What is wrong with picture?

Status
Not open for further replies.

tark

Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2013
Messages
5,162
Location
atkinson, ill
Here's my M-1 with its bayonet... Wait a minute! What is wrong with this picture? The other day I had my Garand out of the safe. I happened to glance at my type 99 Arisaka bayonet and I said, "What the hell, let's try it." It slid right on and locked in place! With almost no looseness or rattling. To say I was surprised would be the understatement of the century.

Do any of you guys have a Garand and an Arisaka bayonet? Do they fit together?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7328[1].JPG
    IMG_7328[1].JPG
    194.7 KB · Views: 232
  • IMG_7330[1].JPG
    IMG_7330[1].JPG
    216.6 KB · Views: 219
  • IMG_7329[1].JPG
    IMG_7329[1].JPG
    205.8 KB · Views: 218
Last edited:
They look like they're made for each other.

you really need to clean your carpet, though ... your cat will appreciate it. :)
 
Man, that Arisaka bayonet is a sword! :thumbup:

Ive never heard anyone say or write about using a Japanese bayonet on an American rifle in battle... but it sure looks like it could be done :).

Stay safe.
 
Notice that the Arisaka bayonet is seating on the thin part of the Garand barrel, ahead of the gas cylinder lock. That means that the Krag / Springfield / Garand bayonets, that seat on the thicker part that includes the gas cylinder lock, would be a loose fit on the Arisaka rifle. So this is one-way interchangeability. But seriously, why would anyone want to mount an Arisaka bayonet on a Garand (other than just to see if it could be done)?
 
that makes me wonder if anyone in the war ever "requisitioned" any arisaka bayonets. It certainly is more physically impressive then the m1 bayonet.
Actually, its blade is not as long as it looks It is 18" about as long as a 1905 bayonet. The angle of the camera makes it look longer than it is. l
 
Nor really germane to the thread, but a US M1905 bayonet fits and locks up tight on a Swiss K31, although the muzzle ring is a little loose on the barrel.
Not surprising, because the U.S. Krag bayonet was a copy of the Swiss bayonet, and the following Springfield and Garand bayonets (except for the M5) continued the Krag attachment points.
 
Not surprising, because the U.S. Krag bayonet was a copy of the Swiss bayonet, and the following Springfield and Garand bayonets (except for the M5) continued the Krag attachment points.
That explains why my Garand bayonet fits on my Krag. Thanks for the info. :)
 
There's lots of strange interoperability in gun-related things, even between enemy countries. For example, a Browning machine gun will fit on a Vickers mount, and vice versa. (Vickers mounts were actually issued for Browning guns in WW1.) Where it gets wild is that those Browning or Vickers guns will fit on a German Maxim sled mount, or even on a Russian Sokolov wheeled mount! The reason is that all of these guns shared a common historical development -- they were all more or less derived from Maxim's original invention. No matter who produced the guns, they never changed the spacing or diameter of the mounting pins.

Try putting an M2HB .50 cal. on a Sokolov mount with the gunner's shield.... it looks like a small artillery piece!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top