Why add caps last?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well the soldiers could've all had flasks or horn, and prime at the end of the cycle. That's an added expense and a lot more training as the soldiers have to be fastidious about their horns. Light infantry carried horns in many cases as well as cartridges.

LD
organized troops (Redcoats, French, and the standard US early infantry) were not issued powderhorns. They were issued cartridges for thier muskets. Informal militia who may have brought thier own rifles would likely bring horns but also prepared thier own paper cartridges frequently.
 
Like others have said, it lets the powder and ball in, by letting the air out.

I cap the revolver last, keeping my self behind it, and the muzzle pointed down range.
.
.
.
2nd answer:

Because Elmer Keith said so.

;)

sdrsirH.jpg

4wFFaWx.jpg

K6XcOPo.jpg
 
if you have the cap on, and drop your hammer from half cock while loading a ball, you will shoot yourself in the face. Thats the whole reason. Burning your finger and taking some small slivers from a cap blowing on seating is better than a gunshot to your face. At least with a revolver.
Rams are 180° to the barrel, so seating lines everything up. Pressing the lever hard will point the barrel directly at you.
 
Not the same as a metallic cartridge/primer set up. The primer in this instance is firmly seated and surrounded by the base of the brass (steel/aluminum) cartridge and must be physically deformed in order to create the friction/compression necessary between the primer cup and anvil to ignite the lead styphnate/barium nitrate (or whatever other specific chemical compound) primer.

If you don't physically deform the primer, then the primer does not ignite. And that deformation can only happen from one direction, within a very narrow angle of attack.

This is not, of course, to day that modern primers will never ignite under any other circumstances. However, with literally trillions of rounds of modern ammunition having been manufactured and used since their inception, such events are exceedingly rare indeed. Even rarer, perhaps to the point of non-existence, when talking about simply loading a weapon. Probably the closest would be an example of ammunition "cooking off" in a weapon that has been used so much that the receiver has become very hot...to the point of glowing, even. Outside of military weapons being used in combat, this scenario would be rare, indeed.

I'll add to this that priming after charging is never recommended in metallic because the primer can blow while seating, if it goes in crooked, debris get on the seater, you are using a case that hasn't been deprimed, or a berdan case that popped its primer.

Because C/B are capped by hand with 1/1000 the pressure of a metallic reloading press, the risk falls the other way. Also, with metallic, your not pointing the gun at yourself as you load.
 
Like others have said, it lets the powder and ball in, by letting the air out.

I cap the revolver last, keeping my self behind it, and the muzzle pointed down range.
.
.
.
2nd answer:

Because Elmer Keith said so.


If Elmer Keith said so that's good enough for me! He is my Hero...:thumbup:
 
organized troops (Redcoats, French, and the standard US early infantry) were not issued powderhorns. They were issued cartridges for thier muskets. Informal militia who may have brought thier own rifles would likely bring horns but also prepared thier own paper cartridges frequently.

I'm sorry sir but you are MUCH mistaken in this.

..., [Light Infantry to be armed thus ] "Fusil, Cartouch-Box of Balls and Flints, and a Powder horn slung over their Shoulders."

..., [the light infantry] ...., " ... use their powder horns to load, they must take particular care not to put too much powder in their pieces, & to have paper ready cut, or Tow to charge with, in proper Portions."
General Jeffery Amherst Commander and Chief British Forces in North America 1758-1760

British light infantry regiments in the F&I war WERE issued lose ball and powder horns.

You might want to reference Wolfe's Army (Men at Arms) c. 1998

Here endeth the lesson

LD
 
Last edited:
woodnbow- Yeah, If Elmer Keith said it I believe it. People called "BS" on some of his incredible pistol shots, but they have been proven possible by many Pro Shooters who have duplicated Elmer's claims. When I was a young teen most other kids had sports heros. My heros were Elmer Keith, Sketter Skelton. Jeff Cooper and Bill Jorden...:thumbup:
 
Could ramming the ball create enough compression to simulate a fire piston? I would think not, it would pop the cap off. Just a thought...
I cap last.
 
I doubt you move the loading lever fast enough or with enough pressure to get one to diesel. Still it's best to cap last, as a safety kinda thing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top