Signs of accuracy? New Shilen barrel.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Wreck-n-Crew

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2014
Messages
1,516
Location
ohio
I was planning on waiting to do a review when I had a load developed to share what i thought about my new shilen barrel but i figured i would go ahead and share todays results.

Some details about the rifle. Savage 12FV that started as a 308. I took the stock off and set it in a stealth chasis. I hated the older stock that came on the stealth and replaced it with ( forget the brand ) an aluminium adjustable stock that you see in the photos. I then replaced the cheap scope i first had on it with a Vortex Viper HST 6-24×50. It started with 2 piece weaver mounts but then i replaced those with the EGW 20MOA one piece rail. Honestly i forget which scope rings i put on it too. It pretty much stayed that way for 500 rounds. The gun shot average about .8 moa. Some days better than others. One day a .45 groups and the next 1.1" groups. Sometimes it was me but no .5 " me.

So i decided i wanted consistency and chose to rebarrel it with a Shilen. I called Northland shooters supply and ordered a 26" shilen varmint profile in 6.5 creedmoor with an 11 degree target crown. Plus a new lug which had no variation in measuermet readable on my calipers.

Being that i chose a bad time for relaoding components i didnt get what i really wanted as far as powder, brass or bullet goes. But i needed something to start with so i gathered the things i could.

I already had Varget and its good for lighter bullets they say. I also landed some Winchester 6.5 staball and ordered it. Good i have some powder to work with but not the powder i wanted. I wanted H4350.

Bullets was another thing. Lately they are scarce but do pop up here and there. I heard that the Barnes Matchburners were not bad and since it was all i could find and they were cheap i grabbed 500 of the 140 gr Matchburners. Great i have bullets.

The Brass i wanted ranged between Peterson Lapua, and one other brand that i cant remember the name of. Not nosler, and not Norma. Im sure someone will know what brand I am forgetting the name of. But all i could find was some Hornady. Now I have not been the biggest fan of Hornady brass as it pertained to Precission components but many Competitors use it so i grabbed the last 100 on the shelf of a gun store 45 miles away. I grabbed them and continued on to 2 other gun stores that were stripped bare of anything i could use.

I ordered a set of Forster BR dies. A pilot for the RCBS neck turning tool and set about making some loads.

First things first, brass prep. Checked the runout. Not bad actually. But i had some that were a little too far out and just turned the necks on them all. Got runout down withing +/- a thousandth. Annealed them, primed them and loaded for saterlee even though i know new brass will likely changed once i fireform and load them as they will be for their life span. I felt no need to waste good powder,primers, bullets, and barrel life without getting something out of it.

I found the throat to be much longer than the magazine length so i just decided on a start length of 2.8". That is .1" longer than barnes length but plenty of bullet was in the case and i started there until i find a good load before adjusting.

I Just finished the loads with varget and was watching my calendar and hoping the 6.5 Staball powder would show up and it did today. Perfect timing.


I guess depending on what cartridge and powder range your afforded some people load differently using the saterlee method but i stuck with small change increments of .2gr for the win.

I loaded up 3 rounds in 3 used cases i had for barrel break in and sighting. Figuring i could contue any barrel break in on the Varget loads.

Since the varget got the first loadings while i waited on the other powder i loaded it from low to high with the data i had started out at 32gr and ending with 35.8 gr for a total of 16 loads.

When I got the 6.5 Stabill powder i felt i might have better hopes with this powder than Varget. Also i was not wanting to waste too many bullets and primers so i started in the middle of the data ( I know you should not do this, technically speaking) and loaded up 11 loads ranging from 42-44gr in .2 gr increments.

I packed up the gun cleaning kit, the sweets for the copper and break in ckeaning, and the chrono and headed out.

I wasnt mindful of the daylight and the sun this time of year goes down behind the shooting bench early enough to cast a shadow on the Chrono. Its a prochrono digital and it works flawless with light. Kicking myself for not ordering lights for it sooner i soon realized that i couldnt capture any data of value. However other things went real well.

Trying to bore sight a gun in a hurry i found myself way off on the firdt shot. So much i though i missed the whole target. It took 5 shots to get pretty close to the dot because i am an idiot and turned the turrets the wrong way.

By this time i am 5 shots and 2 cleanings in. And very little blue on the cleaning patch. Break in did not sway my method. I just shot the groups at they came.

I did split the varget into 2 groups. One 6 shot and one 10. Including the sighter that got me close.

The 6 Shot group,well i pulled one and still came out well. About .75" Keeping in mind these were all different loads at .2 gr increments in a range from 32.6-33.6 gr for a spread of 1.2 gr i dont think it was bad. If i removed the one i pulled the group shrank to about .65"

Moving on to the second half of the Varget loads i figured i would move the chrono and maybe catch data. Changed strings too. No dice.
But as you see in the second picture i still managed a nice 6 hole group seperate from the first 4 at about .5" with a spread of 1.2gr in charge weight.

A pattern is emerging here. When the node moves, it all moves at once it seams? Well the final loads of Staball 6.5 powder seem to do the same thing.

In this 11 shot string i dropped a nice 4 shot group less than .5" before the shift. The next 6 shots measure less than .5"too. Nice little cluster on the right of the final target pic. The last shot opened it up to a little over .7" as you can see.


Maybe i am reading more into this but it seems my hodge podge batch of powder and bullets didnt do too bad with the new Hornady brass and Fed 210M primers. What do you think? Do you think some good Peterson or Lapua brass with a better bullet and some H4350 and i might see a half minute average maybe better?

Although if i dont get the low standsrd deviations i will change something. After all small groups at 100 dont do the same at 1,000 if the numbers are not there.

As a side note i am not planning on using varget as my powder. Not that it did bad but i want a little more velocity. The 6.5 Staball powder may be as good as H4350 in this barrel with the right components. Maybe not.

A day i thought would be a bad day for testing was still enjoyable. Everything felt good. Including the weather.
 

Attachments

  • 20210418_201446.jpg
    20210418_201446.jpg
    76.1 KB · Views: 80
  • 20210418_201425.jpg
    20210418_201425.jpg
    79.1 KB · Views: 81
  • 20210418_201330.jpg
    20210418_201330.jpg
    88 KB · Views: 80
  • 20210418_163455.jpg
    20210418_163455.jpg
    139.1 KB · Views: 83
  • 20210418_163451.jpg
    20210418_163451.jpg
    123.3 KB · Views: 82
  • 20210416_141459.jpg
    20210416_141459.jpg
    74.4 KB · Views: 85
Nice write up and nice shooting. What velocities were you getting?
Thanks. I only managed 8 shots that registered. Ranging from 2500's with the varget starting load to a little over 2900 with one of the 6.5 Staball loads. Which ones i have no idea. Couldnt get my phone to connect to the chrono and the range was busy.

Not sure how accurate the readings were either. Lack of light sometimes affects that kind of chronograph. Something i will fix for the next time im out with a lighting system.
 
Last edited:
On test number one ( varget powder) in what order were those shots?
On target two, same question ?
From these two course charge tests have you identified a node or area you would chose to fine tune?
Without the chrono data it would be hard to tell but i am pretty sure there are a few in there.

As far as the order i cant say exactly. Ither than the pulled shot in the first group.

I was making an effort at accuracy but i was hopefully relying on the chrono data to help hone in on the nodes. Unfortunately that was a failure. Lol

If i had my guess though it would be on the upper end of the Staball 6.5 load for the 3rd pic. Somewhere around the 42-42.6gr range.

With the first pic and the varget i feel there is a node there which are on the low end and with the start charge but where i couldnt say.

With the second pic and higher loads of varget my guess is on the upper end within those last 6 charges which range from 34.8-35.8.

No real signs of pressure other than maybe some slight burs in the primer stikes with the Staball.6.5 loads. Not really flat for federal primers, edges stil mostly round.
 
My relatively limited experience with custom or upper end barrel's has been that one hundred yards makes for a cluster of shots mostly unidentifiable as the center blows out, moving to 200 yards helps spread out the shots .
A couple things I do are one- color the bullets with a Sharpie red blue green black yellow etc. to help identity shots without a spotter scope or a assistant, two I use two or three of each charge and one point of aim. I can test out to 1 thousand yards if need be.
I always use wind flags.
Thx for posting and please report back your further testing.
 

Attachments

  • 20201216_115115.jpg
    20201216_115115.jpg
    91 KB · Views: 13
Last edited:
My relatively limited experience with custom or upper end barrel's has been that one hundred yards makes for a cluster of shots mostly unidentifiable as the center blows out, moving to 200 yards helps spread out the shots .
A couple things I do are one- color the bullets with a Sharpie red blue green black yellow etc. to help identity shots without a spotter scope or a assistant, two I use two or three of each charge and one point of aim. I can test out to 1 thousand yards if need be.
I always use wind flags.
Thx posting and please report back your further testing.
The sharpie seems like a great idea. Much cheaper than a target cam. Which i have thought about.

It makes since about those longer distances and with an inreliable chronograph on the day you needed it doesnt make things better. At least with the data i could have had some narrowing down of nodes with some confidence.

At the moment i am restrained to 100 for testing purposes most of the time. One other place requires me to schedule a time for a buddy to be there and that can be a little tough. But i can test out pSt 500yds there.

My plan for long range is a little bit of a drive for me and i hope to have something somewhat proven in load developement before i make the trip.

Its a little bit of a tough situation for me. I would love to have a better place but they are slim pickings where i live and i dont know the right people yet.

Appreciate the tips. Ill share some results when i can add some data with them.

I was one of the doubters of the newer saterlee method. I just thought it was a lottle too easy that someone would have figured out by now. To easy made me uneasy.

But i guess enough people have proven that you can shoot less shots and find a node much quicker. The idea that velocity nodes could be found with single shots for each charge weight didnt seem reliable.

But it does depend on the reloader to do thigs right. If not its not worth trying. I guess the same can be said for the OCW method. If you dont get one or 2 right in a 5 shot string you might question the validity of the load. With good reason.
 
if its a Shilen select match I don't have one that wont shoot 1/4" are better. Did you bed the action into the stock?
 
bring binoculars next time.

interesting test,

murf
I had binoculars but rembering shot order was not going to hapen. They were piled in too close together to keep track.

The shots werent hard to see either at 100 yarss with 24x.

Spotting scopes work better than either. Just havent bought one yet
 
Bedding the recoil lug and and rear tang will help
On an aluminum Chasis? I guess you could but most never have a need too unless the action was not made for the chasis.

MDT does s a fairly nice job on their Chasis too. So far i see no good reason to bed it. No odd fliers or POI shifts when everything is buttoned down right. I guess if there was a good reason to i would do it in a heart beat.
 
Your action and the chassis are not machined for a perfect fit so it would improve I bedded one in a chassis for a guy on the local swat team (Remington action) he saw 1/4" improvement with factory ammo. If what you are thinking was right there would be no reason to bed a bolt gun in a stock with a bedding block since its made for that action. Making it a perfect fit will improve accuracy.
 
Your action and the chassis are not machined for a perfect fit so it would improve I bedded one in a chassis for a guy on the local swat team (Remington action) he saw 1/4" improvement with factory ammo. If what you are thinking was right there would be no reason to bed a bolt gun in a stock with a bedding block since its made for that action. Making it a perfect fit will improve accuracy.


It’s worth a shot
 
I agree with the two posts above . I would at least do the recoil lug and skim bed it . Bedding will assure 100 percent contact between the receiver and the chassis . Generous recoil lug areas need bedding also . You may get the rifle to shoot well enough for your likes, but there is a good chance you are missing some without locking that reciever in . I have seen plenty of aluminum smears on receivers which shows every high spot on a blued/matte receiver. Harmonics is directly linked to bedding, that is one variable you can control to a degree.
 
Last edited:
On an aluminum Chasis? I guess you could but most never have a need too unless the action was not made for the chasis.

MDT does s a fairly nice job on their Chasis too. So far i see no good reason to bed it. No odd fliers or POI shifts when everything is buttoned down right. I guess if there was a good reason to i would do it in a heart beat.
For me it would depend on how well it shoots now. A bit of load development is higher on the list then bedding.

Combustion..
Harmonics..
Ballistics..
J
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top