Over penetration just is not a concern unless you are planning to miss.
It wasn't until this thread that I gave too much thought to the issue. I always figured that 4 Buck pellets would hit like 22 Short rounds. So to give myself a little perspective, I decided to compare the two side by side.
One round of this,
(According to the OP)
Versus 27 rounds of this,
View attachment 1025925
Well, the 4 Buck pellets are .24 caliber ~ 20.71 grains each at a listed 1325 fps (80.74 ft-lbs and 27.44 PF) each. (1.25 ounce load)
The .22 Shorts are 29 grains each at a listed 710 fps (32.46 ft-lbs and 20.59 PF each)
Multiply both by 27 and we get 2180 ft-lbs for the 12 guage load and 876 for the cluster of .22 Shorts.
Well, the 12 certainly has more potential to do a lot of damage but the .22 Shorts can potentially be placed with more precision. If I had to chose between the two for HD (at close range), I wouldn't hesitate to pick the 12 guage loaded with 4 Buck (as shown in the picture above).
Is any round guaranteed? I don't think so, but unless you're only choice is a single shot, it's my guess you can always just rack again/pull the trigger again and repeat.
I think every shotgunned knows the difference, but maybe some of the newbies need to see it to understand it. Good charts. Too bad they didn’t include the weight of each so that how many of what size was needed for 1 1/8th or 1 1/2 oz of shot. That’s labeled on my loader just as a reminder to people I’m teaching.I see #4, #4 Buck and 4 Buck thrown around here willy nilly.
# 4 is birdshot.
No. 4 Buck and 4 Buck are two names for the same thing.
As you can see below, #4 birdshot is .13", 4 Buck is .24"
They are not the same shot.
Plan accordingly.
View attachment 1023081
With my limited experience with both, either would work in an apartment. I would (and did, when I lived in them) choose a pistol with Glasers and one Hydra-Shock as the last round.
That’s exactly what I use.Good reminder for those who might get them confused.
Thant being said, #, NO., or just the number are correct as long as it's labeled Buck or Buckshot
All of the above have been used in official nomenclature and casual conversation since I can remember. The OP established the context, so I think it's safe to say everyone knows we're talking about Buck.... hopefully...
View attachment 1023165
I have killed deer at 40+ yards using #4 buck. It’s a good load that patterns very well in my 870,IMHO for the SHORT range SD/HD you specified a pellet of 4 buck acts as a .22 LR. Being hit with a load of 4 buck is is like being hit with a .22 LR- 27 times. 3 shots rapid fire can put 81 pellets in in an intruder.
Anything over 20 yards mandates larger shot ( 0, 00, 000).
I have every book Capstick ever wrote, and several that he personally signed at SCI. One thing you should know is that he wrote himself in as the primary character in many instances where other hunters were the actual principal. But, that said I still bought the books and loved the stories. Good author for his genre. But, if it’s true I still have reservations about that claim. His characteristic “two rounds between his fingers, even in camp, “wouldn’t hardly hold 12 gage shells”. Kudos to you for a good post.Peter Hathaway Chapstick considered it good enough for following up lion and leopard in the brush. Good enough for me.
Peter Hathaway Capstick considered it good enough for following up lion and leopard in the brush. Good enough for me.
In an apartment, I tend to see the sword as the safest, fastest, quietest, very deadly option