Underwood vs Buffalo bore hardcast

Smokepole14

Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2010
Messages
268
Location
Alabama
I seen a video on YouTube the other day about the Buffalo bore hardcast ammo and it got me to thinking, how does it stack up against underwood? Has anybody tested them head to head to see maybe if one hardcast will penetrate more than the other? Is one softer than the other? This isnt a caliber specific question just simply each company’s version of hardcast.
 
I asked @beeenbag if he has ever done a head to head for his YouTube channel. He hadn't, but thought it was a good idea.
I have never ordered Buffalo Bore, but like underwood. I have also used HSM hardcast. The HSM is not loaded as hot as underwood and Buffalo Bore.
In rifle ammo I have never used any of them.
 
Kentucky Ballistics on Youtube. His older videos from a few years ago were a lot of comparisons of rounds through gel.

I can't remember if he did any direct comparisons of BB and Underwood, but it would be a good place to look.
 
I shoot Underwood, haven't had any issues, I carry them in mine. Can't really say they are better or worse than Buffalo Bore. No reliability issues regarding cycling, feeding etc. I've run them in a 6" Alpha barrel and and the factory
 
I don't have any experience with Underwood hard cast, but I have used and carried Buffalo Bore hard cast in 9mm, 38 special +P, .357 magnum and 45 ACP +P. It all works. It is expensive, especially the shipping if you order it direct from Buffalo Bore.

There is a guy on another forum who recently started manufacturing his own ammo to Buffalo Bore specs. I have tried his 9mm, and he gets the same velocity as Buffalo Bore and uses the same bullet. He also has some unique stuff like hard cast .38 Special +P wadcutters. His prices are cheaper than Buffalo Bore and Underwood, and his prices are shipped prices. I don't have any interest in this, other than that I use it. If you want to experiment with more than a handful of rounds, you may want to give this a look. https://www.lostriverammocompany.com/store/
 
This guy uses a similar setup to what I have so it was more relevant to me. Underwood beat BB by 30 to 50 FPS on all loads. Both are good though. I use Underwood for 45super and 38special. I don't think I have seen a direct comparison video on 38special. I can't remember which one is better with it but Underwood is definitely less expensive.
 
I seen a video on YouTube the other day about the Buffalo bore hardcast ammo and it got me to thinking, how does it stack up against underwood? Has anybody tested them head to head to see maybe if one hardcast will penetrate more than the other? Is one softer than the other? This isnt a caliber specific question just simply each company’s version of hardcast.
Buffalo bore is rated out of real guns too, and stacks up with power levels/velocity. Not sure about density, hardness, etc. I have both, but as others have noted BB is more expensive. I've begun buying more Underwood over time as a result. Arguably, BB has the best true FBI load on the market though for .38 special. I don't think Underwood makes one.
 
Back
Top