester Super-X 37 grain HV HP. Next were Federal Classic SV 40 gr. LRN. Surprisingly enough, the Peter's Target (circa 1960) came in mid-pack. S&B were worse, PMC Zapper were down a ways and the list goes on.

The rifle is a standard CZ-457 American, with an older Leupold Rimfire Special 2-7X scope. I thought it shot quite well for a factory rifle with no mods. It does have a wonderful trigger right out of the box, with no further adjustment needed. I've learned though, that all .22 rimfires are picky about what ammo they like. Mine goes from 1/2" groups to small shotgun-like patterns with some ammo. It doesn't seem to care about ammo cost either - some of the cheaper stuff shoots better than expensive stuff. Hope you find what yours likes.
 
Last edited:
Yeah... I would love to have the matching .17HMR, but in a separate rifle so I don't have to swap barrels. At present, I have a Savage 93 in .17HMR and I WISH it could be a CZ. I've spent more $ getting the Savage to shoot well, than it cost in the first place... and it's probably not as good as a box-stock CZ!
 
Yeah i have a savage 93 too. Pre accu trigger model with wood stock. I like wood over plastic. But it's 4lb pull. So not to bad. I got it for 160.00 on clearance at walmart. My 300.00 Burris scope is on it at the moment.
 
You are frightening the owner of a 457 Varmint that has not yet been shot. I don't have the words to express how much I want to shoot the 3 new rifles I still have not tried. I hate pandemics.
 
Thousand dollar rifle?! You must be talking about the rifle, the scope and the chassis? I bought a 457 (.22LR) last month and I thought they were a little expensive at MSRP, but I paid that because... there just isn't any stock in any of the gun stores these days, where you can shop for a deal. There was one CZ in the store and that was it. To date, I've tested 11 (eleven) different brands of .22 rimfire. I pulled out my stock of .22 ammo that I've collected over the years (lots of years) and pulled out some of the really old stuff for comparison. Some of the oldest is a brick of PETER'S TARGET in red boxes, some Winchester LEADER, STAYNLESS (1950s or 60s?), and some old Remington white boxed bricks with an NSN # on them and no information on what the bullet weight is. Interesting stuff. At 50 yards I got 1/2" 5-shot groups with the old original CCI Mini-Mag 36 grain copper hollow points. Coming in a close second were, Federal bulk pack 36 grain copper, high velocity, and Winchester Super-X 37 grain HV HP. Next were Federal Classic SV 40 gr. LRN. Surprisingly enough, the Peter's Target (circa 1960) came in mid-pack. S&B were worse, PMC Zapper were down a ways and the list goes on.

The rifle is a standard CZ-457 American, with an older Leupold Rimfire Special 2-7X scope. I thought it shot quite well for a factory rifle with no mods. It does have a wonderful trigger right out of the box, with no further adjustment needed. I've learned though, that all .22 rimfires are picky about what ammo they like. Mine goes from 1/2" groups to small shotgun-like patterns with some ammo. It doesn't seem to care about ammo cost either - some of the cheaper stuff shoots better than expensive stuff. Hope you find what yours likes.

Nope. The rifle was $1000 out the door. The bare rifle. And that was the best price I have found on the Varmint Precision Chassis. MSRP is $1039.00 on that rifle. I’m going to keep playing with it, but it’s a little disappointing considering my old CZ 513 Trainer would shoot under MOA at 50 yards all the time. I never should have sold that cheap, little rifle.

After shooting 22s all day with a buddy of mine, I’m thinking about picking up another 22 LR. Maybe a Christensen Arms Ranger if I can find enough decent reviews. May end up buying a barrel for this CZ down the road too. I’ve shot almost nothing but centerfire rifles for the past few years. I’d forgotten how much fun rimfire stuff can be.
 
I hope you get it sorted. I agree rim fire can be a lot of fun. I like to see how far i can push my guns with accuracy. I find CCI ammo to work good for my 457. I didn't think of the ammo shortage possibly effecting Frostbite. I hope all the new folks learn from this shortage and stock up for the next one.
 
I hope you get it sorted. I agree rim fire can be a lot of fun. I like to see how far i can push my guns with accuracy. I find CCI ammo to work good for my 457. I didn't think of the ammo shortage possibly effecting Frostbite. I hope all the new folks learn from this shortage and stock up for the next one.

I’m definitely going to keep after it. I’ve still got several brands of ammo left to try and I broke it down tonight to clean it and check torque on all the screws. We’ll see how it shoots the next time I’m off.
 
How does the plandemic stop you from shooting?
The region where I live is different from where I shoot. The range has been closed for long periods. Travel has been restricted. I have been sick. Other reasons related to restrictions in place because of the pandemic. Three guns, plenty of ammo (bought when the guns were to be ordered), very bad timing doesn't let it happen. Soon I hope. Doesn't look like it.
 
That's rather odd. My 452 trainers are good for a half inch at 50. My 452 ultra lux is also good for 3/4 inch at 50.
With the last of my cci standard velocity I'm good for 8" 200 yard steel with any of them.

I've never had much luck with cci subsonic
 
That's rather odd. My 452 trainers are good for a half inch at 50. My 452 ultra lux is also good for 3/4 inch at 50.
With the last of my cci standard velocity I'm good for 8" 200 yard steel with any of them.

I've never had much luck with cci subsonic
My 452s were great. My 453 in 17 HMR is a laser beam. Not sure what’s up with this 457, but so far it hasn’t been super impressive.
 
My 452s were great. My 453 in 17 HMR is a laser beam. Not sure what’s up with this 457, but so far it hasn’t been super impressive.
It seems like they're hit or miss with the 22s.
The 17s are consistently good though, I think @Picher had a 22 mag either 455 or 457 that he swapped a 17 HMR and got a significant improvement in accuracy.
The 17 HMR barrel on my 457 would consistently produce half minute of angle groups at a hundred yards and that was with the like 50 to 75 rounds I put through it before I took it off.
The 22 long rifle barrel was 2 minutes at best.
I actually asked czusa if they would sell me just the action so I could put the 17 HMR barrel on but they wouldn't and I liked the 22 heavy lw better than the 17 so mine got sold.... And lost by USPS on the way to its new home It seems.....
 
Don't know if I'll ever put my .22 WMR barrel back on my CZ, unless .17 mag ammo becomes unavailable. It wasn't grouping better than 1 1/2" at 100 yards and some rounds were closer to 2". I recently gave my neighbor about 6 boxes of .22 WMR, but still have about that much left. I had tried about every kind of mag ammo around.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top