Let’s See Your 44’s!

Status
Not open for further replies.

MatrixReality

Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2020
Messages
119
Since the old western movies that had 44 revolvers starring with the actors, I’ve always been a fan of the 44 caliber, whether it was .44 BP, 44-40, 44 Russian, 44 Shofield. Then comes along the .44 SPL in the early 20th century, and the 44 Magnum in the 1950’s; along with the superb Dan Wesson 445 Supermag a bit later. Long story short, 44’s have a solid place in our history, and they are efficient. I’ve owned and shot them over the decades, and harvested game with them. I would appreciate if you would post some pics of yours!
 
I have one or two. My first .44Special was this custom Ruger by Jim Stroh.

IMG_7120e.jpg

My fanciest .44 is this Open Top .44Colt.

IMG_9871b.jpg

USFA used to make a nice one. IMHO, at the Colt SAA strength level, the .44Spl really deserves to be more popular than the .45Colt.

IMG_2980b.jpg

Pair of Cimarrons with TruIvory.

IMG_9583b.jpg

One of few that I've sold.

Uberti%20Bisley%2002.jpg

The Ruger Bisley mid-frame .44Spl is my interpretation of the #5. Just needs engraving.

IMG_7535b.jpg

Uberti Flat-top .44-40.

IMG_9261b.jpg

Uberti Callahan Target .44Mag.

IMG_9291b.jpg
 
index.php

My only .44 is this 5.5” ruger flattop blackhawk in 44 special. It’s a great shooter.
 
Truly amazing revolvers; should be included in John Taffin’s “book of the .44”! I agree with you on the .44 Spl. A VERY underrated round, that will do most anything you need it to. Hell, Elmer Keith consistently hit targets at 600yds with his hot 44SPL loads!
 
You guys know of course the the 44 of yesterday aren’t the 44 of today. 44’s back then were more 45 than 44. Today’s 44 are .429 compared to up to .457 of then. Just saying. :)
Not really. The original .44S&W American was .434" and it used heeled bullets. The Russians wanted an inside lubed bullet so it's successor, the .44 S&W Russian, was a similar case with an inside lubed bullet, which was .43. All modern .44's are direct descendants of the Russian. The Special, Magnum and SuperMag all share case and bullet dimensions with the original .44Russian. Even the 1-20" twist rate comes from the Russian. The .44Colt used a .443" because it used heeled bullets for use in percussion barrels. The .44 Henry rimfire used a .446". The most popular .44 of the old days, the Winchester .44-40 used an even smaller .427" bullet.
 
Not really. The original .44S&W American was .434" and it used heeled bullets. The Russians wanted an inside lubed bullet so it's successor, the .44 S&W Russian, was a similar case with an inside lubed bullet, which was .43. All modern .44's are direct descendants of the Russian. The Special, Magnum and SuperMag all share case and bullet dimensions with the original .44Russian. Even the 1-20" twist rate comes from the Russian. The .44Colt used a .443" because it used heeled bullets for use in percussion barrels. The .44 Henry rimfire used a .446". The most popular .44 of the old days, the Winchester .44-40 used an even smaller .427" bullet.
And this is the explanation that answers a question so many people have of why a .44 bullet is not even close enough to round to .44 on a bad math day.
 
Mine are just shooters, not works of art like some of the ones above. :)

I've been carrying the Bulldog lately.

The adjustable-sight 720 is a lot of fun to shoot and everyone who tries it enjoys it.

The SBH is my particular favorite. It's a three screw, from the very early 70's, IIRC.








 
These are the only cartridge 44’s I have, a pair of ASM Richards conversions of the Colt 1860. These are chambered for the new 44 Colt and have bores suitable for the .430 cast bullets I like.

View attachment 991752


Kevin
I do like those open top Richards . I’m so tempted to have one of my 1860’s sent out to Kirst and have them install their cylinder and the empties ejector that mounts into and replaces the loading lever instead of pinned to the barrel as the Uberti made ones are. I’ve got a 20 year old Pietta 1860 out with the Outlaw kid getting his setup done. When it comes back I might just do that. If Kirst makes their cylinder for a 2000 year made Pietta.
 
I do like those open top Richards . I’m so tempted to have one of my 1860’s sent out to Kirst and have them install their cylinder and the empties ejector that mounts into and replaces the loading lever instead of pinned to the barrel as the Uberti made ones are. I’ve got a 20 year old Pietta 1860 out with the Outlaw kid getting his setup done. When it comes back I might just do that. If Kirst makes their cylinder for a 2000 year made Pietta.


The Richards was the only revolver that had the ejector in the rammer hole. It also used a rebounding firing pin in the conversion ring and the rear sight was on the ring also. An ingenious solution to the conversion idea.


Kevin
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top