Nylon 66: Too Good to Retire

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Oct 8, 2020
Messages
2,709
I've owned two Remington Nylon 66 .22 rimfire self-loading rifles for many years. If you don't know what these are here is what they look like:

09-BDB0-A1-5-AFB-4115-8-E9-F-3-B4-D3930008-E.jpg

Introduced in the late 1950s, this was the OG "plastic fantastic" and was pivotal in changing Amercans views on polymer usage in firearms. Produced until 1989 with a million or so made, its a personal all time favorite and found use with lots of outdoorsman, children, adults, and humans in general. They were discontinued only because the tooling was worn out and Remington decided to invest in other (not as good) modernized rimfires like the unlamented Viper.

Several different variants of Remington Nylon rifles were made in various colors. Brown, black with silver accents, a low production and highly sought after “Seneca green” color, and derivatives of the gun under different names featured lever action mechanisms, a bolt action, and so on. But the rear tube fed semi automatic models were by far the most common and the standard color was “Mohawk Brown”, what both of mine are.

97-CF0-AD3-8-C90-45-FA-AF8-E-CD3-A4-BC50-F7-E.jpg

The classic autoloading Nylon 66 is IMHO one of the best .22 rimfire field guns in history. Reliable as a Singer sewing machine, feather in weight, and sleek and neat with a unique sort of retro Art Deco design going on.

Collectors value on Nylon 66s has grown a great deal in recent years. Some see these as antiques or collectors items now, safe queens all past due for retirement and beyond their useful life.

I disagree.

0026-A4-F6-4-C5-E-4818-BB8-F-DA903-E1-F61-DF.jpg

With a Nylon in my hands it just feels RIGHT. it's one of those few guns that I think are about perfect and even today no other production .22 rifle feels as nice and handy to ME as the Nylon. I can shoot the gun with uncanny accuracy and almost have a 6th sense type feeling as if I "know" I'll pop that walnut across the bank or nail that pesky varmint messing with the crops. I can hit with my Nylon better than any .22 I have ever had.

I also love the buttstock loaded tube magazine that carries a respectable 14 shots with no protruding stick magazine needed. The balance point of the rifle is right at the receiver where a magazine would get in the way. This makes the gun a tremendous joy to tote about and combined with the mere 4 lbs weight the lack of sling swivels is a non issue (though I’ve experiment with zip tie sling mods as seen above, since removed). The rear mounted tube is great from a safety standpoint as it keeps the fingers away from the muzzle (though that's not a big problem at all if you're careful on other designs).

Also the weapon can be easily single loaded by removing the magazine, dropping a round into the stock, and racking the charging handle. One minor issue with the Nylon is they're tough to scope as the sheet metal receiver cover tends to loose zero over time. Still the iron sights are very nice and I can still hit great no scope needed. For my purposes the rackish shark fin front sight with white dot and straightforward though highly visible rear notch work a peach even in the thick woods and in fairly low light conditions.

Reliability and durability of the Nylons is boss. You'll often here stories of guys even today who've never experienced a jam that wasn't ammo related. The bolt rides on the Nylon receiver which on paper sounds suspect but in reality makes for a gun that requires no lube which means no build up of excess fouling and the gun can go for many hundreds or even thousands of shots before cleaning. Stories about owners who’ve never so much as wiped out the internals are legion, with the gun still happily firing away.

F96-A3786-D950-4-A94-90-D0-C62-BCCF5787-F.jpg

The lack of lubrication made the gun a hit in arctic regions like Canada and Alaska as grease can congeal at exceptionally low temperatures and wreak havoc with the actions of other rifles. Early advertisements from Remington claimed the gun was popular with fisherman in Alaska for use against “marauding sea lions” that would go after their catch. Imagine that in an ad today!

One so-called "problem" (it actually isn’t one) that some have had with the Nylons is they can be a nightmare to get back together again IF one goes too far in the takedown process. More than one gunsmith has made a pretty penny from folks bringing in boxes of parts that used to be a complete Nylon.

However, the good news is the guns NEVER need to be disassembled beyond a basic field strip which is very simple. Because no lube is needed on the action, a quick scrub of the parts with a toothbrush and swipe of the barrel with a brush and patches will make for a clean Nylon in moments, ready to gobble more rounds. Also parts breakages are very rare on these guns, yet spares are avaliable from places like Numrich and ebay if needed.

C67-C215-E-A8-C5-4-F5-B-B59-E-F4188-FA989-A6.jpg

So in closing at least for me the Nylon 66 is one of those guns that is just TOO DARN GOOD to relegate to the goner pile. A million or better were made and despite the volatile and crazy market of today and the onslaught of time for this sadly discontinued gem, I fully intend to keep mine in the field and as far away from the cold dark safe as possible. I doubt I'll ever be able to wear my two out before I go. I've got a small kit of spare parts but chances are they probably won't be needed until long after I'm worm food.

Guys if you're in shop and see a Nylon 66 tucked away on the shelf, do yourself a favor and try one out. In my humble opinion they are an underated and nearly forgotten piece of firearms Americana thay still holds a place in the bush, at the range, or in the mountains every bit as well as it did "back in the day".

God bless and thank you for reading this!
 
Last edited:
I have one I picked up a few years ago out of opportunity and nostalgia. It has issues with reliability, which I have narrowed down to 3 possible culprits:
1- needs a new mag tube.
2- the "quality" of today's bulk 22 ammo.
3- desperate need of a thorough cleaning.
One of these days, I'm going to pout some effort into figuring out what needs to happen. In the mean time, it looks cool on the wall.
 
They are great rifles. Too bad they stopped producing them. I bought my first Apache Black over a half century ago and shot many thousands of rounds through it. It still shoots accurately and is 100% reliable.

I have a .PDF copy of the factory owners manual. If anyone wants a copy, send me an email and I can attach it to my reply.

I also have a copy of Those Plastic Remingtons, which is a history of the nylon series. I can send that as well if you want a copy.

Both are too large to upload here.
 
I "collected" almost every one of the nylon serials in a strange way. Many were just left with us when stocks broke or split. For a long while Remington would provide new stocks but stopped paying the labor to install them . Customers would just say keep it. Replacing a stock on 66s is somewhat difficult hence the labor/cost issues, I sold them all off at astounding prices as they all are collectors items. The Seneca green 66 and the lever action 76's brought the most. The lowly 10 (single shot) went for near 7 bills. (25 bucks new). Might be too soon to retire but the stocks get more brittle ever year and tough if not impossible to replace. Really liked the Mannlicher style stocks on all of them and especially the spoon bolt on the 10,11 and 12.
 
My brother had a model 12 back in the late 60's, but ended trading it in on a 870 wingmaster in 16ga. I now have that wingmaster, but wish it was the model 12.....I have numerous 870's but no model 12...dang.
 
I "collected" almost every one of the nylon serials in a strange way. Many were just left with us when stocks broke or split. For a long while Remington would provide new stocks but stopped paying the labor to install them . Customers would just say keep it. Replacing a stock on 66s is somewhat difficult hence the labor/cost issues, I sold them all off at astounding prices as they all are collectors items. The Seneca green 66 and the lever action 76's brought the most. The lowly 10 (single shot) went for near 7 bills. (25 bucks new). Might be too soon to retire but the stocks get more brittle ever year and tough if not impossible to replace. Really liked the Mannlicher style stocks on all of them and especially the spoon bolt on the 10,11 and 12.

Don’t care. I’ll shoot mine till the stocks crumble away to dust. I’m thinking my bones will be dust in quicker time than the Nylons.
 
I always liked the looks of the Remington 22 riifles. My favorite was the 552bdl known as the "speedmaster", but they cost nearly $600 .
I ended up buying a marlin model 60 which was hundreds cheaper.
 
I've had a number of these nylon rifles in various models and each has been perfectly reliable.
My only issue with these rifles is the grooved receiver. Over the years I've tried mounting scopes in various brands of rings and so far none has held zero. Apparently either Remington did a poor job machining the receiver grooves or the receiver cover shifts position or maybe a combination of the two. Every one of the dozen or so nylon rifles I've owned over the years has had that problem. I’ve been using decent quality scopes/rings so I know it’s not the scope.
If anyone knows a good solution to this problem, I would appreciate hearing it.

My latest attempt at scoping one was a 2-7 Leupold in Millet rings. It shot great for a few outings then the elevation suddenly changed 6” at 50 yd.
I was thinking about trying two sets of Millet rings or a set of the BKL double rings next.

Any thoughts?
 
I enjoy taking mine out to play with. I remember the ads when the Remington rep shot all of the wooden blocks. Just don't detail strip it for cleaning. Its a bear to get back together.
 
I have one I picked up a few years ago out of opportunity and nostalgia. It has issues with reliability, which I have narrowed down to 3 possible culprits:
1- needs a new mag tube.
2- the "quality" of today's bulk 22 ammo.
3- desperate need of a thorough cleaning.
One of these days, I'm going to pout some effort into figuring out what needs to happen. In the mean time, it looks cool on the wall.

22LRs build up soot, and dirt, from years and years of firing, with no maintenance. 99% chance you just need to carefully disassemble the cover, off the action, and remove the dirt.

Just carefully remove the outer casing off the receiver. NO further disassembly is required. Most of the dirt will simply fall out. You can shake the rest of the dirt loose, with toothpicks, Q-tips, or just blow on it. I got a large handful of accumulated dirt, from mine, apparently, about 60 years worth. Google the U-Tube videos, there's a couple which cover Nylon 66s.

I live in the sticks, and use mine regularly, for pest control. I nicknamed it "The Reaper". This thing's killed more animals than Distemper.
 
I've had a number of these nylon rifles in various models and each has been perfectly reliable.
My only issue with these rifles is the grooved receiver. Over the years I've tried mounting scopes in various brands of rings and so far none has held zero. Apparently either Remington did a poor job machining the receiver grooves or the receiver cover shifts position or maybe a combination of the two. Every one of the dozen or so nylon rifles I've owned over the years has had that problem. I’ve been using decent quality scopes/rings so I know it’s not the scope.
If anyone knows a good solution to this problem, I would appreciate hearing it.

My latest attempt at scoping one was a 2-7 Leupold in Millet rings. It shot great for a few outings then the elevation suddenly changed 6” at 50 yd.
I was thinking about trying two sets of Millet rings or a set of the BKL double rings next.

Any thoughts?
The "receiver" is not rigid with the barrel. They are grooved for a scope, but they never worked out. Every small increase/decrease in forearm pressure will move the barrel independent of the scope throwing your shots wild.
 
Don’t care. I’ll shoot mine till the stocks crumble away to dust. I’m thinking my bones will be dust in quicker time than the Nylons.
Its not the crumble but the splits and seam separations that cause the issues. IIRC some of the action parts rely on the stock for position. Also why so hard to fix when things go south. (gawd i hated working on them). If you're not concerned with looks or resale might help to tightly tape up wrist and forearm. Seen a couple keep going that way.
 
I had one when I was a young pup running a trap line. It was advertised as a lightweight and good weatherproof gun. It was that. The trigger and accuracy wasn't all that good. But at that time there was no better trap line rifle available. Nothing else even close.

They are nice.
 
Also (and before i forget due to age) There was a popular series Nylon 66 knock offs made by a company called CBC. Considered less valuable they sold cheap thru 1990s. They too suffered stock and function issues. Often seen on the "We don't fix these" list posted over the 'Smiths counter

Some info a copied from an old post somewhere:


"CBC was partly owned by Dupont and partly by the Brazilian government. Dupont also owned Remington. Dupont provided much of the ammo for Brazil and other south American countries and also plastics which is where "nylon 66" came from.

CBC made the Nylon 66 clone from the 1960s through the 1990s. It was imported to the US in the 1980s at times by FIE, Magtech, Kassnar and maybe one or two other importers when Remington stopped making the 66. The FIE guns are known at the GR8 and also "the Black Beauty", Magtech's are marked "Model Nylon 66" on the receiver cover. They were heavily marketed by K-Mart. The clones are considered good reliable guns but don't have the value of the original 66s. " Yeah Right.
 
One last note (and unless i'm wrong again) I always thought it extremely odd that in the 66 design cover is considered the "receiver". In reality the stock is more of a receiver in my mind.
 
I have one that belonged to my FIL. I took her down to the internals, cleaned and lubed. Shoots well now and I keep it in my shop for different critters that my come around...
 
Also (and before i forget due to age) There was a popular series Nylon 66 knock offs made by a company called CBC. Considered less valuable they sold cheap thru 1990s. They too suffered stock and function issues. Often seen on the "We don't fix these" list posted over the 'Smiths counter

Some info a copied from an old post somewhere:


"CBC was partly owned by Dupont and partly by the Brazilian government. Dupont also owned Remington. Dupont provided much of the ammo for Brazil and other south American countries and also plastics which is where "nylon 66" came from.

CBC made the Nylon 66 clone from the 1960s through the 1990s. It was imported to the US in the 1980s at times by FIE, Magtech, Kassnar and maybe one or two other importers when Remington stopped making the 66. The FIE guns are known at the GR8 and also "the Black Beauty", Magtech's are marked "Model Nylon 66" on the receiver cover. They were heavily marketed by K-Mart. The clones are considered good reliable guns but don't have the value of the original 66s. " Yeah Right.
We shipped a lot of .22 ammo from Remington which required authorization from The State Dept. Much of it was .22 shorts.
 
If your nylon ever starts jamming especially if after you had it apart, check the 2 receiver screws as most likely you have them too tight which will cause the receiver to bind the bolt. Back them off until the bolt runs smooth.
 
The original stock on mine snapped in half right at the pistol grip. It was a Mohawk Brown model I bought used in the 70s. It broke in about '98 when it fell out of a locker cabinet as the door was opened. Really surprised me as I had a vision of indestructibility in my mind. I found a stripped used stock in Apache Black from a guy in Arkansas, swapped it all over and it is still going good to this day. It will be here until I am not. But I like most old 22s. DCP_4575.JPG
 
I bought a 66 when they first came out while I was in high school in the 50's
It kept me in beer and gas money in college selling jack rabbits to a mink farm.
Gave my Dad a model 12 for a birthday
Son and Grandson have them now.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top