Mark_Mark
Member
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2021
- Messages
- 17,783
when a gun has sleds… you know it troubleYou can! All it takes is $$$$$$-
View attachment 1079099
https://www.proxibid.com/Firearms-M...ES-DESTRUCTIVE-DEVICE/lotInformation/47092838
when a gun has sleds… you know it troubleYou can! All it takes is $$$$$$-
View attachment 1079099
https://www.proxibid.com/Firearms-M...ES-DESTRUCTIVE-DEVICE/lotInformation/47092838
It's Finnish, they ski everywhere, even in the summer.when a gun has sleds… you know it trouble
wonder if you can substitute with SPP? magnums probably
Usually no.Did/do they reload these big shells?
Here’s some cool empties I came across. Let’s see if the folks here can guess these babies.
I’ll offer a clue or two. The loaded round is a 44 special. The small one is axis, the large allied.
View attachment 1078806 View attachment 1078807
A 37mm from that era would likely have been from a French Mle 1916 Puteaux infantry gun and fired high-explosive rather than AP as the Central Powers (Germany, Austro-Hungary, etc.) had only a handful of tanks themselves so there was no real need. The main job of the 37mm at that time was demolishing bunkers, machine gun and artillery emplacements.
Bore caliber and Barrel length = nn calibers. So, the 3"25 has a 75" barrel; the 3"50 has a 150" barrel.3” 50 caliber (3” diameter, barrel length 50”).
Oops, typo. I know better.Bore caliber and Barrel length = nn calibers. So, the 3"25 has a 75" barrel; the 3"50 has a 150" barrel.
The venerable 5"38 had a 5x38, or 195" barrel. Short so it would swing faster. Later replaced by the 5"/54 with a 270" barrel (with some outstanding train and elevation motors to track aircraft).
I have used a mixture of:The cases I have are not clean inside. They have a bit of corrosion and old residue. What’s a good way for me to clean the inside?
A friend of mine has one converted to .50bmg it still rocks you when fired!You can! All it takes is $$$$$$-
View attachment 1079099
https://www.proxibid.com/Firearms-M...ES-DESTRUCTIVE-DEVICE/lotInformation/47092838
Owwww, I want one of those.That will be from the 120mm anti-aircraft cannon. It was a beast. Had a folding cruciform platform "trail" that allowed 360° traverse. In the late 40s, they included radar direction.
View attachment 1079674
Not a problem. Tried to find a photo of one deployed--dang thing is huge. They had a problem transporting them by rail for tunnel clearance in WWII.Thanks as I had no clue what the gun looked like.
Iowa class battleship turret (moving parts) weighed about as much as a Destroyer displaces (2100 tons)
Years ago, maybe around 75 to 79 I made several trips to Naval Air Station Cubi Point and the Naval Base at Subic Bat Philippines. During one such trip I remember seeing the big guns off one of our battle ships. Really pretty cool. Then during the early 80s I did the first two deployments of the then new CVN 69 (USS Eisenhower) as what we called a civilian component of DoD. I recall one morning one of our battleships coming alongside and looking down those big guns. Memorable experience. I never was in the Navy but was a Marine who worked naval commands. Pretty much globally. Following 9 years active duty as a Marine I went to work for DoD. My last years till I retired 9 years ago was a transition from NAVAIR to NAVSEA (Navy Nuclear Propulsion). All in all it was a great ride.Not a problem. Tried to find a photo of one deployed--dang thing is huge. They had a problem transporting them by rail for tunnel clearance in WWII.
You could town one, barely, with a 7.5ton truck (the 12 ton was preferred). The ammo was delivered by 7.5ton trucks, and you needed a 2.5ton truck for the gun crew, and a 1.5t trailer for their gear. The commo wire and such needed its own 1.5 ton truck. SO, each gun was a convoy with about 25 people.
Big guns get like that pretty quickly.
Iowa class battleship turret (moving parts) weighed about as much as a Destroyer displaces (2100 tons), and in WWII configuration were crewed by 76 per each (about 12 more than a Fleet submarine).
Anti-aircraft variable time (VT or proximity) fuses were not magnetic, but radio/radar actuated. Aircraft do not have a large magnetic signature. The design is simply to emit a weak radio pulse and listen for it to bounce off the target. By varying the strength of the initial pulse the stand-off range can be set.What amazes me is how some 40 mm rounds exploded a certain distance from a ship , as seen in films with kamikaze attacks, while other rounds were designed with magnetic proximity fuses.
I can’t remember any WW2 films which depict proximity shells actually exploding very close to an aircraft.