I like to explore my hunting areas all year around. Checking for signs of the game im after. Im always quiet as can be when doing so. Then when im hunting i hunt alone. When my son comes along were watch separate parts of the woods for deer. Rabbits we split off some to better our chances to kick one up. I have shot all my deer with a bow. Am i an average hunter? Im no pro lol. Just a hunter who uses common sense.
I think perhaps what the "average" hunter lacks, is a desire to be in the woods, and an earnest interest in the life there at any time other than when they get to shoot at it.
Yeah, that goodwill and sportsmans attitude you mention is the right one to have with the ones who WANT to learn to be responsible hunters, no one is degrading those. I think most here know what we are condemming and why.It’s boringly common to see these threads degrade almost instantly into the “everyone is a slob but you and me....and I’m not sure about you” bashing. Doesn’t matter if it’s hunters, guns, calibers, scopes.
I’m not qualified to judge someone else’s abilities, character, or equipment choices. And I’ve been hunting about 60 years. Other than poachers or road hunters, I welcome everyone who obeys the rules and helps support wildlife management with their license fees.
Everyone has to start somewhere. Maybe we should help the guys that haven’t had the opportunities we have. We all would have fit the derogatory descriptions posted here at some time. I don’t know that anyone is born with innate wildlife skills.
I am going turkey hunting a week from today with my best friend. I helped his son get a turkey a couple seasons ago, twenty minutes into opening day. When I started turkey hunting, I knew less than zero and struggled for five years until a neighbor was kind enough to let me hunt his land and guide me. After that, I whacked one a year maybe 8-10 years in a row
So, perhaps think about going out of your way to help someone rather than ridiculing them. I understand some will learn, some will never learn, and some don’t want to learn. But, maybe you can improve someone’s experience
It’s boringly common to see these threads degrade almost instantly into the “everyone is a slob but you and me....and I’m not sure about you” bashing. Doesn’t matter if it’s hunters, guns, calibers, scopes.
I’m not qualified to judge someone else’s abilities, character, or equipment choices. And I’ve been hunting about 60 years. Other than poachers or road hunters, I welcome everyone who obeys the rules and helps support wildlife management with their license fees.
Everyone has to start somewhere. Maybe we should help the guys that haven’t had the opportunities we have. We all would have fit the derogatory descriptions posted here at some time. I don’t know that anyone is born with innate wildlife skills.
I am going turkey hunting a week from today with my best friend. I helped his son get a turkey a couple seasons ago, twenty minutes into opening day. When I started turkey hunting, I knew less than zero and struggled for five years until a neighbor was kind enough to let me hunt his land and guide me. After that, I whacked one a year maybe 8-10 years in a row
So, perhaps think about going out of your way to help someone rather than ridiculing them. I understand some will learn, some will never learn, and some don’t want to learn. But, maybe you can improve someone’s experience
Yeah, that goodwill and sportsmans attitude you mention is the right one to have with the ones who WANT to learn to be responsible hunters, no one is degrading those. I think most here know what we are condemming and why.
I do not want that to happen. I just wanted people’s opinion on what characteristics qualify someone as an average hunter. On some of the opinions I agree. And some I don’t. And I’ll give an example of one I don’t agree with and explain why from own personal standpoint. Again, it’s just my opinion.It’s boringly common to see these threads degrade almost instantly into the “everyone is a slob but you and me....and I’m not sure about you” bashing.
On this I respectfully disagree. Being able to get close, in my opinion, actually makes you a better hunter IF you know why you were able to get so close. Yes, sometimes, dumb luck plays a role. I’ve been the beneficiary of dumb luck before.The average hunter........kills deer at under 200 yds on often under 100 yds
But you just labeled me a troll. I believe there are many member here who would disagree with your assertion of me. Up to and including a few Mods. I’ve been a very active member since 2013. Almost 4K messages and over 5.3k “likes”. The purpose of this thread was in response to another thread I was participating in. Someone said “the average hunter doesn’t benefit from xyz.” And it got me thinking about what exactly is an average hunter. So, I asked what the other members here opinion on what qualifies as average. And your opinion of the qualifications matters also. You are a member here. So you’re still welcome contribute if you’d like to.Nothing but negative crap comes from these feed the trolls threads.
LoonWulf, I couldn't click a double or triple "like" for that statement, or I would have.The "Average" of anything is going to be dictated by the mentality of the people who participate. That will change by location, cultural opinion, and any number of other things....
Buzznrose, I'd say you've been lucky. What you describe is probably the top 40% of hunters around here. Of course, I'm being generous by calling the bottom 60% "hunters", but the rest of the world lumps us all together.
@distance, I see your point, my counterpoint to clarify is that deer nation wide are mostly taken under 100 yds, why? Because the terrain that the bulk of the population are exposed to doesn't yield farther shots, on this site alone I'd wager that for every deer killed at 200+ yds, there are 3-5 more killed at sub100 and even sub50. Mostly terrain, stand placement, and population density equate to my "average" declaration. In states where legal, multiple tags are issued and deer often are taken where the opening in the trees is only 75yds long. This is not a designation of an average skill set UNTIL the hunters take same gear/mindset/skill level to new turf where wind, distances, lack of bait, lack of forage, and lack of cover require a HIGHER than average skill set.I do not want that to happen. I just wanted people’s opinion on what characteristics qualify someone as an average hunter. On some of the opinions I agree. And some I don’t. And I’ll give an example of one I don’t agree with and explain why from own personal standpoint. Again, it’s just my opinion.
On this I respectfully disagree. Being able to get close, in my opinion, actually makes you a better hunter IF you know why you were able to get so close. Yes, sometimes, dumb luck plays a role. I’ve been the beneficiary of dumb luck before.
But you just labeled me a troll. I believe there are many member here who would disagree with your assertion of me. Up to and including a few Mods. I’ve been a very active member since 2013. Almost 4K messages and over 5.3k “likes”. The purpose of this thread was in response to another thread I was participating in. Someone said “the average hunter doesn’t benefit from xyz.” And it got me thinking about what exactly is an average hunter. So, I asked what the other members here opinion on what qualifies as average. And your opinion of the qualifications matters also. You are a member here. So you’re still welcome contribute if you’d like to.
So you, like @LoonWulf tend to believe that location/terrain can play a role. Ok. I buy that. So then “average” is actually dependent on where you are and what kind of hunting you do. This I suppose, could pose difficult for us to qualify someone as below average, average, or above average.@distance, I see your point, my counterpoint to clarify is that deer nation wide are mostly taken under 100 yds, why? Because the terrain that the bulk of the population are exposed to doesn't yield farther shots, on this site alone I'd wager that for every deer killed at 200+ yds, there are 3-5 more killed at sub100 and even sub50. Mostly terrain, stand placement, and population density equate to my "average" declaration. In states where legal, multiple tags are issued and deer often are taken where the opening in the trees is only 75yds long. This is not a designation of an average skill set UNTIL the hunters take same gear/mindset/skill level to new turf where wind, distances, lack of bait, lack of forage, and lack of cover require a HIGHER than average skill set.
Eta that there is NOTHING wrong with getting close to game and that I'd expect EVERYONE here to do their best to adapt to wherever they're hunting, this viewpoint is solely from watching the people passing through looking to take that long prairie shot on a critter with zero preparation to do so (mostly they compensate drop well enough but completely misestimate how their chosen load performs in the wind and equates to quite a few wounded critters to track down).