Also, I know of NO STUDY that has shown that a semi-wadcutter will do more damage than a good hollow point
I don't think any such specific studies exist either but I have found these to be extremely informative, if you are capable of having an open mind, you might read through both studies and consider what they're saying about wave fronts in living tissue and fragmenting versus expanding projectiles. According to their work at West Point, a WFN lead bullet moving fast enough to penetrate to the vitals doesn't have to produce a permanent wound channel to cause trauma and shock. Anyway, if anybody would care to read published, critical research which has actually been through peer review, here you go. Don't blame me if it gores your ox.
"Ballistic pressure wave contributions to rapid incapacitation in the Strasbourg goat tests"
Michael Courtney, PhD, Ballistics Testing Group; Amy Courtney, PhD, Department of Physics, United States Military Academy, West Point, NY
Abstract: This article presents empirical models for the relationship between peak ballistic pressure wave magnitude and
incapacitation times in the Strasbourg goat test data. Using a model with the expected limiting behavior at large
and small pressure wave magnitudes, the average incapacitation times are highly correlated (R = 0.91) with
peak pressure wave magnitude. The cumulative incapacitation probability as a function of time reveals both
fast (t < 5 s) and slow (t > 5 s) incapacitation mechanisms. The fast incapacitation mechanism can be
accurately modeled as a function of peak pressure wave magnitude. The slow incapacitation mechanism is
presumably due to blood loss via damaged vascular tissue.
Originally submitted 13 December 2006. Revised version submitted 1 August 2007.
Discussion Section B. Implications for Bullet Design
"The trend in bullet design over the last decade has drifted toward bullets with little fragmentation and a higher percentage of retained mass. Bullets that both fragment and meet minimum penetration requirements create larger pressure wave magnitudes and offer improved incapacitation potential [COC06b]. In addition to moving toward designs which both penetrate and fragment reliably, the incapacitation potential of a bullet can be further improved by delaying expansion and fragmentation to a penetration depth of at least 4”. This would place the peak pressure magnitude closer to vital organs. Optimal use of a bullet’s kinetic energy to produce pressure wave incapacitation suggests a bullet design that penetrates the first 4” or so prior to significant expansion or energy loss, and then rapidly expands and transfers a large percentage of its energy and 40% of its mass at penetration depths between 4-8” before continuing to penetrate to the depth desired for the application."
and...
"Review of criticisms of ballistic pressure wave experiments, the Strasbourg goat tests, and the Marshall and Sanow data"
Michael Courtney, PhD, Ballistics Testing Group; Amy Courtney, PhD Department of Physics, United States Military Academy, West Point, NY
Abstract: This article reviews published criticisms of several ballistic pressure wave experiments authored by Suneson et al., the Marshall and Sanow “one shot stop” data set, and the Strasbourg goat tests. These published criticisms contain numerous logical and rhetorical fallacies, are generally exaggerated, and fail to convincingly support the overly broad conclusions they contain.
Originally submitted 13 December 2006. Revised version submitted 31 July 2007