Beating costs

lovehappiness22 · May 27, 2022

I'm actually concerned about this statement

But the antis always want the shooters to bear all costs and will campaign against the tax payer funding it...if shooters are forced to pay it they will simply go underground and take illicit arms so government loses all control

How true is this statement?

Speedo66 · May 27, 2022

Geez, another troll post from this member.

Do you even own a firearm or just persist in asking questions you hope to use against firearm owners?

gunlaw · May 27, 2022

lovehappiness22 said:
I'm actually concerned about this statement

But the antis always want the shooters to bear all costs and will campaign against the tax payer funding it...if shooters are forced to pay it they will simply go underground and take illicit arms so government loses all control

How true is this statement?

How true is this statement? I don’t know. It doesn’t even make sense.

Mal H · May 27, 2022

The costs for what? What is the "it" you are talking about?

If you insist on asking questions of the membership here, it is imperative that you are clear about what you are asking. It would also be good to know why you are asking the questions. To this point you haven't supplied that information in any of your various threads.

Bluntly stated, if you continue in this vein, you won't continue much longer.

Hooda Thunkit · May 27, 2022

Truth isn't relative, it doesn't exist in parts.

And I don't understand what you are asking.

You probably don't either.

lovehappiness22 · May 27, 2022

Do the Antis force the pro gunners to bear the cost of everything and not let the tax payers make life easier for the gun owner?

Monac · May 27, 2022

lovehappiness22 said:
Do the Antis force the pro gunners to bear the cost of everything and not let the tax payers make life easier for the gun owner?

No. For example, I bought a loaf of bread today, and the pro-gunners did NOT bear the cost of that, I can tell you that right now. They also have not paid my rent, nor my health insurance. I checked.

You sound like someone looking for a free ride in life by getting someone else to pay for everything. Get a job!

lovehappiness22 · May 27, 2022

No, I'm asking a serious question

Monac · May 27, 2022

lovehappiness22 said:
No, I'm asking a serious question

I beg to differ. See my previous reply above.

twofewscrews · May 27, 2022

lovehappiness22 said:
I'm actually concerned about this statement

But the antis always want the shooters to bear all costs and will campaign against the tax payer funding it...if shooters are forced to pay it they will simply go underground and take illicit arms so government loses all control

How true is this statement?

What statement?
Do you English?
I'm so confused . . .

lovehappiness22 · May 27, 2022

I'm confused too. I thought it would be clear to you guys to help me out. Some person mentioned it

Mal H · May 27, 2022

lovehappiness22 said:
No, I'm asking a serious question

You still haven't answered why you are asking these questions.

reddog81 · May 27, 2022

lovehappiness22 said:
Do the Antis force the pro gunners to bear the cost of everything and not let the tax payers make life easier for the gun owner?

I’m sorry but these posts just don’t make sense. I’m not trying to be rude. It’s just not a logical question.

What is the “cost of everything”?
Why would taxpayers need to make life easier for gun owners? I’m sure you understand what you are trying to communicate but it is hard for us to make sense of it.

twofewscrews · May 27, 2022

lovehappiness22 said:
I'm confused too. I thought it would be clear to you guys to help me out. Some person mentioned it

If you made your questions a little clearer I'm sure you would get some wonderful responses. Your questions makes less sense then your statements thus the answers you receive are anything but helpful.

lovehappiness22 · May 27, 2022

Let's leave it there.

rust collector · May 27, 2022

Perhaps it would be helpful if you would tell us about your firearms experience and let us know who made the statements you are asking us to confirm or dispute.

Mark_Mark · May 27, 2022

lovehappiness22 said:
I'm actually concerned about this statement

But the antis always want the shooters to bear all costs and will campaign against the tax payer funding it...if shooters are forced to pay it they will simply go underground and take illicit arms so government loses all control

How true is this statement?

Bro … I’m not educated enough to know what your talking about. Stop talking in riddles and rhymes. What’s the question?

twofewscrews · May 27, 2022

lovehappiness22 said:
Do the Antis force the pro gunners to bear the cost of everything and not let the tax payers make life easier for the gun owner?

Your question(s) seems loaded.

The First half of your "question" implies that group A forces group B to pay for something, begging the question is this fair.

The latter half of the question divides guns owners and taxpayers into two groups and implies some weird paradigm where the tax payers are trying to make life easier for the gun owner but are being stopped somehow, or implies that pro gunners are not letting tax payers make their lives easier . . .

Honestly it seems like your attempting to get someone to say something insane which you can then use in support of some position you hold. If that is what your looking for I suggest you look elsewhere.

lovehappiness22 · May 27, 2022

I asked for this post to be closed. This post is driving me insane.

twofewscrews · May 27, 2022

reddog81 said:
I’m sorry but these posts just don’t make sense. I’m not trying to be rude. It’s just not a logical question.

What is the “cost of everything”?
Why would taxpayers need to make life easier for gun owners? I’m sure you understand what you are trying to communicate but it is hard for us to make sense of it.

Aren't tax payers also gun owners? Why put them in two different groups? This guy seems like a not so smart troll

lovehappiness22 · May 27, 2022

I'm not a troll

Hooda Thunkit · May 27, 2022

I think it's somebody looking for quotes from a "pro-gun" forum, to post on an anti forum.

Mark_Mark · May 27, 2022

Hooda Thunkit said:
I think it's somebody looking for quotes from a "pro-gun" forum, to post on an anti forum.

that’s not hard to do but the problem is, I don’t know what on earth is he talking about!

twofewscrews · May 27, 2022

lovehappiness22 said:
I'm actually concerned about this statement

But the antis always want the shooters to bear all costs and will campaign against the tax payer funding it...if shooters are forced to pay it they will simply go underground and take illicit arms so government loses all control

How true is this statement?

I'm going to try and steelman what your asking:

Are you asking, if the anti second amendment groups make legal gun owner bear all the costs (not sure what costs your are talking about), will this lead to legal gun owners illegally purchasing and illegally owning firearms in order to not pay "the cost" that is forced on them by the Anti-gunners?

Will this push by anti second amendment groups for legal gun owner to "pay for all the costs" turn legal gun owners into illegal gun owners, resulting in less government control over firearms or legal gun owners?

If I've got your questions correct the answer to the first is no and the answer to the second is no.

Alte Schule · May 27, 2022

lovehappiness22 said:
I'm confused too. I thought it would be clear to you guys to help me out. Some person mentioned it

Beating costs

member

Member

Member

Administrator

Member

member

Member

member

Member

Member

member

Administrator

Member

Member

member

Moderator

Member

Member

member

Member

member

Member

Member

Member

Member

Similar threads