hawg
Member
As it relates to form/function, why do lever actions call for stock boots/wraps when no other gun does?
I dunno. It all looks almost as idiotic as a scope.
As it relates to form/function, why do lever actions call for stock boots/wraps when no other gun does?
As it relates to form/function, why do lever actions call for stock boots/wraps when no other gun does?
As it relates to form/function, why do lever actions call for stock boots/wraps when no other gun does?
I have a Lyman 57 peep sight on my 1894CP in 357 and it's good for the 100 yards or less that I limit that little cutie to.I just got an 1894S in 44 magnum and I'll be putting a Williams peep/fiber optic front sight on.
As it relates to form/function, why do lever actions call for stock boots/wraps when no other gun does?
I am much faster and more accurate with my Henry steel .22 since putting the red dot sight on it.
View attachment 1074057 View attachment 1074058
My first inclination was to use a smaller and way cheaper pistol red dot because they’re closer to the bore and just smaller! ---------- Have any of your Marlin users had issues with factory ejectors? I found the Wild West Bear Proof ejectors and am curious if it’s worth the $35?
They do not. The lever gun is often used in a saddle holster and the butt stock is exposed. The horse and rider might run through brush and be exposed to other dangers. The same reason cowboys (including modern ones and motorcyclists too) wear chaps and gloves. Protection.
I have both bolt guns and lever guns that have ammunition cuffs on the butt stock because they are hand for fast reloading.
Which model Henry RF rifles has a steel receiver? I am led to believe they are all Zamak V zinc alloy (pot metal)? If Henry makes one of steel I am in right now to order two!
I have a couple of the Bear Proof ejectors in my .45-70 Marlin rifles. I have never had a failure of the OE part. But WWG is making parts intended for possible use against dangerous critters where a failure could be detrimental to one's health. An advantage, in addition to being stronger, is that the ejector is set back slightly further to allow 430+ grain and slightly over length ammunition to cycle reliably. The simple answer is yes, they are worth it (maybe). The WWG Happy Trigger is also worth it or the RPP trigger, both eliminate Marlin trigger flop and improve the trigger action.
As to scopes, if you can get much lower than this Burris 2.75X Scout, I would be surprised. The scope is on Warne QD rings allowing use with or without a scope and retention of working open sights (ghost ring).
View attachment 1074221
The above Remington built Marlin SBL will shoot clover leaf groups at 100 yards all day long with nary a flyer. And it runs smooth and reliably. This JM 336 Texan wears a period Weaver and Weaver steel tip off type rings. The caps are off because I was testing new ammo, 100 yards:
View attachment 1074222
I do prefer QD type rings if on a lever gun. Looks accurate to me. Adhering to some sort of rule book that does not allow scopes on a lever gun because John Wayne did not have a scope on his rifle is silly. Open sights are great in close for fast work but aging eyes or to get the full potential of an accurate rifle, and at least my Marlin lever guns are accurate, to not use a scope is leaving performance on the table.
3C
Kinda would be nice if someone made a red dot or magnified red dot that was internally modern but asethically old school looking or somewhat from a few decades ago.
I haven't read the rule book, but the reason I don't like a scope on a lever gun (or any rifle) is that it makes the rifle, for me, kind of awkward to carry. I like the way a lever gun kind of nestles in the hand, kind of hard to get my hand around the rifle and scope. And I find that good peep sights are more than accurate enough. Of course, if one has vison problems, that's a whole other issue.
As it relates to form/function, why do lever actions call for stock boots/wraps when no other gun does?
John Wayne is rolling over in his grave.
View attachment 1074224
My Marlin .45-70 will shoot a one inch group at 100 yards with peep sights and black powder. If any one's scope on a lever gun will cut that group in half, I'll buy them a beer, a shot of Jack, and treat them to a good cigar.
I have a CP with the round ported barrel.Yes,the 1894S has the hooded front sight,but I always take the hoods off.I can see the sight better in low light.I've got an 1894CB LTD and an 1894P ... been hesitant to do it because of their rarity but I may have to pull the trigger on peeps for both of these. I actually have skinners and lymans on a couple of others. Now that I've had the detached retina repaired and the cataracts removed and the lasik surgery on the strong eye ... peeps are probably in order for these.
Your CB has the octagon 20" barrel and hooded front post? How about the hooded front post on the 1894S?
I have wondered if a pistol scope with a fixed power would be better. Less bulky. Maybe a 2x. I have a 375 Winchester Marlin that I’m thinking about scoping. I just can’t find ammo easily only buffalo bore and one other place and it’s 80 bucks plus shipping for 20 rounds. So sighting it in would be expensive.
They do not. The lever gun is often used in a saddle holster and the butt stock is exposed. The horse and rider might run through brush and be exposed to other dangers.
3C
lolololol. By often, what percentage of lever guns that wear boots would you say are used with horses? Same question for bolt guns?
You are assuming that everyone has good eyes. As has been mentioned by several, some of us older folks have vision related problems, some younger people too and I do not limit myself to 100 yards. And shooting off a bench or rest is not the same as pop up shooting when still stalking. Quigly hit the bucket at 450 yards open sights without a rest, but that was a movie. And the Sharpes had vernier sights if I recall, not buckhorns.
And John Wayne was a movie actor. He really did not charge the bad guys on a horse spinning a lever gun. That was fantasy for entertainment. And Owen Grady did not really use an 1895SBL to hunt velociraptors but it was fun to consider, in a movie. And, he had a scope on his lever gun and so did the feller in Wind River. Just saying, since movies and actors seem to be the rule book.
3C