Question about M1 Carbine

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mr_Flintstone

Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2016
Messages
1,445
Location
Eastern KY
It seems I’ve been seeing a lot of posts recently about M1 carbines. That made me want to get mine out and shoot it, which kinda lead me to this question. Should .30 carbine bullets touch the lands in the barrel when reloading? By that, I mean touching ever so lightly so that it might rub off marker ink, but not leave any permanent scrapes or marks on the jacket of the bullets. The reason I ask is that ammo seems to fit rather snugly in mine, and even factory ammo will leave little rub marks on black marked bullets, but not scratches. Everything seems to chamber fine, but this just causes me to wonder.
 
Those things were made to work dependably and not necessarily all that accurately. Mag length and ability to feed were the factors. Doubt you will get more accuracy chasing the lands in it. I just use factory ammo length as well.
 
I’m not necessarily concerned with accuracy, but with safety. I worried that the bullet being too far into the lands would increase pressure. Conversely, if I seat the bullets deeper to avoid the lands, that would also increase pressure.
 
If you’re expecting an M1 carbine to be a precision weapon, you are fooling yourself.

These things were made to replace the M1911A1 service pistol for reserve officers, machine gunners, truck mechanics, and cooks to engage enemies at 100 yards or so.

The idea was that once paratrooping became a reality, the rear echelon types could suddenly find themselves in need of something with more range than a pistol.

Think of it less like a sniper’s rifle and more of an overgrown Ruger 10/22, which is basically what it is.
 
I noticed my load books all state a oal that is considerably longer than the factory rounds i have. easily visibly recognized without using a caliper.
 
Pressure will increase as it gets closer to the lands, 0.020" or less is where the pressure increase starts. This is published in the Lyman manual if I recall. If the round chambers into the lands pressures increase at a greater rate. But this can depend on how the leads are cut in your chamber. If you have enough energy to seat/jam into the leads and go into battery, it will fire, but with higher pressure than on barely touching. A slow transition is going to produce lower pressure than one that has no leads. Now if you eject the round and dump powder every where, your hard into the lands. It's not recommend to load into the lands. Some do it in rifle rounds, but work up there load accordingly.
 
I always stuck with the recommended OAL that my Lee dies suggested. No problems. Bang bang bang every time.
 
So, short answer is no, the bullet should not be on the lands when chambered. That holds true not just for the M1 Carbine, but any firearm. What I've found, is any milsurp, Winchester, or Remington ammo I've fired thru mine has had no problems. Armscor, however, I've had at least one box that was loaded a little long for my chamber. One was so long that when the bolt went home, it was still out of battery, so it didn't fire, and it jammed in the action. When I put a little gusto into pulling the charging handle back, it actually pulled the bullet out of the case, and sprayed me with powder when ejecting.
Now, as far as reloading, I have to seat Armscor bullets a little deeper than standard, 1.665" as opposed to 1.180" And of course, Armscor, or something cast like Bayou Bullets are the only thing I can find these days. Issue is, the cast bullets, and the Armscor fmj's have a blunter nose profile, so they will contact the lands before the more conical Remington or Winchesters when loaded out past about 1.170". So, yeah, you have to take those issues into consideration when loading, and even when using some commercial brands of ammunition.
 
To directly answer your question, "No." The bullet should be engaging the lands of the barrel on an M1 Carbine.

For the record, what M1 Carbine do you have? How long have you owned it? And if you're not the first owner, did any of the prior owners modify it?

As others have noted, M1 Carbine 110 grain bullets vary in the profile of their nose and so may be slightly longer than others.

As other have already said, I used a factory Remington cartridge to set up my reloading dies and never had any problem with bullets from Remington, Speer, Sierra or Hornady.

I'm just envious of you that you still have your M1 Carbine.

Good luck.
 
To directly answer your question, "No." The bullet should be engaging the lands of the barrel on an M1 Carbine.

For the record, what M1 Carbine do you have? How long have you owned it? And if you're not the first owner, did any of the prior owners modify it?

As others have noted, M1 Carbine 110 grain bullets vary in the profile of their nose and so may be slightly longer than others.

As other have already said, I used a factory Remington cartridge to set up my reloading dies and never had any problem with bullets from Remington, Speer, Sierra or Hornady.

I'm just envious of you that you still have your M1 Carbine.

Good luck.
It’s a 1943 Inland. I bought it a couple years ago from Royal Tiger Imports. The barrel and receiver have matching dates 388xxx and 4-43. The bore is excellent to almost new. Apparently it wasn’t used a lot. After WWII, it apparently went to Ethiopia and sat stacked in a crate for 70+ years.Royal Tiger re-imported it and I bought it from them.
 
You aren't likely to be able to touch lands w magazine length ammo anyway. It's never a good idea in a semi.
 
Thanks to all. I think a few people are misunderstanding what I was asking though. I’m not trying to make my bullets touch the lands. To the contrary, I’m trying to make them not touch the lands.

This morning, I did some further testing and found that my original concerns were indeed caused by Armscor bullets and factory ammunition. Hand loads with a 1.680” COL will not allow the bolt to close at all. Armscor factory ammo will allow the bolt to close, but not as smoothly as other brands. After measuring Armscor bullets and comparing them against Hornady and Speer bullets, they appear to be about .02” shorter and more blunt. The shoulder of the bullet sets higher as well instead of being a smooth curve from base to tip.

I also realized that when I originally checked my rounds by coloring them with a marker and chambering them, they were initially in front of the extractor. After that I checked my factory ammo again by placing it carefully behind the extractor and closing the bolt. It left the faintest mark on the colored factory Armscor bullet from touching the lands. These rounds measured 1.635” overall, so I decided to adjust my hand loads -0.01” to 1.625” overall. My dummy round at that length cleared the lands completely, and should have an equivalent seating depth to Hornady bullets seated to 1.645” overall.

That length is significant because some .30 carbine loads are compressed, so I ran some simulations on Gordon’s Reloading Tool. What it showed is that in order to keep the pressures the same as the published loads, I should only use a max charge of 14.5 gr Win 296/H110 or 13.7 gr IMR 4227 when using these bullets.

I think the factory Armscor will probably be OK as they chambered and locked the bolt, but were just touching the lands.

What do you guys think?
 
Last edited:
were just touching the lands
I don't know. Seems a little dicey. Carbines aren't well known for being generous with chamber tolerances. I think you ought to try it but go slow and try three in a mag, check the bolt after each, to see how they cycle.
 
Update: I spent all night wondering how to check the headspace, and I finally hit upon an idea. I needed to check to see if anything over the the maximum case length would fit into the chamber and close the bolt, so I decided to size and deprime a 30 carbine case, and seat an 8mm bullet upside down. I had to stop and size a couple times while seating, and when it was flush, the case length was 1.315” long. I tried it at that length, and the bolt would not close, so I used my Lee quick trim die to trim the length. I stopped often and checked the length, and the bolt would not close on 1.300” or 1.298”, but it did close at 1.296” (although not smoothly). One more pass, and it closed smoothly at 1.295.

Checking lengths online, I found that military armorers used to consider 1.302” the absolute max for any reason, 1.298” the max for in the field, and 1.295 the max for barrel replacement. My numbers square pretty well with that information.

Here’s the pictures at 1.926”.
968D2985-199D-49D8-BFFF-DACB76BFCB34.jpeg 4C353AC1-43FC-4DC4-9F57-E79ED81EAC4B.jpeg
 
Update: I spent all night wondering how to check the headspace, and I finally hit upon an idea. I needed to check to see if anything over the the maximum case length would fit into the chamber and close the bolt, so I decided to size and deprime a 30 carbine case, and seat an 8mm bullet upside down. I had to stop and size a couple times while seating, and when it was flush, the case length was 1.315” long. I tried it at that length, and the bolt would not close, so I used my Lee quick trim die to trim the length. I stopped often and checked the length, and the bolt would not close on 1.300” or 1.298”, but it did close at 1.296” (although not smoothly). One more pass, and it closed smoothly at 1.295.

Checking lengths online, I found that military armorers used to consider 1.302” the absolute max for any reason, 1.298” the max for in the field, and 1.295 the max for barrel replacement. My numbers square pretty well with that information.

Here’s the pictures at 1.926”.
View attachment 1050024 View attachment 1050025
Pretty darned clever I’d say. Seems safe to me
 
You're right on the money as far as a max charge of 14.5g H-110 with the deeper seated bullet. I'm using 14-14.2 and getting good results @ 1.165". My issue with the factory Armscorp ammo was that some rounds were as long as 1.170, which was causing malfunctions. I still had 2½ boxes left, I just measured the rounds, any that I found that were long, I just seated them to 1.165 and re-crimped. The factory loads were not very consistent, 1.155-1.72.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top