Canada goes all in - Trudeau announces ban on handgun sales, transfers

Status
Not open for further replies.
Freedom (handgun) loving Canadians may want to move to the USA now.
I don't suppose building a northern border wall is imminent.
 
For now, we can continue to use them as before, just not sell them or buy any new ones. We can, apparently, sell to “exempt businesses” but I don’t know what that means yet. I’m hoping that once I die (in the far distant future of course!) my Estate will be able to sell my handguns to a Dealer who’s able to export them.
That’s what I suspected. But I was hoping Trudeau might think this out a bit and reason that allowing a sale to another country ride Canada of a handgun once and for all, and the mindset might be that’s just one less handgun in Canada.

I am surprised how rapidly this happened. One would think this would be effective on a certain date, such as 01 January 2023.

The individual who owns this revolver of interest to me indicated he would sell it to me if such a situation was realized in Canada. Neither he nor I realized the door would slam shut that quickly.
 
Their house, their rules. They (Canadians) voted for this.
Not really true. Trudeau gamed the system. First he paid billions in covid stimulus to the Canadian mainstream media as an incentive to curb "disinformation" and they backed him with supporting propaganda. Then he forced an early election during the China flu lockdown. He lost seats but formed up a liberal government by joining up with the far left. Next Trudeau invoked emergency powers using covid as an excuse (to rid the capital of the truckers protest). He's using these same emergency powers to ban guns without any vote by Canadian Parliament.

Kinda like Biden using covid powers to grant student loan forgiveness without any vote of Congress.
 
Not really true. Trudeau gamed the system. First he paid billions in covid stimulus to the Canadian mainstream media as an incentive to curb "disinformation" and they backed him with supporting propaganda. Then he forced an early election during the China flu lockdown. He lost seats but formed up a liberal government by joining up with the far left. Next Trudeau invoked emergency powers using covid as an excuse (to rid the capital of the truckers protest). He's using these same emergency powers to ban guns without any vote by Canadian Parliament.

Kinda like Biden using covid powers to grant student loan forgiveness without any vote of Congress.


Close but not quite correct. The current changes are made with what’s called an Order In Council (OIC) which can be invoked at any time. It’s still not democratic, but it does not require any emergency powers to be invoked.
 
Close but not quite correct. The current changes are made with what’s called an Order In Council (OIC) which can be invoked at any time. It’s still not democratic, but it does not require any emergency powers to be invoked.
Not bad for a Yank, eh? I conflated the emergency powers with OIC because I never thought Canadians could be screwed so easily. What does one expect from Castro's son, right?
 
It may ultimately end up being a good thing. From what I've read and watched, pretty much all the gun related crime in Canada is being committed with illegally possessed guns, most of which are smuggled into the country.

If a freeze on legal sales and transfers doesn't solve the gun related violence, it will be hard to deny that the problem lies elsewhere.
 
Was yesterday always the day or did Trudeau choose to cover for the hearings on him invoking the emergency powers?
 
Was yesterday always the day or did Trudeau choose to cover for the hearings on him invoking the emergency powers?
The effective date had not been publicly announced.


It may ultimately end up being a good thing. From what I've read and watched, pretty much all the gun related crime in Canada is being committed with illegally possessed guns, most of which are smuggled into the country.

If a freeze on legal sales and transfers doesn't solve the gun related violence, it will be hard to deny that the problem lies elsewhere.
That would be true if the government actually cared about doing the right thing instead of looking like they’re doing the right thing. What would most likely happen in the above case is that legally owned handguns would be confiscated.
 
mope540: Exactly.

The same people who would abolish the 2nd Amendment are the same Huge herd of cowards who said nothing about mass looting/rioting/burning in many cities in 2020.

And of course police were seldom given the authority to confront them. This scenario began years ago during marches in the Portland- Seattle axis of tolerated "party member" cadres, and those cities were like a small lab test for the US overall..
cops dont need authority when they see a crime in front of them. if you roll thru a stop sign they descend on you cause they see the "crime". they were scared of blm cause there were to many of them. they like the odds of 5-1 of them
 
That would be true if the government actually cared about doing the right thing instead of looking like they’re doing the right thing. What would most likely happen in the above case is that legally owned handguns would be confiscated.

Proving anything to a particular administration is utterly pointless. Proving to the voters that an administration's stance is wrong, is far more powerful.
 
Proving anything to a particular administration is utterly pointless. Proving to the voters that an administration's stance is wrong, is far more powerful.
You should pay closer attention to what's going with the abuse of executive and legislative powers in Canada, California, New Jersey, Illinois etc al. It could be coming to your hometown. Watch out for lame duck legislation in America after the November elections. Combo up Ukrainian aid with an assault rifle ban in an omnibus bill. It's a very real possibility.
 
It may ultimately end up being a good thing...If a freeze on legal sales and transfers doesn't solve the gun related violence, it will be hard to deny that the problem lies elsewhere.

I've often thought that about our country. If we just gave up and said "Here, take'em," it would ultimately prove our point. But then I realized we still wouldn't get our rights back, sooooo...
 
Guys, I'm not saying it's a good thing. I'm just saying there may be a silver lining to a terrible idea. And let's also keep in mind that currently it's a freeze on sales and transfers (legal ones), not a permanent ban on all future sales and transfers, and certainly not a confiscation or a buyback.

Could it become worse? Sure. Could the voters realize that this effort does not address the issue? That's also a possibility.

And let's also consider that if Canada stops legal sales and transfers of handguns for a prolonged period of time (let's say 6 months or more), and it doesn't reduce gun related crime, that is real world data. We can then point to that data as evidence that restricting our rights and access to handguns here in the US, won't stop crime. It doesn't matter what you know, it's what you can prove that matters. Consider it a social experiment that Canada is conducting on our behalf.
 
According to Wiki,

approx. 32 percent voted for Trudeau.

Such power-hungry manipulators never Want to respect citizens’ rights, whether regarding guns or anything else.
 
And let's also consider that if Canada stops legal sales and transfers of handguns for a prolonged period of time (let's say 6 months or more), and it doesn't reduce gun related crime, that is real world data. We can then point to that data as evidence that restricting our rights and access to handguns here in the US, won't stop crime. It doesn't matter what you know, it's what you can prove that matters. Consider it a social experiment that Canada is conducting on our behalf.

But facts don't matter to leftists, only feelings do.
 
Guys, I'm not saying it's a good thing. I'm just saying there may be a silver lining to a terrible idea. And let's also keep in mind that currently it's a freeze on sales and transfers (legal ones), not a permanent ban on all future sales and transfers, and certainly not a confiscation or a buyback.

Could it become worse? Sure. Could the voters realize that this effort does not address the issue? That's also a possibility.

And let's also consider that if Canada stops legal sales and transfers of handguns for a prolonged period of time (let's say 6 months or more), and it doesn't reduce gun related crime, that is real world data. We can then point to that data as evidence that restricting our rights and access to handguns here in the US, won't stop crime. It doesn't matter what you know, it's what you can prove that matters. Consider it a social experiment that Canada is conducting on our behalf.
As if the leftists in power will release real numbers. As if the main stream media will report honestly. As if the leftist politicians will respect the results and change their vote. I think your assumptions are based in idealism and naivete.
 
This, just like in the US is nothing more than Gov trying to subdue the opposition(Gun Owners). The left doesn't like the idea of a group or people that can defend themselves if the Gov is over reaching its power. They are not that stupid to think this will effect the crime rate in any way. Nothing the liberals do is what it seems, they use gun control as a vehicle for disarming the public, nothing more. If they really are trying to save lives, they wouldn't be fighting tooth and nail to keep the MURDER of millions of unborn baby's with abortion.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top