Aftermarket Upgrades for AR-15 (Legal in Oregon)

Status
Not open for further replies.
So what you are saying is that you have no real world experience other then the range and shooting competition.
Have you ever tried shooting an AR with a nice scope with a Milspec trigger and then try the same rifle with a better trigger?
But like I said before, different people will prefer different upgrades.
I have tried, and found a good trigger to be the biggest deal maker in the shooting world, all else being equal. Group size drops about 2/3rds. I can shoot far better, and far faster with A2 Irons (btw, if you have them, the KNS small post with the ball on the end is a huge upgrade itself for $8.), I do NOT have astigmatism, but still cant use the dot as effectively. Its an experience thing, 50k through iron sights vs a few thousand through red dots. I can outshoot in terms of time and accuracy most people I know with dots -in daylight. that advantage drops quick with light. But really, a red dot is nice, especially if your new to shooting, but don't overlook upgrading irons, and as most agree here, Triggers are what will make your shooting improve most. Even something like a spring kits, adjuster, or just the rag in the receiver and screw driver on the hammer method.

Not a direct reply to Gunny, but a overall agreement for the OP.
 
obsoletely correct. I've not had an issue with the springs on mine being too light. Even on rimfires, but have heard that can be an issue with some spring kits.
I tried one of the name brand spring kits, years ago. The kit came with a warning about light strikes with heave primers. I did have a few misfires with some surplus ammo.
I like the Hiperfire triggers because they are engineered to have a heavier hammer fall and still give you a great trigger pull.
 
Also. By PM you mean postmark correct?
I sent you a PM. It should be in your inbox. But I guess your still figuring out your way around the forum.
Here’s a pic of the three types of extra flash hiders I have, other then the standard A2, which I have about 20 of.
The one on the left is a muzzle brake. The center one is a 4 prong flash hider, and the one on the right is a YHM Phantom flash hider.
Pick the one you want, and PM me your shipping info and I’ll send it to you.
00765F67-D29E-4284-A22D-DEA5BF102401.jpeg EF7D2BB2-C5DC-4D62-B0E0-FAA1B77D6CCA.jpeg
 
Interesting claims about a trigger upgrade being the best shooter mod. I understand the US Army thinks its an optic red dot sight.
 
Interesting debate.

I look at it like this. An optic doest make the rifle perform any better than it already does. It really makes it easier for the shooter to perform better. An upgraded trigger or other upgrades to the rifle will make the rifle perform differently.

You need to evaluate your own skill set and what the rifle is capable of as is then make changes.

When I set up a "go to" or HD rifle for myself (or friends and family) I consider changers in this order:

Optic and back up sights
Sling
Trigger
Handguard
Flashlight
Butt stock
Grip and trigger guard
CH

Depending on the rifle and shooter it may not be in that order every single time as some may have been ordered or built with the trigger or free float hand guard I already like.

I usually keep bird cage flash hiders now unless I want to mount a suppressor or just want a different look.

Best thing is practice, practice, practice though. Take a class or two. There should be a range close by that offers some type of training. You don't have to go to super expensive shooting courses to learn the basics.
 
I sent you a PM. It should be in your inbox. But I guess your still figuring out your way around the forum.
Here’s a pic of the three types of extra flash hiders I have, other then the standard A2, which I have about 20 of.
The one on the left is a muzzle brake. The center one is a 4 prong flash hider, and the one on the right is a YHM Phantom flash hider.
Pick the one you want, and PM me your shipping info and I’ll send it to you.
View attachment 1001841 View attachment 1001842

Interesting flash hiders, I still have the a2 on mine.

Wife and I went to our friends place yesterday hubbardsville NY.
Last year I persuaded him up shoot my Ar, he liked it do much he wanted to get one too, but he being a retired army sgt wanted an a2 version. He's got a psa fn a2 upper with complete lower build kit comming in this week. It took a while for him to find the upper available.
 
Interesting debate.

I look at it like this. An optic doest make the rifle perform any better than it already does. It really makes it easier for the shooter to perform better. An upgraded trigger or other upgrades to the rifle will make the rifle perform differently.

You need to evaluate your own skill set and what the rifle is capable of as is then make changes.

When I set up a "go to" or HD rifle for myself (or friends and family) I consider changers in this order:

Optic and back up sights
Sling
Trigger
Handguard
Flashlight
Butt stock
Grip and trigger guard
CH

Depending on the rifle and shooter it may not be in that order every single time as some may have been ordered or built with the trigger or free float hand guard I already like.

I usually keep bird cage flash hiders now unless I want to mount a suppressor or just want a different look.

Best thing is practice, practice, practice though. Take a class or two. There should be a range close by that offers some type of training. You don't have to go to super expensive shooting courses to learn the basics.
You are correct in the difference of an upgrade that improves the performance of the rifle and one that improves the shooter.
I have a friend that hates red dot sights, and another that doesn’t care for scopes.
Interesting claims about a trigger upgrade being the best shooter mod. I understand the US Army thinks its an optic red dot sight.
That’s because the military does not want to spend the extra money on parts like triggers on standard issued weapons. They fill that in a high street environment, such as combat, a red dot sight. But it did take years for them to move to electronic sights on standard issued weapons.
 
So what you are saying is that you have no real world experience other then the range and shooting competition.
Have you ever tried shooting an AR with a nice scope with a Milspec trigger and then try the same rifle with a better trigger?
But like I said before, different people will prefer different upgrades.

Sure, it's easier to shoot sub MOA groups with a 8oz trigger than a 6lb trigger, but with proper form, you can still shoot sub-MOA with a 6lb trigger. (and frankly, too many 'shooters' use an inappropriately light trigger to mask very poor fundamentals) however, the OP said he's looking for CQC, not benchrest. And since he's not going to put a nice scope on a CQC carbine, it's not like he's really in a position to take advantage of benchrest groups anyways.

For CQC, all a nice trigger really lets you do is get faster split times and make it a little easier to keep the second round in the A zone. A red dot on the other hand, let's you get on target faster (faster transitions), and keep a target focus (situational awareness) instead of a front sight focus with irons. I'd take faster first round on target over faster split times any day.

I think the triggers you recommended (I have a few of them) are solid choices for CQC on a budget.

I can't tell what you meant by this sentence "They fill that in a high street environment, such as combat, a red dot sight." But it's clear the military believes red dot sights are a priority over triggers because they issue red dots. Do they issue ALG or ACT triggers? I'd be surprised if most units even allow aftermarket triggers.

I have a few nice scopes, like a NF ATACR 1-8x, Swaro z6i 1-6x, Vortex gen2 HD 1-6x, USO 1-8x on various social and gamer AR15s.
And I have plenty of high end triggers, like geissele hi-speed national match, x-treme (old cg-jackson), etc and a bunch of mid-range stuff like geissele SD3G, and most of other geiselles, rock river triggers, larue and more, and then a bunch of the budget stuff, like ALG, and regular mil-spec, and mil-spec with coatings. and excellent triggers in bolt guns too; currently running trigger tech diamonds.

so yes, to answer your question, I have shot an AR with a nice scope and a milspec trigger and then the same rifle with a better trigger. Heck, I'll do you one better. I got 4 leg points in the M16 intro EIC match at camp perry, where everyone uses a rack grade, worn out, actual issued M16 with an as issued trigger. similar course, including standing, offhand, at 200 yards, shooting at a 3" x ring and 6" ten ring, followed by shooting the P100 and NTI the following days with my own rifle with fancy trigger (4.5lb minimum weight).

the funny thing is I'm kind of a trigger snob, and am pretty opinionated about what makes a good trigger and what doesn't. i really like nice triggers, and i put pretty much the nicest triggers there are in my ARs that i really intend to use. But if I was on a budget, a trigger wouldn't be in my top 5 upgrades

you're always going to have exceptions to the rule, especially on the internet, where someone will always come along and tell you they don't like pie, or put a million miles on their yugo, or their jennings/bryco never malfunctioned, or they shoot better with irons than optics. ok sure. but that's doesn't change the rule that red dots are such a game changer, that we put people in separate classes when they compete, but that triggers are a very slight improvement, and a great many of them give up reliability (though not the ones you mentioned imho).

here's an example. i just searched google for "tactical carbine match scores" and this link to a monthly club 2gun match was on the first page. https://centralcarolinagunclub.wildapricot.org/page-1788404 I had to go back 5 months to January to find an IRON SIGHTS division shooter who's time would have placed him in the top 20 of optics division.

Look at the data for fastest optics and fastest iron shooters
May 172.9 vs 317.27
Apr 216.38 vs 430.39
Mar 145.67 vs 335.96
Jan 198.38 vs 394.81
Dec 137.09 vs 185.23
Nov 176.97 vs 314.76
Aug 158.7 vs 211.79
Jul 154.49 vs 330.88
Jun 150.02 vs 267.93

that's a year of matches. and over that year the fastest and most accurate optics guy was
46%
50%
57%
50%
26%
44%
25%
53%
44%
faster and more accurate than the fastest and most accurate irons guy. best case for the irons guy, he gets beat by 25%, but often over 50%.

i reckon you'll have a hard time finding anyone who tracks times for stock triggers separately from high dollar triggers. that should be a big clue that nobody who actually shoots thinks they make that big of a difference for HD style carbines.
 
Interesting flash hiders, I still have the a2 on mine.

Wife and I went to our friends place yesterday hubbardsville NY.
Last year I persuaded him up shoot my Ar, he liked it do much he wanted to get one too, but he being a retired army sgt wanted an a2 version. He's got a psa fn a2 upper with complete lower build kit comming in this week. It took a while for him to find the upper available.

Yeah with all the talk of regulation parts and kits are flying off the rack. It took me a while to get my parts kit but I lucked out on finding my lower
 
Yeah with all the talk of regulation parts and kits are flying off the rack. It took me a while to get my parts kit but I lucked out on finding my lower

He's had the lower for a while, but that took a few weeks to get as well. At the time the lowers were the hens teeth.
 
That’s because the military does not want to spend the extra money on parts like triggers on standard issued weapons.
Also, given that military weapons are often cleaned in batches of dozens at a time, unless the triggers were a drop-in single part 100% resistant to GI cleaners, then they are less-good overall.

An optic will pull off as a unit. Triggers come out as bits.
 
Sure, it's easier to shoot sub MOA groups with a 8oz trigger than a 6lb trigger, but with proper form, you can still shoot sub-MOA with a 6lb trigger. (and frankly, too many 'shooters' use an inappropriately light trigger to mask very poor fundamentals) however, the OP said he's looking for CQC, not benchrest. And since he's not going to put a nice scope on a CQC carbine, it's not like he's really in a position to take advantage of benchrest groups anyways.

For CQC, all a nice trigger really lets you do is get faster split times and make it a little easier to keep the second round in the A zone. A red dot on the other hand, let's you get on target faster (faster transitions), and keep a target focus (situational awareness) instead of a front sight focus with irons. I'd take faster first round on target over faster split times any day.

I think the triggers you recommended (I have a few of them) are solid choices for CQC on a budget.

I can't tell what you meant by this sentence "They fill that in a high street environment, such as combat, a red dot sight." But it's clear the military believes red dot sights are a priority over triggers because they issue red dots. Do they issue ALG or ACT triggers? I'd be surprised if most units even allow aftermarket triggers.

I have a few nice scopes, like a NF ATACR 1-8x, Swaro z6i 1-6x, Vortex gen2 HD 1-6x, USO 1-8x on various social and gamer AR15s.
And I have plenty of high end triggers, like geissele hi-speed national match, x-treme (old cg-jackson), etc and a bunch of mid-range stuff like geissele SD3G, and most of other geiselles, rock river triggers, larue and more, and then a bunch of the budget stuff, like ALG, and regular mil-spec, and mil-spec with coatings. and excellent triggers in bolt guns too; currently running trigger tech diamonds.

so yes, to answer your question, I have shot an AR with a nice scope and a milspec trigger and then the same rifle with a better trigger. Heck, I'll do you one better. I got 4 leg points in the M16 intro EIC match at camp perry, where everyone uses a rack grade, worn out, actual issued M16 with an as issued trigger. similar course, including standing, offhand, at 200 yards, shooting at a 3" x ring and 6" ten ring, followed by shooting the P100 and NTI the following days with my own rifle with fancy trigger (4.5lb minimum weight).

the funny thing is I'm kind of a trigger snob, and am pretty opinionated about what makes a good trigger and what doesn't. i really like nice triggers, and i put pretty much the nicest triggers there are in my ARs that i really intend to use. But if I was on a budget, a trigger wouldn't be in my top 5 upgrades

you're always going to have exceptions to the rule, especially on the internet, where someone will always come along and tell you they don't like pie, or put a million miles on their yugo, or their jennings/bryco never malfunctioned, or they shoot better with irons than optics. ok sure. but that's doesn't change the rule that red dots are such a game changer, that we put people in separate classes when they compete, but that triggers are a very slight improvement, and a great many of them give up reliability (though not the ones you mentioned imho).

here's an example. i just searched google for "tactical carbine match scores" and this link to a monthly club 2gun match was on the first page. https://centralcarolinagunclub.wildapricot.org/page-1788404 I had to go back 5 months to January to find an IRON SIGHTS division shooter who's time would have placed him in the top 20 of optics division.

Look at the data for fastest optics and fastest iron shooters
May 172.9 vs 317.27
Apr 216.38 vs 430.39
Mar 145.67 vs 335.96
Jan 198.38 vs 394.81
Dec 137.09 vs 185.23
Nov 176.97 vs 314.76
Aug 158.7 vs 211.79
Jul 154.49 vs 330.88
Jun 150.02 vs 267.93

that's a year of matches. and over that year the fastest and most accurate optics guy was
46%
50%
57%
50%
26%
44%
25%
53%
44%
faster and more accurate than the fastest and most accurate irons guy. best case for the irons guy, he gets beat by 25%, but often over 50%.

i reckon you'll have a hard time finding anyone who tracks times for stock triggers separately from high dollar triggers. that should be a big clue that nobody who actually shoots thinks they make that big of a difference for HD style carbines.
I covered the part about the military using electronic sights and not upgrading triggers on standard issued weapons in post #32.
Weapons and equipment in the military see a lot of abuses, some physical and some environmental. And when they are used in combat the abuse leaves are higher. This is why the military uses sights that cost more the the average AR15.
Now if you go back and read my post, I never recommend a light weight trigger. You are correct that the light weight 3 lbs and less triggers are for bench rest shooters or target shooters. They have no place on a duty weapon.
But like I said before, not everyone will agree on what is the best upgrade. But if you were to do a poll on what would be the best upgrade, I believe that a better trigger would come out ahead of a red dot.
My SBR has an updated duty trigger and a The Trijicon MRO sight. This gun is a tool for home defense. I have other red dots on several guns and like them very much, but all got a trigger upgrade before a red dot are were put on at the same time the rifle was built.
I know some people that can’t shoot good with iron sights. Some are because they were never trained or just hardly used them. Some can’t see good enough anymore to use them. I can still use iron sights pretty good, but my eyes are not what they used to be.
There are some criminals that are upgrading their ARs with electronic sights. But the guy that had this one was doing it wrong.:rofl:
03940595-B60D-4E91-8122-0C9C264C39C0.jpeg 73481288-579B-44C8-B779-F2BE1D61A577.jpeg E08AA922-8162-4948-8FD7-3BE7470F025D.jpeg 2ADC5C58-26BE-45D5-AF71-DF15602F9890.jpeg
 
Looks likes mounted a flashlight as a sight

I covered the part about the military using electronic sights and not upgrading triggers on standard issued weapons in post #32.
Weapons and equipment in the military see a lot of abuses, some physical and some environmental. And when they are used in combat the abuse leaves are higher. This is why the military uses sights that cost more the the average AR15.
Now if you go back and read my post, I never recommend a light weight trigger. You are correct that the light weight 3 lbs and less triggers are for bench rest shooters or target shooters. They have no place on a duty weapon.
But like I said before, not everyone will agree on what is the best upgrade. But if you were to do a poll on what would be the best upgrade, I believe that a better trigger would come out ahead of a red dot.
My SBR has an updated duty trigger and a The Trijicon MRO sight. This gun is a tool for home defense. I have other red dots on several guns and like them very much, but all got a trigger upgrade before a red dot are were put on at the same time the rifle was built.
I know some people that can’t shoot good with iron sights. Some are because they were never trained or just hardly used them. Some can’t see good enough anymore to use them. I can still use iron sights pretty good, but my eyes are not what they used to be.
There are some criminals that are upgrading their ARs with electronic sights. But the guy that had this one was doing it wrong.:rofl:
View attachment 1002025 View attachment 1002026 View attachment 1002027 View attachment 1002028

Don't have to be bright to commit crimes. That is a serious crime against that AR.
 
I'm considering a drop in quad rail by Troy 7". Not sure about other add ons. A vertical foregrip and maybe a weapon light.
 
But like I said before, not everyone will agree on what is the best upgrade. But if you were to do a poll on what would be the best upgrade, I believe that a better trigger would come out ahead of a red dot.

happy to oblige. i switched forums so this discussion wouldn't contaminate the poll. currently at 101 votes in the poll so far.
https://www.ar15.com/forums/General/Which-one-upgrade-would-you-pick-for-your-HD-AR15/5-2457596/

interestingly, many responses said a weapon light would be their first upgrade. I generally agree, but I never think about that because i spend so much time with NV, i just never think about white lights.
 
209 votes... 87% favor optic. 8% favor trigger.
 
Last edited:
209 votes... 87% favor optic. 8% favor trigger.

Poll make prefect sense, especially when we consider the fact that the majority of carbines actually used for CQB have stock mil grade triggers.

Optic = speed
White light for TGT ID which in HD is paramount
Sling so you can do things with your hands and retain the weapon

Which is pretty much what I said in my earlier post. We tend as a community to recommend what we like, but it's not necessarily what the OP "needs". Again, IF serious about setting up a carbine for SD/HD, take a class and sort out what's "needed".

For instance VFGs look cool, but have become passé, hardly ever see one in either a class or 3Gun match. When I do it's generally new guys. The FWD "thumb over stock" grip to drive the gun between TGTs and better mitigate recoil has become "the" way. In matches the LPVO dominates, but that's due to the distance targets (not an HD type requirement), still the majority of tgts are engaged at 1X which = RDS capability.

Basic AR15 (Colt LE6920) set up for HD:

k0qDWGJl.jpg

Tricked out 3Gun rig:

cEv0MOsl.jpg
 
Every time I go to the range and see someone shooting an AR, I very seldom see a weapon light mounted on one. It my be that they leave their lights at home, not sure.
For those that do like a weapon light, remember this. Brighter is not better indoors. A light that is to bright will reflect off light color wall and make it hard for you to see.
 
209 votes... 87% favor optic. 8% favor trigger.

Umm...I like pie.

What I see are two knowledgeable people (taliv and Gunny) who both set up the entire rifle. If the polling asked “would you choose to upgrade optic AND trigger” I’d guess fewer would like the single options or pie for that matter.

Because many of the ARs I’ve helped assemble were for my kids, I wanted them to understand the very basics first. They are rocking ALG ACT, QMS, PSA, and a Jard. All single-stage, nothing under 4 lbs, and they know smaller groups require some concentration. LPVOs on all but 1 which got a RDS and they trade off for practice, subbing my irons only in as well.

If I were pressed for a single upgrade, RDS. Second for me stock, then handguard, then trigger. Always a light first for home defense though.
 
the pie responses were largely due to only two choices neither of which was the light.
 
on a bit of a budget:
I like the 50 cent ar trigger job,
a sub $130 free float handguard, if I had to save money, I would go cheap here. you can get them for $50 all day long. but the mose expensive ones are nicer, with the sharp edges knocked off.
new grip (i like the magpul k2)
a fairly cheap adjustable gas block.
Then I'd put on a fairly low powered scope in a utg pro accusync mount. something in the 1-6 or 2-7 power range and $150-250.

as a lefty, my first priorities are a raptor charging handle and a left handed safety.
 
The two most important things I put on for a rifle that might be used for "social work" is a good sighting setup and a light. You can get very used to a mil-spec trigger. I used one for years and it has saved my life in firefights. If you have the budget to upgrade the trigger later, that would be my recommendation. If upgrading the trigger is your plan, set aside more money for ammo to get used to a better trigger.

Sighting setup is what I copy from my military days. The best quality optic I can afford at the time and backup iron sights. I have rarely seen quality optics fail, outside of battery running out. A good quality optic can be beat, pounded, and in general abused while still working fine. But when an optic does fail, it fails hard. So I believe in backup sights. If you are focusing on weight and budget savings, go with just good iron sights. Shooting inside 100 yards is easy enough to do anyway.

Light is pretty self explanatory. One of the rules is know your target and what is beyond it. If you can't see your target you can't identify it. Good light in a good mount, call it done. If your rifle setup is being considered for home defense, keep the light power in the 500-1000 lumen range. Too many lumens inside will take away your night vision as well as the BG. And less lumens is easier on the wallet usually. Take some low light shooting classes that focus on how to use a light to your advantage while shooting in the dark.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top