ATF Rule on Braces Published Jan 31, 2023

Status
Not open for further replies.

Pat Riot

Contributing Member
Joined
May 21, 2015
Messages
7,380
Location
West Virginia
I looked to see if this had already been posted. I didn’t see a posting but if this is a duplicate, Mods please delete.

I received this in an email this morning. It’s really long, but this is the ATF’s Final Rule on pistol braces.
I have no dog in this fight. I have no handguns with braces. Since I do not, I will not post my opinions on this.

Here is the rule listed under the Federal Registry.

https://www.federalregister.gov/doc...for-firearms-with-attached-stabilizing-braces

<<This is the official discussion thread in General Gun Discussions for this topic.

There is a similar thread in Legal and another one in the NFA section.

Other threads on the topic will be closed. THR Staff>>
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank you for the notification. I took the liberty of editing your title to clarify what just took place. Because they are in effect on and after date of publication, all should proceed with that in mind.
 
And just a reminder, the rules have now changed with respect to short barreled gun transactions.

It is now a potential NFA violation to buy / sell a short barreled gun with a brace. This includes person to person transactions.

PSA has stopped selling complete pistol length guns with braces. They are however still selling short barreled AR uppers, braced AR lowers and AR pistol kits with braces.
 
don’t fall for the trap of a lifetime! if you want a SBR…. do the SBR form and pay $200! SBR’s are cool! brace are funny looking
 
don’t fall for the trap of a lifetime! if you want a SBR…. do the SBR form and pay $200! SBR’s are cool! brace are funny looking
Trying to figure out how this meshes with this:
Register now = you don’t love your dog

Are you advising folks to register their SBR's or warning that if you register it means you don't love your dog?
I'm asking because I'm going to register my braced pistol as an SBR.
 
Trying to figure out how this meshes with this:


Are you advising folks to register their SBR's or warning that if you register it means you don't love your dog?
I'm asking because I'm going to register my braced pistol as an SBR.
AFT don’t like dogs! everyone knows this
 
Take the brace off of your pistol (disabled persons too) and wait to see what the lawsuits bring.
 
don’t fall for the trap of a lifetime! if you want a SBR…. do the SBR form and pay $200! SBR’s are cool! brace are funny looking

I eagerly await seeing satellite photos of the gigantic new federal detention camps that are being built to house the millions of new felons caught in this trap.

I keep trying to find someone who will make a cash bet with me that 100,000 or more Americans (out of potentially millions) will be convicted of a felony for their Form 1 pistol brace applications. So far I’ve gotten no takers.
 
I'll take that bet.

$100 says you're wrong.
So let us be perfectly clear here, and set the terms.

I’m betting that there will not be 100,000 or more people who correctly submit a Form 1 to SBR their braced pistol who will have this information used against them to convict them of a felony violation of the NFA. You are betting there will be at least 100,000 felony convictions of persons who submit these applications. Do I understand correctly?

What time period should we establish? On what date should we decide who was correct?
 
I took the there won't be any convictions side. since you wrote -
I keep trying to find someone who will make a cash bet with me that 100,000 or more Americans (out of potentially millions) will be convicted of a felony
. That reads like you're expecting a trap.

In plain language, I do not think it is reasonable to expect there are going to be any mass felony arrests/convictions for folks that file Form 1s to register their pistols as SBRs.

We can't both take the same side so we have to find another sucker that thinks there are going to be hundreds upon hundreds of citizens entrapped by the Fed on this.
 
I eagerly await seeing satellite photos of the gigantic new federal detention camps that are being built to house the millions of new felons caught in this trap.

I keep trying to find someone who will make a cash bet with me that 100,000 or more Americans (out of potentially millions) will be convicted of a felony for their Form 1 pistol brace applications. So far I’ve gotten no takers.
If everyone is a criminal, no-one’s a criminal
 
I took the there won't be any convictions side. since you wrote -
. That reads like you're expecting a trap.

In plain language, I do not think it is reasonable to expect there are going to be any mass felony arrests/convictions for folks that file Form 1s to register their pistols as SBRs.
Sorry. I guess what I meant and what I thought I said are at odds. I’m happy to see that we actually agree.
 
So let us be perfectly clear here, and set the terms.

I’m betting that there will not be 100,000 or more people who correctly submit a Form 1 to SBR their braced pistol who will have this information used against them to convict them of a felony violation of the NFA. You are betting there will be at least 100,000 felony convictions of persons who submit these applications. Do I understand correctly?

What time period should we establish? On what date should we decide who was correct?
2020 Covid taught me… not trusting and being paranoid at government and big pharma is not a bad thing
 
Last edited:
If everyone is a criminal, no-one’s a criminal
Look, I dislike the NFA as much as anyone and probably more than most since they have soaked me for almost $2K in tax stamps. But the simple fact is that for 99% of their owners those “pistols” have always been de facto SBRs and it should come as a surprise to absolutely no one that they are now becoming de jure as well.

Instead of getting all wound up fighting the brace rule what we really need to do is start attacking the NFA. If shooters had spent 10% of their effort fighting NFA that they did posting “SuCk It AtF” videos shouldering their braces we might be in a better place now.
 
Look, I dislike the NFA as much as anyone and probably more than most since they have soaked me for almost $2K in tax stamps. But the simple fact is that for 99% of their owners those “pistols” have always been de facto SBRs and it should come as a surprise to absolutely no one that they are now becoming de jure as well.

Instead of getting all wound up fighting the brace rule what we really need to do is start attacking the NFA. If shooters had spent 10% of their effort fighting NFA that they did posting “SuCk It AtF” videos shouldering their braces we might be in a better place now.
probably right, but that takes effort and we kidda lazy… ATF can’t be making rules and be weaponized by the current administration to punish the people! Me being LAZY is a right. That’s being said, I lazly send money on a regular bases to the 2nd Amendment Foundation!
 
AFT don’t like dogs! everyone knows this
:rofl::rofl:

i think i,ll just take the brace off and destroy it and keep my firearm as a pistol.
If it is an AR, make sure it doesn't have a carbine buffer tube. You'll need a pistol buffer tube not to be in constructive possession of an SBR.
Being that you are first person here to report this decision I think everyone will be very interested to hear about your experience, so please keep us posted.
I'm interested in this too.
Believe it or not, there were people in line at my LGS before the rule was published getting their paperwork in order so you aren't the first person to do this.
 
If it is an AR, make sure it doesn't have a carbine buffer tube. You'll need a pistol buffer tube not to be in constructive possession of an SBR.

I got jumped and told that I did not know what I was talking bout for saying that on this forum and on other forums. So be prepared for it.

And there are several sections of the brace rule talking about buffer tubes that contradicts each section.

With the 6 to 6 1/2 inch length, that is to keep people from using extended smooth pistol buffer tubes like the Kak Super Brace buffer tube or from using a standard rifle length buffer tube. There really is not a clear and well defined answer (that I could find) on if a 4 or 6 position carbine buffer tube is okay.
 
:rofl::rofl:


If it is an AR, make sure it doesn't have a carbine buffer tube. You'll need a pistol buffer tube not to be in constructive possession of an SBR.

I'm interested in this too.
Believe it or not, there were people in line at my LGS before the rule was published getting their paperwork in order so you aren't the first person to do this.
100%

the smooth buffer tube without the position notch. Comes in Cool colors too!!!
upload_2023-2-1_8-19-35.jpeg
 
I eagerly await seeing satellite photos of the gigantic new federal detention camps that are being built to house the millions of new felons caught in this trap.

I keep trying to find someone who will make a cash bet with me that 100,000 or more Americans (out of potentially millions) will be convicted of a felony for their Form 1 pistol brace applications. So far I’ve gotten no takers.

Here you go!!!

change the race a little, reasons, crime, … Happened before, will
happen again. But this time, you going a free man or a sheep
upload_2023-2-1_8-24-24.jpeg

upload_2023-2-1_8-25-20.jpeg

upload_2023-2-1_8-25-58.jpeg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top