Backup Gun Choices (thinking small)

Status
Not open for further replies.
That is a solid bit of advice. I would throw in the 10 MM and the .357 magnum. But even smaller stuff, 9mm and 380 ACP are not to be completely discounted for SD. Probably the best advice is carry the largest caliber you can handle shooting accurately and can conceal. And carrying a 40 and up is best if you are going to be confronted by a drug-hyped perp because those folks may only worsen on you if pinged with a small caliber.
Excellent. Agree completely. Sage advice.
 
NPE: Non-permitted (or permissive) environment. This refers to places in which carry/possession is not permitted by the proprietors, but not necessarily unlawful. An example would be a workplace in which carry could get one disciplined or fired, or a place posted "no firearms" in a jurisdiction in which the posting is not backed by a law or statute.

GFZ: Gun-free zone. These are places in which carry/possession is unlawful. An example would be a school (in most states/jurisdictions), an airport, or a place posted "no firearms", with such posting backed by a law or statute.

On THR, we're typically free to discuss NPE-carry, but we do not condone or discuss GFZ carry, as it is unlawful.
 
NPE: Non-permitted (or permissive) environment. This refers to places in which carry/possession is not permitted by the proprietors, but not necessarily unlawful. An example would be a workplace in which carry could get one disciplined or fired, or a place posted "no firearms" in a jurisdiction in which the posting is not backed by a law or statute.

GFZ: Gun-free zone. These are places in which carry/possession is unlawful. An example would be a school (in most states/jurisdictions), an airport, or a place posted "no firearms", with such posting backed by a law or statute.

On THR, we're typically free to discuss NPE-carry, but we do not condone or discuss GFZ carry, as it is unlawful.

Thanks for the correction. :)
 
NPE: carry where legal but seriously frowned upon with consequences such as firing from a job as the classic example.
 
I write off the Beretta Tomcat for carry because I think a safety is a liability in a sudden SD situation. I could get one for range fun though.

So I now have six handguns:
9mm S&W SD9 VE
Seacamp LWS 32
Kel Tec P32
S&W 686 Plus
S&W 642
S&W 31 long (model 31-1)

Primary carry could be the SD9, the 686 or the 642. If I primary carry the SD9 I want the 642 as a BUG

If I primary carry the 686 or the 642 I would have either the Kel Tec or the Seacamp for a BUG.

Nice thing about the Seacamp is it cannot (99.9%) go out of battery if jammed into the perps chest. The Kel Tec easily would go out of battery.

Best setup is the SD9 in a cross draw IWB with spare mag and the 642 in pocket and a speed strip.

Bester setup is to buy bigger guns!
 
A 9mm and a 38/357? Bigger is not always better.
A major part of the equation is the skill of the operator.
 
Now that the Seecamp LWS-32 has been brought to the table, in this discussion, I will express my support. In my hands, at least, the long-stroke double-action-only trigger, and the rather far forward pivot point of the trigger of the Seecamp design, enable it to “behave” like a much larger handgun, for me. (Others’ experience may vary.)

Reloading a Seecamp, with a fresh magazine, is not something that I think is likely to be completed, before the gunfight is over. The trade-off is that the magazine is very unlikely to be unintentionally released. The best “reload,” during a fight, is a another weapon.

I do like that the Seecamp works well with a lube that works “dry,” such as EEZOX.

In my hands, a Seecamp LWS-32 is much more comfortable to shoot, than a Kel-Tec P-32. The Kel-Tec is off-the-scale uncomfortable, for me. If the Seecamp LWS-32 did not exist, I would not buy a Ke-Tec to be a substitute. I do not need a firearm, to fill every possible/potential niche.
 
Now that the Seecamp LWS-32 has been brought to the table, in this discussion, I will express my support. In my hands, at least, the long-stroke double-action-only trigger, and the rather far forward pivot point of the trigger of the Seecamp design, enable it to “behave” like a much larger handgun, for me. (Others’ experience may vary.)

Reloading a Seecamp, with a fresh magazine, is not something that I think is likely to be completed, before the gunfight is over. The trade-off is that the magazine is very unlikely to be unintentionally released. The best “reload,” during a fight, is a another weapon.

I do like that the Seecamp works well with a lube that works “dry,” such as EEZOX.

In my hands, a Seecamp LWS-32 is much more comfortable to shoot, than a Kel-Tec P-32. The Kel-Tec is off-the-scale uncomfortable, for me. If the Seecamp LWS-32 did not exist, I would not buy a Ke-Tec to be a substitute. I do not need a firearm, to fill every possible/potential niche.


I don't know if you have big hands, but I do and that makes the Seacamp a bear with the trigger guard banging the finger. I felt much better shooting the P32. But with the P32 I accidentally release the magazine. I had 71 grain flat nose fmj for the Seacamp. I will try again with the 60 grain HP that are recommended and see if it does not behave. Also the flat points gave some jams. Maybe I need that fancy dry lube. Either gun, my trigger finger is too big for the short reach.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top